UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
SCHEDULE 14A
PROXY STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 14(A) OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (AMENDMENT NO.     )
Filed by the Registrantþ
Filed by a Partyparty other than the Registranto
Check the appropriate box:
þ Preliminary Proxy Statement
oConfidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule 14a-6(e)(2))
o Definitive Proxy Statement
o Definitive Additional Materials
o Soliciting Material Pursuant to
Preliminary Proxy Statement
Confidential, for Use of the Commission Only (as permitted by Rule
14a-6(e)(2))
Definitive Proxy Statement
Definitive Additional Materials
Soliciting Material Under Rule
240.14a-12
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONALResorts International
(Name of Registrant as Specified Inin Its Charter)
(Name of Person(s) Filing Proxy Statement, if other than the Registrant)
Payment of Filing Fee (Check the appropriate box):
þ
 No fee requiredrequired.
oFee computed on table below per Exchange Act Rules 14a-6(i)(4) and 0-11
1)Title of each class of securities to which transaction applies:
2)Aggregate number of securities to which transaction applies:
3)Per unit price or other underlying value of transaction computed pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 0-11 (set forth the amount on which the filing fee is calculated and state how it was determined):
4)Proposed maximum aggregate value of transaction:
5)Total fee paid:
o Fee paid previously with preliminary materials.
o Check box if any part of the fee is offset as providedFee computed on table in exhibit required by Item 25(b) per Exchange Act Rule 0-11(a)(2)Rules 14a-6(i)(1) and identify the filing for which the offsetting fee was paid previously. Identify the previous filing by registration statement number, or the Form or Schedule and the date of its filing.
0-11.


LOGO


LETTER FROM OUR CEO AND PRESIDENT

Dear MGM Resorts International Stockholders:

Your company had another extraordinary year in 2023, in fact this was a full year and fourth quarter that featured all-time Adjusted Property EBITDAR records in Las Vegas and Macau. These outstanding results were a direct reflection of the extraordinary commitment shown by our employees. Their consistent efforts to go above and beyond, creating memorable experiences for our guests, truly set us apart.

Looking back on key moments from the year, in November we successfully ratified a historic 5-year collective bargaining agreement in Las Vegas with the Culinary & Bartenders Unions, which represents more than 25,000 employees. Subsequently, in December we entered into a similar agreement with 3,700 of our union-represented employees at MGM Grand Detroit. Both contracts included significant wage increases, recognizing the vital role our frontline employees play in our financial success.

We also proudly served as a founding host of the inaugural Las Vegas Grand Prix in November. This event generated strong hotel and gaming volumes for our properties, validating its status as one of the premier events on our Las Vegas calendar for years to come.

In another historic milestone for the company, in the summer of 2023, we announced a new long-term agreement with Marriott International that kicked off in early 2024. As part of this agreement, we’ve created a new MGM Collection with Marriott Bonvoy, allowing more than 190 million Marriott Bonvoy members to book rooms and earn and redeem Marriott Bonvoy points at 16 MGM Resorts’ destinations. This agreement will enhance our profitability by driving lower customer acquisition costs with a better mix and higher ADRs and on-property spend.

In Macau, business has swiftly rebounded after three years of pandemic-affected demand. Our market share not only recovered but exceeded expectations. The culmination of this success led to an all-time record Adjusted Property EBITDAR quarter in the fourth quarter and full year for 2023. Looking ahead, our exceptional management team remains laser-focused on driving premium mass business. This involves implementing strategic changes to our casino floors and leveraging the capabilities of our international branch offices to seize opportunistic advantages in the market.

In our digital businesses, BetMGM concluded 2023 with impressive net revenues from operations of approximately $2.0 billion and achieved its goal of reaching positive EBITDA in the second half of the year.

Internationally, the BetMGM brand, platformed by LeoVegas technology, made its debut outside the United States with a successful launch in the United Kingdom in September. Our overarching long-term strategy revolves around expanding into new markets, enhancing our technology platform, and incorporating distinctive content to strengthen our global presence.

Turning to our corporate social responsibility and sustainability initiatives, we stayed the course in 2023, remaining committed to our “Focus on What Matters” strategy. To ensure we remain truly focused on what is most important to our business and our stakeholders, we conducted an extensive double-materiality assessment last year to update the analysis last performed in 2019. With input from company leaders, employees, community stakeholders, and investors, we have identified the highest priority focus areas for MGM Resorts and will update our approach accordingly.

In terms of capital allocation, our strategy remains to invest capital in areas with high financial returns, while maintaining a robust balance sheet with ample liquidity. We bolstered our liquidity in 2023 with the closing of the sale of the operations of Gold Strike Tunica. In terms of capital investments, we prioritize opportunities that yield the highest returns for our stockholders and actively engage in returning capital to them. We are pursuing investment in high-return projects, including our Integrated Resort Development in Japan and our efforts to obtain a commercial gaming license in New York. We also remain firmly committed to returning capital to stockholders in the form of share repurchases. In 2023, we repurchased 54 million shares and have repurchased 174 million shares since the beginning of 2021 for $6.8 billion or over a third of our market capitalization.

The results we achieved in 2023 demonstrate our commitment to our long-term vision at MGM Resorts, which is to be the world’s premier gaming entertainment company through the execution of our five strategic priorities: investing in our people and planet; providing unique experiences for our guests by leveraging data-driven customer insights and digital capabilities; innovating our gaming product; delivering operational excellence at every level; and allocating our capital responsibly to yield the highest return for stockholders.

Sincerely,

Bill Hornbuckle

Chief Executive Officer and President


LOGO

3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

LOGO

VIRTUAL ANNUAL MEETING

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held exclusively online. You may attend and vote during the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast on the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGM2024. While you will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person, we ensure that stockholders will be afforded the same rights and opportunities to participate at the virtual meeting as they would at an in-person meeting.

As described in proxy materials for the Annual Meeting, you are entitled to virtually attend the Annual Meeting, vote and submit questions online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGM2024. You may also submit questions in advance of the meeting until 8:59 p.m., Pacific Time on April 30, 2024 by going to www.proxyvote.com and logging in with your control number. We will endeavor to answer as many stockholder-submitted questions as time permits that comply with our Annual Meeting Rules of Conduct, which will be made available prior to the Annual Meeting once stockholders are logged in. We reserve the right to exclude questions regarding topics that are not pertinent to meeting matters or Company business. If we receive substantially similar questions, we may group such questions together and provide a single response to avoid repetition. You will need your control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you receive a printed copy of the proxy materials) in order to be able to submit questions and vote during the Annual Meeting. We encourage you to access the Annual Meeting webcast prior to the start time. Online check-in will begin at 9:45 a.m., Pacific Time, and you should allow ample time for the check-in procedures.

We will have technicians ready to assist you with any technical difficulties you may have accessing the virtual meeting or submitting questions. If you encounter any difficulties accessing the virtual meeting during the check-in or meeting time, please call the technical support number that will be posted on the Annual Meeting log in page.

ANNUAL MEETING PROPOSALS

1)Amount Previously Paid:
    
 2)
1 ELECTION Form, Schedule or Registration Statement No.:

2 RATIFICATION

 
3)

3 APPROVAL

 Filing Party:

4 APPROVAL
AND ADOPTION

 
4)

5 SHAREHOLDER     PROPOSAL

 Date Filed:

OTHER BUSINESS   

to elect a Board
of Directors
 


TABLE OF CONTENTS

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON June 14, 2011
PROXY STATEMENT April [ ], 2011
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT, DIRECTORS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
ELECTION OF DIRECTORS Proposal No. 1
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM Proposal No. 2
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Proposal No. 3
ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION Proposal No. 4
AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO 1,000,000,000 Proposal No. 5
APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE-BASED INCENTIVE PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS Proposal No. 6
STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL Proposal No. 7
NOTICE CONCERNING STOCKHOLDER PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS
OTHER INFORMATION
Appendix A
Appendix B


MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING TO BE HELD ON
June 14, 2011
To Stockholders:
The Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MGM Resorts International, a Delaware corporation (the “Company”), will be held in the Grand Ballroom at the MGM Grand Detroit located at 1777 Third Street, Detroit, Michigan 48226, on June 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time, for the following purposes:
1. To elect a Board of Directors;
2. To

to ratify the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011;2024

 3. To cast

to approve, on an advisory vote onbasis, the compensation of our named executive compensation;officers

 4. To cast

to approve and adopt an advisory vote on frequency of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation;

5. To amend and restate theamendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to reflect new Delaware law provisions regarding exculpation

of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 1,000,000,000;officers

 6. To approve

to consider and vote on a
shareholder proposal requesting report to shareholders on risks created by
the Company’s Amendeddiversity, equity and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers;inclusion efforts

 7. To

to consider a stockholder proposal if presented at the Annual Meeting; and

8. To transact suchtransaction of any other business as may properly come before the meeting or any adjournments thereof.or postponements thereof


PROXY VOTING

Stockholders of record at the close of business on April 21, 2011March 8, 2024 are entitled to notice of, and to vote at, the Annual Meeting. A complete list of such stockholders will be available for examination by any stockholder during ordinary business hours at the Company’s executive offices, located at 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, for a period of 10 days prior to the date of the Annual Meeting. Stockholders are requested to arrive atjoin the Annual Meeting on time as there willand, with respect to stockholders whose shares are held in “street name” by a broker, you may gain access to the meeting by following the instructions in the voting instruction card provided by your broker, bank or other nominee.

Your vote is important. Please be no admittance once the Annual Meeting has begun.

YOUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS
THAT YOU VOTE “FOR” PROPOSALS 1, 2, 3, 5 AND 6, FOR THE “EVERY ONE YEAR”
OPTION IN PROPOSAL 4, AND “AGAINST” PROPOSAL 7.
By Ordersure to vote your shares in favor of the Board of Directors,
(-s- James J. Murren)
James J. Murren
ChairmanDirectors’ recommendations in time for our May 1, 2024 meeting date.

Your attention is directed to the Proxy Statement accompanying this Notice for a more complete statement of the matters to be considered at the meeting.

Your Board Chief

Executive Officer & President
April [ l ], 2011
of Directors unanimously recommends that you vote “FOR” each nominee for director listed in Proposal 1, “FOR” Proposals 2, 3 and 4, and “AGAINST” with respect to Proposal 5.

Paul Salem

Chair of the Board

March 22, 2024

PLEASE DATE, SIGN AND MAIL THE ENCLOSED PROXY CARD OR
SUBMIT YOUR PROXY USING THE

INTERNET OR TELEPHONE.
Use of the enclosed envelope requires no postage for mailing in the United States.


TABLE OF CONTENTS

 


CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Statements in this Proxy Statement that are not historical facts are “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of the safe harbor under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other related laws. Such statements involve risks and/or uncertainties, including as described in the Company’s public filings with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). MGM Resorts International (the “Company”) has based these forward-looking statements on management’s current expectations and assumptions and not on historical facts. Examples of these statements include, but are not limited to, the Company’s expectations regarding its ability to execute on its strategic plan, return value to stockholders and achieve its social impact and sustainability goals. Among the important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated in such forward-looking statements include effects of economic conditions and market conditions, including elevated levels of inflation, in the markets in which the Company operates and competition with other destination travel locations throughout the United States and the world, the design, timing and costs of expansion projects, risks relating to international operations, permits, licenses, financings, approvals and other contingencies in connection with growth in new or existing jurisdictions, risks relating to cybersecurity and additional risks and uncertainties described in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K reports (including all amendments to those reports). In providing forward-looking statements, the Company is not undertaking any duty or obligation to update these statements publicly as a result of new information, future events or otherwise except as required by law.

Historical, current, and forward-looking environmental and social-related statements may be based on standards for measuring progress that are still developing, and internal controls and processes that continue to evolve. Forward-looking and other statements in this document may also address our corporate responsibility and sustainability progress, plans, and goals, and the inclusion of such statements is not an indication that these contents are necessarily material for the purposes of complying with or reporting pursuant to the U.S. federal securities laws and regulations, even if we use the word “material” or “materiality” in this document.


2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South
Las Vegas, Nevada 89109
PROXY STATEMENT
April [ l ], 2011
General
2024 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

The form of proxy accompanying this Proxy Statement and the persons named therein as proxies have been approved by, and this solicitation is made on behalf of, the Board of Directors of MGM Resorts International (the “Board of Directors” or the “Board”) in connection with the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MGM Resorts International (the “Annual Meeting”) to be held in the Grand Ballroom at the MGM Grand Detroit located at 1777 Third Street, Detroit, Michigan 48226, on June 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time (the “Annual Meeting”),following date, time and place, and at any postponements or adjournments thereof. thereof:

May 1, 2024

10:00 a.m. Pacific Time

Via live audio webcast

on the Internet at

www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGM2024

MGM Resorts International, together with its subsidiaries, is referred to herein as the “Company”“Company,” “we” or “us,” unless the context indicates otherwise.

Matters to be considered and acted upon at the Annual Meeting are set forth in the Notice of Annual Meeting accompanying this Proxy Statement and are more fully outlineddescribed herein. On or about April [ l ], 2011, the Company mailedMarch 22, 2024, we will mail and/or made make available this Proxy Statement and the enclosed proxy to each stockholder entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. Stockholders are requestedThe Annual Meeting will begin promptly at 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. We encourage you to arrive ataccess the Annual Meeting prior to the start time. Online access will be available beginning at 9:45 a.m. Pacific Time. Our Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2023 accompanies this Proxy Statement.

This year’s Annual Meeting will be held exclusively online. You may attend, vote and submit questions during the Annual Meeting via live audio webcast on time,the Internet at www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGM2024. You may also submit questions in advance of the meeting until 8:59 p.m., Pacific Time, on April 30, 2024 by going to www.proxyvote.com and logging in with your control number. You will not be able to attend the Annual Meeting in person as there will be no admittance oncephysical meeting location. We expect that in future years we will continue to host a virtual meeting only, which we believe is consistent with our cost reduction efforts to further position your Company for future growth. Furthermore, we believe a virtual meeting will enable increased stockholder attendance and participation since stockholders can participate from any location around the world. Finally, a virtual meeting is consistent with our goal to be an environmental leader and our core belief that a greener business is a better business.

YOUR VOTE IS IMPORTANT

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting has begun.

Voting Rightsto be Held on May 1, 2024. The Proxy Statement, Proxy Card and Outstanding Shares
Annual Report are available for review online at www.proxyvote.com.

HOW TO VOTE - STOCKHOLDER OF RECORD

LOGO

VOTING RIGHTS AND OUTSTANDING SHARES

Only stockholdersrecord holders of record of the Company’s common stock, $.01our Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share (“Common Stock”), as of April 21, 2011March 8, 2024 will be entitled to vote at the Annual Meeting. TheOur authorized capital stock of the Company currently consists of 600,000,0001,000,000,000 shares of Common Stock. At the close of business on April 21, 2011, [    l    ]March 8, 2024, there were 317,015,680 shares of Common Stock were outstanding and entitled to vote. Each stockholder of record is entitled to one vote for each share held on that date on all matters that may properly come before the Annual Meeting. There is no cumulative voting in the election

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

1


2024 Annual Meeting of directors.

Stockholders

You may vote in person by attending the Annual Meeting virtually, by completing and returning a proxy by mail or by using the internet or telephone. ToFor stockholders who have requested paper copies of our proxy materials, you may submit your proxy by mail markby marking your vote on the enclosed proxy card (the “Proxy Card”), then followfollowing the mailing instructions on the card.Proxy Card. To submit your proxy using the internet or by telephone, see the instructions on the Notice of Internet Availability or Proxy Card and have the Notice of Internet Availability or Proxy Card available when you access the internet website or place your telephone call. You may vote by internet or telephone until 8:59 p.m., Pacific Time, on June 13, 2011. April 30, 2024.

If you are a stockholder of record and wish to vote in person atvirtually attend the Annual Meeting and vote online by visiting www.virtualshareholdermeeting.com/MGM2024, you may do so. You will need your control number included on your Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials or proxy card (if you receive a printed copy of the proxy materials) in order to be able to vote during the Annual Meeting. If you vote by proxy prior to the Annual Meeting and also virtually attend the annual meeting, there is no need to vote again at the annual meeting unless you wish to change your vote. If you are the beneficial owner of sharesCommon Stock held in “street name” by a broker and wish to virtually attend the Annual Meeting and vote in persononline at the Annual Meeting, you must obtain a proxy“legal proxy” from the bank, brokerage or other institution holding your shares and bring such proxy withCommon Stock giving you the right to hand in withvote your ballot.

shares.

All shares of Common Stock represented by properly submitted proxies will be voted at the Annual Meeting in accordance with the directions on the proxies, unless such proxies have previously been revoked. If you are a stockholder of record and submit proxiesa Proxy Card with no voting direction indicated, the shares will be votedFOR as the Board recommends, which is as follows:

PROPOSAL ROADMAPPAGERECOMMENDATION

Proposal No. 1: Election of Directors

FOR the election of each of the nominees to the Board listed in this Proxy Statement and on the Proxy Card

28FOR

Proposal No. 2: Ratification of Selection of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

FOR the ratification of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm

40FOR

Proposal No. 3: Advisory Vote to Approve Executive Compensation

FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers

42FOR

Proposal No. 4: Approval and Adoption of Amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation

FOR the approval and adoption of the amendment to reflect new Delaware law provisions regarding exculpation of officers

43FOR

Proposal No. 5: Shareholder Proposal

AGAINST the shareholder proposal requesting report to shareholders on risks created by the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion efforts

44AGAINST

By returning a signed Proxy Card by mail or by duly submitting a proxy by internet or telephone, you will confer discretionary authority on the named proxies to vote on any other business that properly comes before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof for which discretionary authority is permitted. The persons named on the Proxy Card as proxies or their substitutes will vote or act in their discretion with respect to such other matters. Any such matters shall be determined by a majority vote of the nominees tovotes cast on the Boardmatter.

QUORUM AND VOTES REQUIRED

The presence, in person (including virtually) or represented by proxy, of Directors listed in this Proxy Statement (Proposal 1),FORthe ratificationany number of stockholders together holding at least a majority of the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm (Proposal 2),FOR the approval, on an advisory basis, of the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 3),FORthe selection, on an advisory basis, of theEVERY ONE YEARoption for the frequency of an advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 4),FORthe amendment and restatement of the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase thetotal number of authorizedissued and outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to 1,000,000,000 (Proposal 5),FORconstitute a quorum at the approvalmeeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual

presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business.


Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (Proposal 6), andAGAINSTthe stockholder proposal (Proposal 7). If you are the beneficial owner of shares held in “street name” by a broker, your broker, as the record holder of the shares, must vote those shares in accordance with your instructions. In accordance with the rules of the New York Stock Exchange (the “NYSE”), certain matters submitted to a vote of stockholders are considered by the NYSE to be “routine” items upon which brokerage firms may vote in their discretion on behalf of their customers if such customers have not furnished voting instructions within a specified period prior to the meeting. The ratification of the selection of the

2 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders

independent registered public accounting firm as our independent auditor for 20112024 is considered the onlya routine matter for which brokerage firms may vote shares for which they have not received instructions. The remaining matters to be voted on are considered to be “non-routine,“non-routine, and brokerage firms that have not received instructions from their customers do not have discretion to vote on these matters. Please note that, since last year,

The below table summarizes the voting requirements to elect directors and to approve each of the proposals in this Proxy Statement:

PROPOSALVOTE REQUIREDBROKER
DISCRETIONARY
VOTING ALLOWED

1. Election of directors

Majority of votes cast

No

2. Ratification of selection of independent registered public accounting firm

Majority of votes cast

Yes

3. Advisory vote to approve executive compensation

Majority of votes cast

No

4. Approval and Adoption of Amendment to Company’s Certificate of Incorporation

Majority of outstanding shares of Company’s Common Stock as of Record Date

No

5. Shareholder Proposal requesting report to shareholders on risks created by the Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion efforts

Majority of votes cast

No

Each director shall be elected by a majority of votes cast to hold office until the next annual meeting, unless the election is contested, in which case, directors shall be elected by a plurality of directors has been treated as a “non-routine” matter and thus your broker mayvotes cast. Any current director who does not vote your shares with respect to this matter without your instructions.

By returning a signed Proxy Card by mail or by duly submitting a proxy by internet or telephone, you will confer discretionary authority on the named proxies to vote on any other business that shall properly come before the meeting or any adjournment or postponement thereof. Management knows of no other business to be transacted, but if any other matters do come before the meeting, the persons named as proxies or their substitutes will vote or act in their discretion with respect to such other matters.
Quorum and Votes Required
The presence, in person or by proxy, of the holders of at leastreceive a majority of the total number of outstanding shares of Common Stock is necessary to constitute a quorum at the meeting. Abstentions and broker non-votes are counted as present for the purpose of determining the presence or absence of a quorum for the transaction of business.
The affirmative vote of a plurality of the votes cast atin an uncontested election is subject to the meeting willBoard’s policy regarding resignations, which is set forth in our Corporate Governance Guidelines (as described below). An election shall be required forcontested if, as determined by the election of directors (Proposal 1). The affirmative vote of a majority of the shares of Common Stock represented at the meeting in person or by proxy and entitled to vote is necessary to ratify the appointment of Deloitte & Touche LLP (Proposal 2), to approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers (Proposal 3), to amend and restate the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increaseBoard, the number of authorized sharesnominees exceeds the number of Common Stockdirectors to 1,000,000,000 (Proposal 5), to approve the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (Proposal 6), and to approve the stockholder proposal (Proposal 7). The affirmative vote of abe elected. A majority of votes cast means that the sharesnumber of Common Stock represented atvotes properly cast “for” a director nominee exceeds the meeting in personnumber of votes properly cast “against” such director nominee.

With respect to Proposal 1, neither a vote to “ABSTAIN” nor a broker non-vote, although counted for purposes of determining a quorum, counts as a vote cast or by proxyas a vote “against” and entitled to vote is necessary to approve, on an advisory basis, the frequency of the advisory vote on executive compensation (Proposal 4); however, if none of the alternatives receives a majority vote, the frequency selected by stockholders on an advisory basistherefore will be determined by a plurality of votes. A properly executed proxy marked “WITHHOLD AUTHORITY”have no effect with respect to the election of one or more directors will not be voted with respect to the director or directors indicated, and will have no effect. directors.

With respect to ProposalProposals 2, Proposal 3 Proposal 4, Proposaland 5, Proposal 6, and Proposal 7, a properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN,” although counted for purposes of determining whether there is a quorum, will not be voted “for” or “against”, and, accordingly, an abstention will have no effect on any of these proposals. With respect to Proposal 4, a properly executed proxy marked “ABSTAIN” and broker non-votes will have the same effect as a vote cast against each of“against” Proposal 4.

Proposal 2 is considered a “routine” matter, for which brokers, banks and other nominees may vote shares for which they have not received instructions. Proposals 1, 3, 4 and 5 are considered “non-routine” matters, for which brokerage firms that have not received instructions from their customers do not have discretion to vote on these proposals. Broker matters. There will not be any broker non-votes on Proposal 2 and broker non-votes will have no effect on the outcome of Proposals 1, 3 and 5 and will have the same effect as a vote on a proposal.

How“against” with respect to RevokeProposal 4.

ADJOURNMENT

In accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, the Chair of the Annual Meeting (or his designee) has the right and authority to convene and (for any or Change Your Vote

no reason) to recess and/or adjourn the Annual Meeting. For more detail regarding adjournment procedures and the conduct of the Company’s stockholder meetings generally, please see the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws.

HOW TO REVOKE OR CHANGE YOUR VOTE

Any proxy may be changed or revoked at any time prior to the Annual Meeting by submitting a new proxy with a later date, by a later telephone or internet vote (subject to the telephone or internet voting deadline), by voting in personvirtually at the Annual Meeting or by submitting a revocation in writing to the Secretary of the Company.writing. Written revocations to the Company Secretary must be received no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on June 13, 2011, and directed to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.89109; and they must be received by the Corporate Secretary no later than 5:00 p.m., Pacific Time, on April 30, 2024.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

3


2


2024 Annual Meeting of Stockholders


Important Notice RegardingHOW THE VOTES WILL BE COUNTED AND WHO WILL CERTIFY THE RESULTS

A representative of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) will act as the Availabilityindependent inspector of Proxy Materials forelections to count the votes, determine whether a quorum is present, evaluate the validity of proxies and ballots, and certify the results. The final voting results will be reported by us on a Current Report on Form 8-K to be filed with the SEC within four business days following the Annual MeetingMeeting.

COSTS OF AND PARTICIPANTS IN SOLICITATION

Your proxy is being solicited by the Board on behalf of the Company and, as such, we will pay the costs of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on behalf of the Company by our directors, officers, employees or agents in person or by mail, internet (including by email, the use of our investor relations website and other online channels of communication), telephone, facsimile, town hall meetings, personal interviews, press releases, press interviews, advertisements and investor presentations. We will also reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries, upon request, for their reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxies and proxy materials to Be Held on June 14, 2011

The Proxy Statement,beneficial owners of our Common Stock. We have not retained an outside proxy solicitation firm to assist us with the Proxy Card, the Annual Report, and any amendments to the foregoing materials that are required to be furnished to stockholders, are available for review online atwww.proxyvote.com.
solicitation of proxies.

COPIES OF PROXY MATERIALS

As permitted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), the Company isSEC, we are furnishing to stockholders itsour Notice of Annual Meeting, Proxy Statement, the Proxy Card and the Annual Report primarily over the internet. On or about April [ l ], 2011,March 22, 2024, we mailedwill mail to each of our stockholders (other than those who previously requested electronic or paper delivery) a Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials containing instructions on how to access and review the proxy materials via the internet, and how to access the Proxy Card to vote on the internet or by telephone. The Notice of Internet Availability of Proxy Materials also contains instructions on how to receive, free of charge, paper copies of the proxy materials. If you received the notice, then you will not receive a paper copy of the proxy materials unless you request one.

Stockholders of Record.Record. If your shares are registered in your own name, you may request paper copies of the proxy materials by following the instructions contained in the notice. Stockholders who have already made a permanent election to receive paper copies of the proxy materials will receive a full set of the proxy documents in the mail.

Beneficial Stockholders.Stockholders. If your shares are not registered in your name, you should receive written instructions on how to request paper copies of the proxy materials from your bank or broker. We recommend that you contact your bank or broker if you do not receive these instructions.

How As the Votes Will be Counted and Who Will Certifybeneficial owner, you have the Results
A representativeright to direct your bank, broker or other holder of Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc. (“Broadridge”) will act as the independent Inspector of Elections and will count the votes, determine whether a quorum is present, evaluate the validity of proxies and ballots, and certify the results. The final voting results will be reported by the Company on a Current Report onForm 8-Krecord how to be filedvote your shares in accordance with the SEC within four business days following the Annual Meeting.
Costs of Solicitation
Your proxy is being solicited by the Board of Directors on behalf of the Company and, as such, the Company will pay the costs of soliciting proxies. Proxies may be solicited on behalf of the Company by directors, officers, employees or agents of the Company in person or by telephone, facsimile or other electronic means. We have retained Broadridge to assist us with the solicitation of proxies and will pay Broadridge approximately $140,000, plusout-of-pocket expenses, for these services. We will also reimburse brokerage firms and other custodians, nominees and fiduciaries, upon request, for their reasonable expenses incurred in sending proxies and proxy materials to beneficial owners of our Common Stock.
Delivery of One Proxy Statement and Annual Report to a Single Household to Reduce Duplicate Mailings
Each year in connection with the annual meeting of stockholders, the Company is required to furnish to each stockholder of record a Notice of Internet Availability (or proxy materials in the case of stockholders who receive paper copies of proxy materials) and to arrange for a Notice of Internet Availability (or proxy materials) to be furnished to each beneficial stockholder whose shares are held by or in the name of a broker, bank, trust or other nominee. Because manyvoting instructions you received.

DELIVERY TO A SINGLE HOUSEHOLD TO REDUCE DUPLICATE MAILINGS

Many stockholders hold shares of Common Stock in multiple accounts, this processwhich may result in duplicate mailings of the Notice of Internet Availability (or proxy materials) to stockholders who share the same address. Stockholders can avoid receiving duplicate mailings and save the Companyus the cost of producing and mailing duplicate documents as follows:

Stockholders of Record.Record. If your shares are registered in your own name and you are interested in consenting to the delivery of a single Notice of Internet Availability (or copy of proxy materials other than proxy cards), go directly to the website atwww.proxyvote.comand follow the instructions therein.


3


Beneficial Stockholders.Stockholders. If your shares are not registered in your own name, your broker, bank, trust or other nominee that holds your shares may have asked you to consent to the delivery of a single Notice of Internet

Availability (or copy of proxy materials other than proxy cards) if there are other stockholders who share an address with you. If you currently receive more than one copy of proxy materials at your household and would like to receive only one copy in the future, you should contact your nominee.

Right to Request Separate Copies.Copies. If you consent to the delivery of a single Notice of Internet Availability (or copy of proxy materials)materials other than proxy cards) but later decide that you would prefer to receive a separate Notice of Internet Availability (or copy of proxy materials) for each account at your address, then please notify the Company (atus at the following address: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications),Communications, or your nominee, as applicable, and the Companywe or your nominee will promptly deliver such additional proxy materials. If you wish to receive a separate copy of the proxy materials for each account at your address in the future, you may contact Broadridge by calling toll-free1-800-542-10611-866-540-7095 or by writing to Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood NY, 11717.

4 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


[The remainder

2024 Annual Meeting of this page is left blank intentionally.]


4

Stockholders


SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT, DIRECTORS AND PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS
Shown below isSTOCKHOLDER OUTREACH

We understand the importance of assessing our corporate governance and executive compensation practices regularly. Fiscal 2023 marked another year that members of senior management, together with the Chair of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, who also serves as a member of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee, engaged in stockholder outreach activities, with a particular focus on gaining feedback related to governance topics, including executive compensation. Following the annual meeting in 2023, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee Chair, together with certain informationmembers of management, met with seven of our institutional stockholders, which collectively totaled approximately 12.4% of our stockholder base as of March 31, 2011 (except8, 2024, to discuss a wide range of topics, including executive compensation and corporate governance practices. In addition to meeting with the stockholders described above, two of our largest stockholders, holding together approximately 22% of our shares as otherwise described below)of March 8, 2024, are represented on the Board and in this capacity are fully informed of, and have the opportunity to engage in, discussions regarding corporate governance matters, including executive compensation.

LOGO

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

5


Corporate Governance

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE PRACTICES AT A GLANCE

Robust Director Nominee Selection ProcessPeriodic Committee Refreshment and Committee Chair Succession
Significant Board Engagement on Long-Term Growth Through Strategy and Capital DeploymentStrong and Effective Board Oversight of Risks, Financial Reporting, Compliance Programs and Compensation Practices
Annual Election of Directors with Majority Voting StandardAward-Winning Commitment to Human Capital, Diversity & Inclusion, Philanthropy & Community Engagement and Environmental Sustainability
Annual Board and Committee Self-EvaluationsAnti-Hedging, Anti-Pledging and Clawback Policies
Board Orientation and Continuing Education ProgramExecutive and Director Stock Ownership Guidelines
Codes of Conduct for Directors and EmployeesProxy Access Right
Separate Chair and Chief Executive Officer RolesAnnual “Say on Pay” Advisory Vote
Stockholder Ability to act by Written Consent

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE GUIDELINES

The Board has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines setting forth the general principles governing the conduct of our business and the role, functions, duties and responsibilities of the Board, including, but not limited to, such matters as (i) Board composition and membership criteria, (ii) compensation, (iii) director orientation and continuing education, (iv) Board committees, (v) Board leadership, (vi) director access to officers, employees and independent advisors, (vii) management succession, (viii) annual performance evaluations of the Board and its committees and (ix) conflicts of interest and recusal. We believe that these guidelines are in compliance with respectthe applicable listing standards adopted by the NYSE. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted and maintained on our website at investors.mgmresorts.com/investors/governance/governance-documents under the caption “Corporate Governance Guidelines.”

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines limit the number of total public company boards (including the Company) on which Directors may serve on to beneficial ownership,three when the Directors are engaged full-time as executives in another business unless the Board determines that termsimultaneous service on more than three such Boards by a full-time executive would not impair the ability of the Director to effectively serve on the Company’s Board.

Mr. Diller serves as Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC, Inc. (“IAC”) which owned an approximate 20% stake in the Company as of March 8, 2024. In addition, he serves as Chairman and Senior Executive of a company that was spun off from IAC and is a director on one other public company Board. The Board believes that Mr. Diller’s service on these additional public boards does not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Company’s Board, as evidenced by the active role he has taken in connection with his Board service, including attending all but one of the Board meetings in 2023 and all meetings of the Finance Committee. Mr. Diller also actively meets with members of senior management to discuss the Company’s strategic plan and offers valuable leadership experience, significant experience in the entertainment industry and deep knowledge of the digital space. Mr. Diller also represents the interest of the Company’s largest stockholder and the Board believes it is important to be engaged with, and understand the views of, its stockholders in informing its strategic decisions.

CODE OF CONDUCT

The Board has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all of our directors, officers, and employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer. The Code of Conduct also applies to all applicable contractors and other agents performing services for or conducting work on our behalf. The Code of Conduct establishes policies and procedures that the Board believes promote integrity, compliance with the law and personal accountability. The Code of Conduct is posted on our website at investors.mgmresorts.com/investors/governance/governance-documents under the caption “Code of Business

6 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy.” We intend to provide a summary of any material amendments and waivers to the Code of Conduct required to be disclosed under SEC rules at the same website location under the general heading “Governance Documents.” The Code of Conduct is made available to all of our employees in various formats. It is specifically provided to new directors, officers and key employees and is covered annually with all of our directors, officers and key employees, each of whom is required to acknowledge his or her understanding of the Code of Conduct and agree to adhere to the principles contained therein. Additionally, we will provide a copy of the Code of Conduct, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it in writing to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications.

DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationships with the Company. The Board has established guidelines to assist in determining director independence, which meet and, in some respects, exceed the independence requirements established by the NYSE’s listing standards. Using these guidelines, which are set forth in Section II of our Corporate Governance Guidelines, and considering information provided by each director and all facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant, the Board has determined that Mr. Diller, Ms. Herman, Ms. Jammet, Mr. Levin, Ms. McKinney-James, Mr. Meister, Mr. Salem, Mr. Spierkel, Ms. Swartz, Mr. Taylor, and Mr. Winston who constitute greater than a majority of the Board, are independent under the rules of the NYSE. In consultation with outside counsel, the Board considered Mr. Diller’s position with Expedia Group, Inc. (“Expedia”) and the Company’s arms-length business relationship with Care.com, an IAC subsidiary, in connection with its determination that Mr. Diller and Mr. Levin were independent under the rules of the NYSE.

All members of the Audit Committee, Human Capital and Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must be independent directors, as defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. For the purposes of determining whether a director who is a member of the Audit Committee is independent, the Board applies additional independence standards, including those of the SEC set forth in Rule 13d-3 under10A-3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE applicable to audit committee composition. The Board also applies additional independence standards as set forth in the corporate governance rules of the NYSE for the purposes of determining if a director who is a member of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee is independent. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, Human Capital and Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent and satisfy the relevant Company, NYSE and SEC additional requirements for the members of such committees.

DIRECTOR STOCK OWNERSHIP GUIDELINES

We recognize the importance of aligning our Board’s interests with those of our stockholders. As a result, the Board maintains stock ownership guidelines for all of our directors that receive compensation from the Company. Under these guidelines, each director is expected to accumulate, by December 31 of the fifth year following the year he or she becomes a director, Company stock having a fair market value equal to five times such director’s annual base cash retainer from time to time. For purposes of these guidelines, shares held in trust or retirement accounts and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) count toward the ownership guidelines. Each director is expected to retain 50% of the net after-tax shares received upon vesting and exercise of equity incentive awards granted until the guidelines are satisfied. In 2012, we adopted a deferred compensation plan for non-employee directors pursuant to which directors may elect to accumulate RSUs earned as equity compensation on a tax-deferred basis, in which case the pre-tax number of shares count toward the ownership guidelines. As of December 31, 2023, all directors serving as of such date were in compliance with these guidelines or on track to comply with these guidelines within the specified time period. The Board also maintains stock ownership guidelines for executive officers, which are described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Executive Summary.”

PROXY ACCESS

Our Amended and Restated Bylaws include “proxy access,” a means for the Company’s stockholders to include stockholder-nominated director candidates in the Company’s proxy materials for annual meetings of stockholders. Proxy access was first made available to stockholders for the Company’s 2016 annual meeting of stockholders. A stockholder, or a group of not more than 20 stockholders (collectively, an “eligible stockholder”), meeting specified eligibility requirements, is generally permitted to include up to two director nominees or, if greater than two, 20% of the number of directors in office as of the last day a notice for nomination may be timely received in the Company’s proxy materials for annual meetings of its stockholders. In order to be eligible to use the proxy access process, an eligible stockholder must, among other requirements, have owned 3% or more of the Company’s outstanding Common Stock bycontinuously for at least three years. Additionally, stockholder nominees must be independent and meet specified criteria. Stockholders will not be

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

7


Corporate Governance

entitled to utilize the only personsproxy access process for an annual meeting of stockholders if the Company receives notice through its advance notice bylaw provision that a stockholder intends to nominate a director at such meeting. Use of the proxy access process to submit stockholder nominees is subject to additional eligibility, procedural and disclosure requirements set forth in Section 12 of the Amended and Restated Bylaws.

INFORMATION REGARDING THE BOARD AND BOARD COMMITTEES

As of December 31, 2023, the Board consisted of eleven directors. In 2023, the Board met six times and had five Committees: the Audit Committee, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, the Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee, and the Finance Committee.

Each director attended at least 75% of the total of all meetings of the Board and all committees on which the director served (in each case held during the period that such director served). Directors are expected to attend each annual meeting of stockholders, either virtually or entities knowntelephonically. Ten of the eleven directors attended last year’s virtual annual meeting.

The table below provides membership as of December 31, 2023 and meeting information for the Board Committees in 2023.

      

 

 COMMITTEE

 MEMBERSHIP

 AUDIT 

HUMAN CAPITAL

&

COMPENSATION

 

NOMINATING/

CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE

 

CORPORATE
SOCIAL
RESPONSIBILITY

&

SUSTAINABILITY

 FINANCE
      

PAUL SALEM «

 l       l
      

MARY CHRIS JAMMET 

 l l   l  
      
BARRY DILLER          l
      

ALEXIS M. HERMAN 

   l l l  
      

WILLIAM J.  HORNBUCKLE 

          
      

JOEY LEVIN 

         l
      

ROSE MCKINNEY- 

JAMES 

   l   l  
      

KEITH A. MEISTER 

 l       l
      

JAN SWARTZ 

     l   l
      

DANIEL J. TAYLOR 

 l l l    
      

BEN WINSTON 

   l l    
      

Total Number of 

Meetings in 2023 

 7 5 5 4 6
 

🌑 Committee Chair     🌑 Committee Member    « Chair of the Board

8 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Below is a summary of the composition and responsibilities of our Audit, Human Capital and Compensation, Nominating/Corporate Governance, Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability and Finance Committees, each of which has a written charter available on our website at investors.mgmresorts.com/investors/governance/governance-documents under the captions “Audit Committee Charter,” “Human Capital and Compensation Committee Charter,” “Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter,” “Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee Charter,” and “Finance Committee Charter.” In addition to the Company to becommittee membership and responsibilities outlined below, a beneficial owner of more than 5%member of the outstanding shares of Common Stock, by the Named Executives,Board is also designated to serve as defined under “Executive Compensation,” byliaison to our Compliance Committee.1

AUDIT COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Keith A. Meister, Chair

Mary Chris Jammet

Daniel J. Taylor

Paul Salem

INDEPENDENT: All

FINANCIAL EXPERTS: All

NYSE/SEC QUALIFIED: All

•  Provides independent, objective oversight of our financial reporting system

•  Reviews the adequacy of our internal controls and financial reporting process and the reliability of our financial statements

•  Reviews the independence and performance of our internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm

•  Reviews our compliance with legal and regulatory requirements

•  Approves the report that is required to be included in this Proxy Statement

•  Appoints the independent registered public accounting firm; reviews with such firm the plan, scope and results of the audit, and the fees for the services performed; and periodically reviews such firm’s performance and independence from management

•  Meets regularly with our management, independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors, and the Compliance Committee, and reports its findings to the Board

•  Establishes and oversees procedures for the Company’s plans to mitigate cybersecurity risks and respond to data breaches

HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Alexis M. Herman, Chair

Mary Chris Jammet

Rose McKinney-James

Daniel J. Taylor

Ben Winston

INDEPENDENT: All

•  Ensures that the compensation program for our executives is effective in attracting and retaining key officers and links compensation to performance and our overall business strategy

•  Oversees the Company’s policies and strategies relating to talent management, leadership development, employee engagement and corporate culture, including diversity, equity and inclusion

•  Establishes, implements, and reviews the compensation of our executive officers, determines the performance criteria and bonuses to be granted under the annual performance-based incentive plans and administers and approves the grants of share-based awards and amendments to the clawback policy

•  Reviews succession planning process for key management positions and critical roles (other than the CEO), including the professional development of high potential employees, to ensure that plans are in place for orderly succession of the executive management team

•  Approves the annual Human Capital and Compensation Committee report appearing in this Proxy Statement

•  Reviews and discusses with management the proposed Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure and determines whether to recommend it to the Board for inclusion in our Proxy Statement

•  Reviews at least annually the Company’s compensation policies and practices generally as they relate to the Company’s risk management practices

1

We have established a compliance committee of professionals who do not serve on our Board (the “Compliance Committee”) to oversee procedures designed to decrease the likelihood that any activities of the Company or any our affiliates would impugn our reputation or integrity in any of the specific jurisdictions in which we maintain gaming operations, or in the gaming industry in general. We are required by the

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

9


Corporate Governance

Nevada Gaming Authorities and the New Jersey Administrative Code to maintain such a Compliance Committee and an associated Compliance Plan.

NOMINATING/CORPORATE GOVERNANCE COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Daniel J. Taylor, Chair

Alexis M. Herman

Jan G. Swartz

Ben Winston

INDEPENDENT: All

•  Ensures overall adherence to corporate governance practices

•  Selects director nominees to be recommended to the Board

•  Oversees the implementation of the Corporate Governance Guidelines

•  Develops and makes recommendations to the Board for specific criteria for selecting directors

•  Reviews and makes recommendations to the Board with respect to membership on committees of the Board

•  Makes recommendations to the Board with respect to succession planning process for the Chief Executive Officer

•  Oversees the annual self-evaluations of the Board

•  Oversees the orientation program for new directors and continuing education for directors

•  Follows developments regarding corporate governance and best practices related thereto

CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND SUSTAINABILITY COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Rose McKinney-James, Chair

Mary Chris Jammet

Alexis M. Herman

INDEPENDENT: All

•  Reviews significant policies and performance and provides guidance on matters relating to corporate social responsibility and sustainability

•  Oversees and monitors the Company’s vision and values related to corporate social responsibility and sustainability

•  Advises the Board and management on significant public issues that are pertinent to the Company and its stakeholders related to corporate social responsibility and sustainability

•  Assists management in setting strategy, establishing goals, and integrating corporate social responsibility and sustainability into strategic and tactical business activities across the Company to create long-term stockholder value

•  Oversees the Company’s philanthropic programs, community relations activities, supplier and customer diversity programs and review annually charitable contributions made by the Company

FINANCE COMMITTEE

MEMBERS:

Joey Levin, Chair

Barry Diller

Keith A. Meister

Paul Salem

Jan Swartz

INDEPENDENT: All

•  Oversee the Company’s long-range financial outlook, policies, and objectives

•  Review and make recommendations to the Board with respect to the Company’s capital structure

•  Approve the pricing of debt or equity offerings

•  Oversee the Company’s annual budget, including the Company’s capital plan

•  Oversees strategies, financing structures and plans for significant corporate transactions

•  Oversee the Company’s relationships with, and standing in, the financial community

10 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

HUMAN CAPITAL AND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE INTERLOCKS AND INSIDER PARTICIPATION

During 2023, and by all directors and executive officers of the Company as a group who held office as of the date of this Proxy Statement.Statement, none of the members of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee was or is an officer or employee of the Company or had any relationship requiring disclosure pursuant to Item 404 of Regulation S-K, and no executive officer of the Company served or serves on the compensation committee or board of any company that employed or employs any member of the Company’s Human Capital and Compensation Committee or Board.

DIRECTOR SELECTION PROCESS

In determining the criteria for Board membership, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers the appropriate range of skills, backgrounds and personal characteristics required in light of the then-current makeup of the Board and in the context of the perceived needs of the Company at the time, including, among other things, the following experience and personal attributes:

leadership abilities;

financial acumen;

         
  Amount
  
  Beneficially
 Percent of
Name and Address(1)
 Owned(2) Class(3)
 
Tracinda Corporation  131,173,744(4)  26.85%
150 South Rodeo Drive, Suite 250
Beverly Hills, California 90212
        
Paulson & Co. Inc.   43,800,000(5)  8.96%
1251 Avenue of the Americas
New York, New York 10020
        
Infinity World (Cayman) L.P.   26,048,738(6)  5.33%
Emirates Towers, Level 47
Sheikh Zayed Road
Dubai, United Arab Emirates
        
James J. Murren  2,713,074(7)(9)  (8)
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  229,972(7)  (8)
Robert H. Baldwin  1,342,483(7)  (8)
Corey I. Sanders  357,804(7)  (8)
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  322,605(7)  (8)
William A. Bible  5,000(10)  (8)
Burton M. Cohen  19,697(10)(11)  (8)
Willie D. Davis  125,396(10)  (8)
Alexis M. Herman  79,800(10)  (8)
Roland Hernandez  92,500(10)(12)  (8)
Kirk Kerkorian  131,173,744(13)  26.85%
Anthony Mandekic  55,000(10)  (8)
Rose McKinney-James  62,980(10)(14)  (8)
Daniel J. Taylor  49,000(10)  (8)
Melvin B. Wolzinger  127,300(10)(15)  (8)
All directors and executive officers as a group (24 persons)  137,470,222(16)  27.80%

general and special business experience and expertise;

industry knowledge;

government experience;

other public company directorships;

high ethical standards;

independence;

sound judgment;

interpersonal skills;

overall effectiveness; and

ability to contribute to the diversity of backgrounds represented on the Board.

The Board has not adopted term limits for its members because it recognizes that such arbitrary limitations may result in individuals who distinguish themselves in their board service being precluded from serving on the Board. However, the Board recognizes that economic, social and geo-political factors affecting our global business are continually changing and the skills of our Board members need to keep pace. Accordingly, in re-nominating incumbent members to the Board, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee takes into account the need to regularly refresh the composition of the Board to ensure the Board has the appropriate complement of expertise and recent experience to address the Company’s current and anticipated circumstances and needs. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee requires that any search firm that it engages for a new director include persons who bring diversity with respect to self-identified characteristics such as gender, race, ethnicity and sexual orientation, in the initial list of qualified candidates from which the committee selects director candidates.

The matrix below is a summary of the range of skills and experiences that each director nominee brings to the Board. Because it is a summary, it does not include all of the skills, experiences, qualifications and diversity that each director offers, and the fact that a particular skill, experience or qualification is not listed does not mean that a director does not possess it.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

11


Corporate Governance

Board Diversity and Experience Matrix

 

Barry

Diller

Alexis M.

Herman

William J.
Hornbuckle
Mary Chris
Jammet

Joey

Levin

Rose

McKinney-

James

Keith A.

Meister

Paul

Salem

Jan G.

Swartz

Daniel J.

Taylor

Ben

Winston

Experience and Skills

           

Leadership Experience

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Financial Experience

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Industry Experience

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Public Company

Directorship Experience

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Government Experience

 LOGO LOGO

Background

Gender

           

Male

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Female

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Non-Binary

           

Does Not Disclose

 LOGO

Race

           

African American or Black

 LOGO LOGO
           

Alaskan Native or Native American

           

Asian

           

Hispanic, Latinx, or

Spanish origin

           

Hawaiian or Pacific

Islander

           

White

 LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO LOGO
           

Two or More Races or

Ethnicities

           

Does Not Disclose

 LOGO

Age/Tenure

           

Age*

 82 76 66 56 44 72 51 60 54 67 42
           

Years on the Board

 3 22 3 10 3 18 5 5 6 17 1

*

As of expected Annual Meeting Date.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may receive recommendations for Board candidates from various sources, including our stockholders. Pursuant to our proxy access provision set forth in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, stockholders meeting specified eligibility requirements and who provide required information in a timely manner may also nominate individuals for election to be included in our proxy statement for an annual meeting. In addition, from time to time the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also retains an independent third-party search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will review all recommended candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. Recommendations from stockholders should be in writing and addressed to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications, and must include the proposed candidate’s name, address, age and qualifications together with the information required under federal securities laws and regulations. Stockholder nominations must be received in a timely manner and in accordance with our Amended and Restated Bylaws, and must include the recommending stockholder’s name, address, number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, and the length of time such shares have been held. See “Notice Concerning Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” below.

12 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

BOARD LEADERSHIP STRUCTURE

Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the roles of Chair of the Board and Chief Executive Officer may be filled by the same or different individuals, which gives the Board the flexibility to determine whether these roles should be combined or separated based on the Company’s circumstances and needs at any given time. The Board has no formal policy regarding whether to combine or separate the position of Chair and Chief Executive Officer, but generally believes that such decisions should be made in the context of succession planning. Presently, Mr. Hornbuckle is our Chief Executive Officer and Mr. Salem serves as Chair of the Board as the Board currently believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by separating the positions of Chair and Chief Executive Officer. While the Board has no current intent to combine the roles, in the event that the roles of the CEO and Chair are combined in the future, the Board would consider appointing a strong lead independent director with a well-defined role similar to the responsibilities undertaken by our current Chair.

The non-management and independent directors meet in regularly scheduled executive sessions without management present and have the opportunity to convene in executive session at every meeting of the Board in their discretion. Executive sessions of the non-management directors are chaired by Mr. Salem. The Chair is responsible for convening executive sessions and setting the agenda. Upon reasonable notice to the other directors, any non-management or independent director may convene an executive session. In addition to the foregoing executive sessions, the independent directors meet at least once every year in an independent director executive session without management or non-independent, non-management directors present and have the opportunity to convene in such an independent director executive session at any meeting of the Board in their discretion or at any regularly scheduled independent director executive session, which independent director executive sessions may be convened by either the Chair or, upon reasonable notice, any independent director.

DIRECTOR EMERITUS DESIGNATION

The Board has adopted a policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines for the designation of “Director Emeritus” in exceptional circumstances to recognize contributions of an unusually valuable nature to the Company by a former director. A Director Emeritus, although not typically invited to attend Board meetings, may be invited by the Chair to attend certain Board meetings or functions. However, a Director Emeritus is not entitled to attend any Board meeting and may not vote on any business coming before the Board, nor is he or she counted as a member of the Board for the purpose of determining a quorum or for any other purpose. While the Board may determine to compensate a Director Emeritus for his or her advisory and consulting services and a Director Emeritus may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend Board functions to which he or she is invited, a Director Emeritus is not compensated for attendance at such meetings. A Director Emeritus is not a member of the Board or a “director” as that term is used in our Amended and Restated Bylaws, this Proxy Statement or otherwise. There are currently no former directors designated as a Director Emeritus.

DIRECTOR CONTINUING EDUCATION

We are committed to ensuring that our directors remain informed with respect to best practices in corporate governance and engage outside counsel to provide periodic training to our directors on this topic. Each Director is afforded the opportunity to meet with members of our senior management, visit our facilities and consult with independent advisors as necessary or appropriate. Directors are expected to undertake continuing education to properly perform their duties.

RISK MANAGEMENT

While the Board has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also share in such responsibility. As part of their delegated areas of responsibility, each of the Board committees reviews and discusses the specific risk topics under its area of responsibility consistent with its charter and such other responsibilities as may be delegated to them by the Board from time to time.

In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on significant risk exposures faced by the Company, including general business risk, financial risk, internal controls, regulatory and compliance matters, cybersecurity risk and material litigation and potential disputes, and assesses the steps and processes management has implemented to monitor, control and/or minimize such exposures. The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports from the Chief Information Security Officer (“CISO”) on the Company’s cybersecurity risks and enterprise cybersecurity program. The Audit Committee also receives prompt information and periodic updates by the CISO regarding material cybersecurity incidents that meet reporting

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

13


Corporate Governance

thresholds. The Audit Committee reports out to the Board as necessary to keep the Board informed of issues or risks relating to the Company’s cybersecurity. We also utilize external expertise to perform annual assessments of our entire cybersecurity program, including the cybersecurity program maturity. The results of these annual assessments are reported to the Audit Committee, and we adjust our cybersecurity policies, standards, processes and practices as necessary based on the information provided by these assessments.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews risks related to compensation, talent management and diversity, equity and inclusion. At least annually, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviews our compensation policies and practices for executives, management employees and employees generally as they relate to our risk management practices, including the incentives established for risk-taking and the manner in which risks arising out of our compensation policies and practices are monitored and mitigated and any adjustments of compensation policies and practices that should be made to address changes in our risk profile. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee regularly reviews the results of the Company’s employee engagement surveys, workforce demographic information and the Company’s talent management and diversity, equity and inclusion programs to monitor for human capital related risks. Finally, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee manages risks associated with non-CEO senior management succession planning.

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee reviews our corporate governance practices, including Board composition and succession planning for the CEO, and regularly assess our preparation to address risks related to these areas as well as the other areas under its responsibility.

The Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee guides our social impact and environmentally sustainable policies and oversees the management of risks associated with the Company’s environmental and social policies and the implementation of related programs.

The Finance Committee oversees the management of market and operational risk that could have a financial impact on the Company, including risks associated with the Company’s capital structure, liquidity, and financial markets as well as the Company’s material transactions and tax strategy.

BOARD DIVERSITY

The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity when assessing the appropriateness of Board membership. Though diversity is not defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines or in the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, each of which can be found under their respective captions at investors.mgmresorts.com/investors/governance/governance-documents, diversity is broadly interpreted by the Board to include viewpoints, background, experience, industry knowledge and geography, as well as more traditional characteristics of diversity, such as race, ethnicity, gender, age, geographic location, nationality and sexual orientation. Our Corporate Governance Guidelines and the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s charter provide that any search firm engaged to identify potential Board nominees include persons who bring diversity with respect to self-identified characteristics such as race, ethnicity, gender, and sexual orientation in the initial list of qualified candidates from which the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee selects director candidates in connection with any search for a new director. We believe that our commitment to diversity is demonstrated by the varied backgrounds of our Board nominees as reflected in the Board Diversity and Experience Matrix above.

STOCKHOLDER AND INTERESTED PARTIES COMMUNICATIONS WITH DIRECTORS

The Board has established a process for stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with members of the Board, the non-management directors as a group and the Chair. All such communications should be in writing and should be addressed to the Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications. All inquiries are reviewed by the Corporate Secretary, who forwards to the Board, the non-management directors or the Chair, as applicable, a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all communications that the Corporate Secretary determines are appropriate and consistent with our operations and policies. Matters relevant to our other departments are directed to such departments with appropriate follow-up to ensure that appropriate inquiries are responded to in a timely manner. Matters relating to accounting, auditing and/or internal controls are referred to the chair of the Audit Committee and included in the report to the Board, together with a report of any action taken to address the matter. The Board or the Audit Committee, as the case may be, may direct such further action deemed necessary or appropriate.

14 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

DELINQUENT SECTION 16(A) REPORTS

Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC. The reporting officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely upon a review of these filings and written representations from such directors and officers, we believe that all required Section 16(a) reports were timely filed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2023, except with respect to: (i) one Form 4 filed one day late by each of Messrs. Sanders, McManus and Taylor in each case covering one sale transaction; (ii) one Form 4 filed one day late by Mr. Hornbuckle covering the vesting of restricted stock units; and (iii) one Form 4 filed one day late by Mr. Sanders covering the vesting of restricted stock units. We have a program to oversee the compliance of our executive officers and directors in their reporting obligations.

LOGO

WHERE TO FIND OUR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE DOCUMENTS
We encourage you to view our corporate governance materials on our website, investors.mgmresorts.com/investors/governance/governance-documents. The inclusion of our website address here and elsewhere in this Proxy Statement does not include or incorporate by reference the information on our website into this Proxy Statement. The following information contained on, or that can be accessed through, our website is not a part of this Proxy Statement.

•  Board Committee Charters

–  Audit Committee Charter

–  Human Capital and Compensation Committee Charter

–  Nominating Corporate Governance Committee Charter

–  Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee Charter

–  Finance Committee Charter

•  Corporate Governance Guidelines

•  Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy

RISK OVERSIGHT

Our Board has overall responsibility for overseeing the management of the most significant risks facing the Company. As part of its decision-making processes and meetings, our Board engages in regular discussions regarding risks related to the enterprise and management, focusing particularly on the areas of financial risk, regulatory and compliance risk, and operational and strategic risk. Annually, the Company’s Internal Audit function conducts extensive interviews to identify current and future potential risks facing the Company. Internal Audit analyzes these risks, links them to the Company’s Strategic Plan, and presents them to the Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary. In addition, the significant risks identified in the Enterprise Risk Management process are annually presented to the Audit Committee for discussion. Our Board also convenes for special meetings to discuss important decisions facing the Company. The Board considers short-term and long-term risks when providing direction to the Company in connection with these important decisions, and risk planning is a central part of the calculus in the Board’s decision-making process.

CYBERSECURITY RISK MANAGEMENT AND OVERSIGHT

We recognize the importance cybersecurity has to the success of our business. We also recognize the need to continually assess cybersecurity risk and evolve our response in the face of a rapidly and ever-changing environment. Accordingly, we aim to protect our business operations, including customer records and information, against known and evolving cybersecurity threats. We have a seasoned CISO that continues to enhance our cybersecurity program and leads our efforts to mitigate technology risks in partnership with business leaders. To ensure thorough oversight of the Company’s cybersecurity policies and processes, the Audit Committee is responsible for overseeing our cybersecurity risk and, pursuant to its charter, establishes and oversees procedures for the Company’s plans to mitigate cybersecurity risks and respond to data breaches. The Audit Committee receives quarterly reports from the CISO on the Company’s cybersecurity risks and enterprise cybersecurity program. The Audit Committee also receives prompt information and periodic updates regarding material cybersecurity incidents that meet reporting thresholds. The Audit Committee reports out to the Board as necessary to keep the Board informed of issues or risks relating to the Company’s cybersecurity. In addition, we have a cybersecurity incident response plan in place that provides a documented framework for handling high and low severity security incidents and facilitates coordination across multiple parts of the business. We also routinely perform attack and response simulations at the technical level, and annually execute tabletop response exercises. Each year, special focus is given to maintaining and improving our alignment with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”)

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

15


Corporate Governance

Cybersecurity Framework and Privacy and Payment Card Industry (“PCI”) controls in support of protecting our technology and customer data. We further engage in the periodic assessment and testing of our cybersecurity program. We also utilize external expertise to perform annual assessments of our entire cybersecurity program, including cybersecurity maturity assessments. The results of these annual assessments are reported to the Audit Committee, and we adjust our cybersecurity policies, standards, processes and practices as necessary based on the information provided by these assessments. In addition, we have a Third Party Risk Management Program designed to assess risks associated with third party providers based on the services they provide and the data they have access to. Finally, cybersecurity risk mitigation processes are integrated into the Company’s Code of Conduct that all employees are required to review. Additionally, all employees with network access receive cybersecurity awareness training.

SOCIAL IMPACT AND ENVIRONMENTAL SUSTAINABILITY

Governance of Environmental and Social Responsibility

The Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee has had oversight over environmental and social responsibility at the Company for over a decade. Mr. Hornbuckle, our Chief Executive Officer and President and Director, and Ms. Chopra, our Chief People, Inclusion & Sustainability Officer are actively engaged in strategy and long-range social impact and sustainability goal development and implementation, and oversee these matters on behalf of management and serve as liaisons to the Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee of the company’s Board.

LOGO

16 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Material Social Impact and Sustainability Issues

MGM Resorts conducted a double materiality assessment in 2023 to refresh the priority material social impact and sustainability issues for the company which included engagement with internal and external stakeholders. The highest priority double material social impact and sustainability issues identified are Water Scarcity; Problem Gambling; Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion; Safety and Security; and Climate Change, as reflected in the chart below. The results will be integrated into our Enterprise Risk Management process and our strategic framework for Social Impact & Sustainability on a go forward basis.

LOGO

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

17


Corporate Governance

Strategic Framework for Social Impact & Sustainability

In 2020, we undertook a review of the Company’s Social Impact & Sustainability strategy, simplified our strategic priorities, and created closer alignment between these priorities and specific United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Our updated platform – Focused on What Matters: Embracing Humanity & Protecting the Planet – is shown below.

LOGO

To drive progress in these areas, we established fourteen forward-looking goals across our three strategic pillars: (i) Fostering Diversity, Equity & Inclusion, (ii) Investing in our Communities, and (iii) Protecting the Planet. We have already achieved and reset some of these 2025 goals.

Further, we set three new climate targets to supplement the Company’s fourteen primary Social Impact & Sustainability goals. In 2021, we established two climate targets, both aligned with the 1.5°C pathway: (i) a commitment to reducing absolute Scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emissions by 50% by 2030 (2019 base year); and (ii) a commitment to sourcing 100% renewable electricity in the United States and 80% globally by 2030. Additionally, in 2022, we developed a climate target for our value chain emissions aligned with the well below 2.0°C pathway: a commitment to reducing absolute emissions across significant Scope 3 categories by 30% by 2030 (2019 base year). These goals were informed by guidance from the Science-based Targets Initiative (“SBTi”) and were validated in April 2023, reflecting our commitment to reducing our emissions in line with climate science.

18 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

Investing in Our Communities – Our Core Belief & Strategic Priorities

LOGO

Core Belief:

As a member of the communities in which we operate, we believe it is our responsibility to contribute to the social and economic progress of where we live and work. We are passionately committed to philanthropy, volunteerism and community engagement. Our strategies aim to reflect, sustain and build on the best of a community, advancing workforce opportunities, strengthening education and supporting food security in all our regions.

In 2023, MGM Resorts was recognized for its volunteerism and service as the Stars of Nevada: Governor’s Points of Light gold winner. That same year, MGM Resorts employees volunteered almost 82,000 hours, surpassing the previous year by more than 10,000 hours.

The VolunteerREWARDS program incentivizes employees to volunteer by offering $100 for their nonprofit of choice for every 20 hours volunteered. As a result, $150,000 went to local nonprofits in 2023. Additionally, the new Volunteer Service Award recognizes three employees each quarter who go above and beyond in their communities with a $2,500 check to their charity of choice.

The MGM Resorts Foundation awarded more than $2.7 million to 111 nonprofit organizations located in communities in which the company operates in 2023. Supported organizations assist families and individuals in need of food, housing, health and wellness services, education, or employment.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

19


Corporate Governance

Fostering Diversity, Equity & Inclusion – Our Core Belief & Strategic Priorities

LOGO

Core Belief:

We know the importance of respecting each other’s differences and drawing upon diverse backgrounds and experiences.

We endeavor to embrace and leverage those differences to achieve best-in-class experiences and cultivate stronger ties with our guests, employees, neighbors and partners. We support equality and aim to better unify our world. We cultivate relationships with community partners and stakeholders to drive business growth and expand company goodwill around the world. We partner with organizations and advocacy groups on policies that promote inclusion in our workplace, across our workforce and in the external marketplace.

Our inclusion efforts have made us a more diverse and inclusive company where ideas and innovation are fostered. For example, the Company currently offers 22 employee network and business resource groups (“ENGs”) throughout the enterprise. Our ENGs continually provide access to opportunities for all employees and these groups help advance our efforts around diversity, equity and inclusion. The ENGs advance an inclusive culture and workplace thereby promoting tolerance, mutual respect, equality and belonging while harnessing diverse views and ideas as levers for innovation. Most recently, we are proud to have created a UNLV Alumni Business Resource Group aimed at strengthening our ties with the University of Nevada, Las Vegas and supporting the growth our talent pipeline.

Our diversity efforts are evidenced by MGM Resorts being named a Pinnacle Inclusion Index Company in the 2023 Seramount Inclusion Index, which underscores MGM Resorts’ commitment to advancing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) across its operations.

MGM Resorts is among 26 organizations recognized as Pinnacle Inclusion Index Companies for the first time since participating in the index. This highest-rated tier is awarded to organizations that excel in three key areas: effective practices in the recruitment, retention and advancement of people from underrepresented groups; fostering an inclusive corporate culture including leadership accountability; and demographic workforce diversity. Additionally, MGM Resorts was included this past year in the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index.

20 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Corporate Governance

These designations of MGM Resorts International reflect how deeply our core values are integrated into our people strategy.

LOGO

Protecting the Planet – Our Core Belief & Strategic Priorities

LOGO

Core Belief:

We believe a greener business is a better business and environmental leadership is critical to 21st century corporate leadership.

We aim to preserve the environment by reducing water use, energy consumption, and waste, while increasingly purchasing environmentally preferable materials.

We are committed to corporate environmental leadership, continuing our efforts around water stewardship. This commitment is outlined in our environmental policy, as we uphold our commitment to environmental stewardship through sustainable practices.

In our continued dedication to energy conservation, the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) has acknowledged MGM Resorts as a 2023 goal achiever. We have successfully met our energy savings target set in 2014, as a participant in the Better Buildings Challenge. MGM Resorts was the first company in the entertainment, gaming and hospitality industry to join the Better Buildings Challenge. Additionally, we are committed to climate leadership through other DOE commitments, including the Better Climate Challenge, the Better Buildings Alliance, the Water Savings Network, and the Waste Reduction Network.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

21


Corporate Governance

In 2021, we opened the 100-megawatt MGM Resorts Mega Solar Array. The journey to this milestone was a long one: in 2016, MGM Resorts transitioned to distribution only service with the local utility in southern Nevada to control our energy future and to increase our use of renewable electricity. In mid-2021, production from the array began, providing up-to 90% of daytime electricity use of MGM Resorts’ Las Vegas properties (>65M square feet), and nearly 30% of total Las Vegas electricity use (day and night). This array is a key enabler of our emissions reduction and renewable electricity sourcing goals.

While we continue to focus on energy and carbon, we also have a longstanding commitment to water conservation. Between 2007 and 2022, MGM Resorts reduced and/or avoided water usage of 13.9 billion gallons cumulatively across our U.S. operations. In 2022, we intentionally placed a particular emphasis on corporate water stewardship, expanding our focus beyond our direct operations. As part of our effort to achieve a leadership position in this area, we developed a robust water white paper, a global water policy, and a strategic framework for water stewardship. Additionally, we are the first gaming and Las Vegas-based company to endorse the CEO Water Mandate – a UN Global Compact initiative that mobilizes business leaders on water, sanitation, and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals.

Social Impact and Sustainability Reporting

Throughout 2023, we continued our progress on key Social Impact & Sustainability initiatives and disclosures, supporting our commitment to MGM’s Focused on What Matters platform and the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Our most recent Social Impact & Sustainability Report illustrated the Company’s progress towards our public social impact and sustainability goals. In 2023, we released our second report aligned with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and our first Consolidated Sustainability Factbook. This centralized collection of our key social impact and sustainability metrics including our corporate social impact and sustainability goals, metrics aligns with Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) standards, and metrics aligned with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Hotels & Lodging and Casinos & Gaming sector standards. We expect to publish updated materials in 2024 detailing progress made in 2023. As our catalog of reports aligned to leading social impact and sustainability frameworks has grown, we have updated our website to efficiently present these disclosures and policies at www.mgmresorts.com/en/company/esg.html. The content on this website is for informational purposes only and such content is not incorporated by reference into this Proxy Statement.

22 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Director Compensation

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

2023 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

Board members who are employees of the Company do not receive compensation for their service on the Board. Board members (i) who are nominated to the Board pursuant to a contractual right or agreement, (ii) who are an officer or employee of, or a person who performs responsibilities of a similar nature for, the nominating entity or person, as the case may be, or an affiliate thereof, and (iii) who are determined not to be independent because of conflicting interests between the Company and the nominating entity or person or its affiliates, receive no compensation for their service on the Board. Each director who is not an employee of the Company receives reimbursement of all reasonable expenses incurred in attending meetings of the Board and any committees on which he or she serves.

The Company believes that director compensation should be reasonable in light of what is customary for companies of similar size, scope and complexity, and should reflect the time, effort and expertise required of directors to adequately perform their responsibilities. The Board evaluates annually the status of Board compensation and in 2023, at the recommendation of the Company’s compensation consultant, Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“F.W. Cook”), the Board determined to increase the annual equity grant provided to directors from $175,000 to $190,000 to better align director compensation with the median of the peer group.

The following table sets forth information regarding non-management director compensation for 2023.

NAME

  FEES EARNED OR
PAID IN CASH
 

STOCK

AWARDS(A)(B)

  

ALL OTHER

COMPENSATION(C)

  TOTAL

Barry Diller

   $  $   $17,360   $17,360

Alexis M. Herman

    170,000   190,000    17,360    377,360

Mary Chris Jammet

    150,000   190,000    17,360    357,360

Joey Levin

           17,360    17,360

Rose McKinney-James

    160,000(D)(E)    190,000(E)     17,360    367,360

Keith Meister

    145,000(E)    190,000(E)     17,360    352,360

Paul Salem

    380,000(E)(F)    190,000(E)     17,360    587,360

Gregory M. Spierkel(I)

    37,500       17,360    54,860

Jan G. Swartz

    130,000   190,000    17,360    337,360

Daniel J. Taylor

    290,000(G)(H)    190,000    17,360    497,360

Ben Winston

    110,000   190,000    21,080    321,080

(A)

The amount reflected in this column is the grant date fair value of awards granted during 2023, computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. In respect of the annual equity retainer, except for Mr. Diller, Mr. Levin, and Mr. Spierkel each non-management director received a grant of 4,344 RSUs with a value of $190,000 in May 2023, which will vest on May 1, 2024. Mr. Diller and Mr. Levin have elected to decline any compensation for their service on the Board other than accepting MGM Rewards Points pursuant to the Company’s Facility Use Policy.

(B)

On December 31, 2023, non-management directors held the following shares of RSUs, which were granted in 2023 and are not fully vested, and deferred stock units (including DEUs associated with these awards): Ms. Herman, 4,344; Ms. Jammet, 13,298; Ms. McKinney-James, 60,148; Mr. Meister, 47,989; Mr. Salem, 89,180; Ms. Swartz, 4,344; Mr. Taylor, 83,825; and Mr. Winston, 4,344.

(C)

Reflects a reasonable estimate, at our discounted rate for insiders, of the points provided to directors (whether used or not) with benefits under our MGM Rewards Points program pursuant to the Company’s Facility Use Policy (as described below).

(D)

Includes an annual retainer of $10,000 for serving on the Board of Directors of MGM Grand Detroit, LLC.

(E)

All or a portion of these amounts were deferred pursuant to the Company’s Deferred Compensation Plan for Non-Employee Directors.

(F)

Includes an annual retainer of $250,000 for his role as Chair of the Board.

(G)

Includes an annual retainer of $20,000 for his role as liaison to Compliance Committee.

(H)

Includes an annual retainer of $105,000 for his service on the board of MGM China.

(I)

Mr. Spierkel did not stand for re-election at the 2023 annual meeting and, as a result, ceased to be a director on May 2, 2023.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

23


Director Compensation

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR COMPENSATION STRUCTURE

Independent directors receive the following, payable in equal quarterly installments: an annual retainer, an annual fee for service on a Board committee and, as applicable, an annual fee for service as a Board committee chair, an annual fee for service as the Chair of the Board, an annual fee for service as liaison to the Compliance Committee of the Company, an annual fee for engaging in annual diligence review and strategic oversight in key areas of interest, which may include traveling from time to time, and an annual fee for service on the MGM China Board of Directors. Independent directors also receive an annual equity incentive award, which was $190,000 in 2023. The Company’s omnibus incentive plan provides a cap on overall director compensation of $750,000, with a higher $1,000,000 cap during a director’s initial year of service and for the Chair of the Board.

For 2023, independent director cash compensation was structured as follows:

Annual Retainer

$90,000

Additional Annual Retainer for Service as Board Chair

$250,000

Additional Annual Retainer for Service on the MGM China Board(1)

$105,000

Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Service

$20,000 per committee

Additional Annual Retainer for Committee Chairs

$20,000

Additional Annual Retainer for Liaison to Compliance Committee

$20,000

Additional Annual Retainer for Engaging in Diligence Review in Key Areas of Interest

$7,500

Per-Meeting Fees

None

(1)

Fees for services on the MGM China board are determined based on fees paid to similarly situated independent directors of MGM China.

INDEPENDENT DIRECTOR USE OF COMPANY FACILITIES

We have a Policy Concerning Independent Director Use of Company Facilities (the “Facility Use Policy”). To permit independent directors to experience our facilities and to better prepare themselves to provide guidance to us on matters related to product differentiation and resort operations, each year, following the election of the Board at the annual meeting of stockholders, each independent director is offered a certain amount of MGM Rewards Points to be utilized at our resort facilities. As each independent director may have different schedule constraints resulting in varying frequencies of visits to our facilities, independent directors may request to receive a lesser number of MGM Rewards Points to suit their anticipated annual visitation. In addition, as a token of appreciation for significant Board service, each independent director who has served on the Board for a minimum of three years will continue to be offered a certain amount of MGM Rewards Points for an additional three years after they have ceased to serve on the Board, provided (a) the independent director’s departure from the Board was on good terms as determined by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in its discretion (for example, the independent director must not have been removed for cause and there must have been no disagreement in connection with the non-management director’s departure from the Board that would be required to be reported by the Company on Form 8-K) and (b) the independent director does not after his or her departure from the Board take any action that adversely impacts the Company or breach any agreement with or duty to the Company, in each case as determined by the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in its discretion. To the extent required by applicable law or Internal Revenue Service regulations, the fair value of MGM Rewards Points awarded to each independent director and former independent director, as such value is established by us from time to time, will be reported as income to the director on Form 1099. Each independent non-management director and former independent non-management director is responsible for paying any applicable income taxes on these amounts based on his or her personal income tax return.

24 

Unless otherwise indicated,

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Principal Stockholders

PRINCIPAL STOCKHOLDERS

The table below shows the number of shares of our Common Stock beneficially owned as of the close of business on March 8, 2024 by each of our directors, director nominees and named executive officers, as well as the number of shares beneficially owned by all of our current directors and executive officers as a group based on 317,015,680 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 8, 2024.

NAME(A)

  COMMON
STOCK
 OPTIONS/SARs/
RSUs
EXERCISABLE
OR VESTING
WITHIN 60 DAYS(B)(C)
  TOTAL SHARES
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED(B)(C)
  PERCENT
OF CLASS
 DEFERRED
STOCK
UNITS(C)

Barry Diller

       —      —       *   —  

Gary Fritz

    30,632   —      30,632       *   —  

Jonathan S. Halkyard

    28,299   —      28,299       *   —  

Alexis M. Herman

    14,797(D)    4,344      19,141       *   —  

William J. Hornbuckle

    484,165(E)    11,259      495,424       *   —  

Mary Chris Jammet

    5,250   4,344      9,594       *   8,954  

Joey Levin

       —      —       *   —  

Rose McKinney-James

    891   869      1,760       *   59,279  

John M. McManus

    63,844   6,529      70,373       *   —  

Keith A. Meister

    6,423,778(F)    —      6,423,778       2.03%   47,989  

Paul Salem

    1,555,000   —      1,555,000       *   89,180  

Corey I. Sanders

    266,727(G)    8,856      275,583       *   —  

Jan G. Swartz

    50,798(H)    4,344      55,142       *   —  

Daniel J. Taylor

       4,344      4,344       *   79,481  

Ben Winston

    986   4,344      5,330       *   —  

All current directors and executive officers as a group (15 persons total)

    8,925,167    49,233      8,974,400       2.83%   284,883  

*

Less than 1%.

(A)

The address for the persons listed abovein this column is 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109.

(2)(B)

Deferred stock units are excluded from shares beneficially owned. Except as otherwise indicated, and subject to applicable community property and similar laws, the persons listed as beneficial owners of the shares have sole voting and investment power with respect to such shares.

(C)

Includes all previously deferred stock units held by Non-Employee Directors and RSUs to be deferred within 60 days. Deferred stock units are payable either in a lump sum or installments, at the director’s election, with the lump sum or first installment payable within 90 days of the first day of the month following the director’s separation from the Board.

(3)(D)

Includes 14,797 shares held in living trust.

(E)For purposes

Includes 172,781 shares held in trust.

(F)

The 6,423,778 shares of calculating the percentage of outstanding shares beneficially owned by any person or group identifiedCommon Stock included in the table above are held for the numberaccounts of certain private investment funds for which Corvex Management LP (“Corvex”) acts as investment adviser, including Corvex Master Fund LP and Corvex Select Equity Master Fund LP. The general partner of Corvex is controlled by Mr. Meister.

(G)

Includes 36,465 shares held in trust.

(H)

Includes 19,858 shares held in trust.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

25


Principal Stockholders

Based on filings made under Sections 13(d) and 13(g) of the Exchange Act, as of March 8, 2024, the only persons known by us to be the beneficial owners of more than 5% of our Common Stock were as follows based on 317,015,680 shares of our Common Stock outstanding as of March 8, 2024:

NAME AND ADDRESS

 COMMON
STOCK
BENEFICIALLY
OWNED(A)
  PERCENT
OF CLASS
 

IAC, Inc.(B)

555 West 18th Street

New York, NY 10011

  64,723,602   20.42

The Vanguard Group(C)

100 Vanguard Blvd.

Malvern, PA 19355

  30,476,791   9.61

BlackRock, Inc.(D)

55 East 52nd Street

New York, NY 10055

  21,674,207   6.84

(A)

Except as otherwise indicated, the persons listed as beneficial owners of the shares have sole voting and investment power with respect to each person or group was deemed to be the sum of the total shares outstanding as of March 31, 2011 and the total number of shares subject to stock options and stock appreciation rights exercisable as of March 31, 2011, and stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock units that become exercisable or vest within 60 days thereafter held by such person or group. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 31, 2011 was 488,581,951.shares.


5


(B)

Based on Schedule 13D/A filed by IAC, Inc. with the SEC on August 26, 2022. Reflects sole voting power and sole dispositive power of 64,723,602 shares.

(C)
(4)

Based upon a Schedule 13D/13G/A filed January 28, 2011by The Vanguard Group with the SEC by Tracinda Corporation (“Tracinda”), a Nevada corporation. Tracinda is wholly owned by Kirk Kerkorian.on February 13, 2024. Reflects sole dispositive power of 29,324,940 shares. Reflects shared voting power of 346,486 shares and shared dispositive power of 1,151,851 shares.

(5)(D)

Based upon a Schedule 13G13 G/A filed February 15, 2011by BlackRock, Inc. with the SEC by Paulson & Co. Inc. According to this Schedule 13G, allon January 29, 2024. Reflects sole voting power of the securities are owned by various onshore20,089,954 and offshore investment funds and separate managed accounts, and Paulson & Co. Inc. disclaims beneficial ownershipsole dispositive power of such securities.21,674,207 shares.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP IN OUR SUBSIDIARIES

As of the close of business on March 8, 2024, none of our directors, director nominees or named executive officers held shares in MGM China.

(6)Based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed January 20, 2011 with the SEC by Infinity World (Cayman) L.P. and its affiliates.
(7)Included in these amounts are 2,543,750 shares, 217,250 shares, 1,307,812 shares, 345,000 shares, and 310,000 shares underlying stock options and stock appreciation rights that are exercisable as of March 31, 2011, and stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock units that become exercisable or vest within 60 days thereafter, held by Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders, and Hornbuckle, respectively. Mr. Baldwin disclaims beneficial ownership of 155,737 shares underlying such stock options which were the subject of a divorce decree.
(8)Less than 1%.
(9)Includes 22,870 shares held by a Grantor Retained Annuity Trust, of which Mr. Murren is Trustee, and 146,454 shares held by the Murren Family Trust, of which Mr. Murren is co-Trustee.
(10)Included in these amounts are shares underlying options and stock appreciation rights that are exercisable as of March 31, 2011 or become exercisable within 60 days thereafter, held as follows:
26 

 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

 


Transactions with Related Persons

TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS

Related person transactions covered by Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K requiring prior review and oversight by the Audit Committee are referred to the Audit Committee for approval, ratification or other action. Based on its consideration of all of the relevant facts and circumstances, the Audit Committee decides whether or not to approve such transactions and approves only those transactions that are deemed to be in the best interests of the Company, including consideration of the factors set forth in our written guidelines under our Code of Conduct for the reporting, review and approval of potential conflicts of interest: the size of the transaction or investment, the nature of the transaction or investment, the nature of the relationship between the third party and the Company, the nature of the relationship between the third party and the director or employee, the net worth of the employee or director, and any other factors the Committee deems appropriate. Our executive officers and directors may also enter into transactions with us involving the purchase of goods or services, such as hotel rooms, tickets to events or meals at restaurants. These transactions are in the ordinary course of our business, and we provide them on terms that we offer to our customers generally. If the Company becomes aware of an existing transaction with a related person that has not been approved under the foregoing procedures, the matter is referred to the Audit Committee. The Audit Committee then evaluates all options available, including ratification, revision or termination of such transaction. The Company had the following related party transactions since the beginning of 2023:

In 2023, Sean Lanni, the son-in-law of Mr. Hornbuckle, our Chief Executive Officer, President and a Director of the Company entered into a three-year employment agreement with the Company for the position of President International Marketing, which provides for a base salary of $600,000. In addition, Mr. Lanni is eligible for an annual equity award and a target annual bonus on the same general terms and conditions as applicable to employees in similar positions who are not related to Mr. Hornbuckle. In 2023, Mr. Lanni also received an annual equity grant from MGM China in connection with MGM China’s equity grant program and was eligible to participate in a special bonus program which will provide him with the opportunity to earn an incremental annual bonus in an amount up to 50% of his base salary based on incremental increases in theoretical profit from Far East/Asian marketing gaming customer play. In addition, Mr. Lanni has been appointed President and Chief Operating Officer of The Cosmopolitan of Las Vegas, effective February 19, 2024.

 Shares

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

  Underlying
Options
Name
and SARs
Mr. Bible5,000
Mr. Cohen5,000
Mr. Davis92,750
Ms. Herman78,000
Mr. Hernandez88,000
Mr. Mandekic53,000
Ms. McKinney-James62,000
Mr. Taylor49,000
Mr. Wolzinger88,000

27


(11)Includes 14,697 shares held by the Burton M. Cohen Trust.
(12)Includes 1,000 shares held by the Roland Hernandez SEP Retirement Account, of which Mr. Hernandez is the beneficiary, and 1,500 shares held by Mr. Hernandez’s children of which Mr. Hernandez disclaims beneficial ownership.
(13)Shares are owned by Tracinda, which is wholly owned by Mr. Kerkorian. As of January 28, 2011, Tracinda owned approximately 26.9% of the outstanding Common Stock based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed January 28, 2011 with the SEC by Tracinda. All such shares are pledged as security.
(14)Includes 880 shares held by the Energy Works Consulting LLC 401(k) Plan, of which Ms. McKinney-James is a beneficiary.
(15)Includes 39,300 shares held by the Wolzinger Family Trust.
(16)Included are 515,750 shares subject to stock options or stock appreciation rights exercisable as of March 31, 2011, and stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock units that become exercisable or vest within 60 days thereafter held by non-employee directors and 668,468 shares underlying stock options and stock appreciation rights exercisable as of March 31, 2011, and stock options, stock appreciation rights or restricted stock units that become exercisable or vest within 60 days thereafter held by executive officers other than the Named Executives.


6

Proposals Requiring Your Vote


PROPOSALS REQUIRING YOUR VOTE

PROPOSAL NO. 1 ELECTION OF DIRECTORS
Proposal No. 1

At the Annual Meeting, our stockholders are being asked to elect directors, each of whom shallwill serve until the next annual meeting of stockholders or until his or her respective successor shall havehas been elected and qualified, or until his or her earlier resignation or removal. All of the Company’s nominees on the Proxy Card were elected as directors at the last annual meeting of stockholders. One of our current directors, Mr. Kirk Kerkorian, will cease to be a director upon expiration of his current term. The Board intends to grant Mr. Kerkorian the status of Director Emeritus following the Annual Meeting, pursuant to the Director Emeritus policy found in our Corporate Governance Guidelines. After the expiration of Mr. Kerkorian’s current term as a director, the Board of Directors intends to fix the number of directors constituting the Board at 11. If any of the following nominees should be unavailable to serve as a director, which contingency is not presently anticipated, it is the intention of the persons designated as proxies to select and cast their votes for the election of such other person or persons as the Board of Directors may designate.

The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the election of
each of the nominees to the Board of Directors.

Board.

Information Concerning the Board’s Nominees

The Board seeks nominees who have substantial professional accomplishments and who are leaders in the companies or institutions with which they are affiliated. Nominees should be persons who are capable of applying independent judgment and undertaking analytical inquiries and who exhibit high integrity, practical wisdom and mature judgment. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee evaluates each individual in the context of the Board as a whole, with the objective of recommending a group that will best perpetuate the success of the business and represent stockholder interests through the exercise of sound judgment, based on diverse experiences. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, together with the Board, reviews on an annual basis the composition of the Board to determine whether the Board includes the right mix and balance of skill sets, financial acumen, general and special business experience and expertise, industry knowledge, diversity (such as, and including but not limited to, gender, race/ethnicity, age, geographic location, and nationality), leadership abilities, high ethical standards, independence, sound judgment, interpersonal skills, overall effectiveness and other desired qualities. Director candidates also must meet the approval of certain state regulatory authorities.

We identify and describe below the key experience, qualifications and skills, in addition to those discussed above, that the directors bring to the Board and that are important in light of the Company’sour business.

 

Leadership experience. Directors with experience in significant leadership positions demonstrate a practical understanding of organizations, processes, strategy, risk management and the methods to drive change and growth. Thus, their service as top leaders at other organizations also benefits the Company.us.

 

Finance experience. An understanding of finance and financial reporting is important for our directors, as the Company measures itswe measure our operating and strategic performance by reference to financial targets. As such, in addition to our directors who may qualify as audit committee financial experts, we expect all of our directors to be financially knowledgeable.

 

Industry experience. We seek to have directors with experience as executives, as directors or in other leadership positions in the resort, gaming and gamingentertainment industries in which we participate, particularly given the highly regulated nature of these industries.industries, as well as experience in the digital industry working with omni channel platforms.

 

Government experience. We seek directors with governmentalgovernment experience, as our business is subject to extensive government regulation and the Company iswe are directly affected by governmental actions. We therefore recognize the importance of working constructively with the local, state, federal and international governments.

 

Public company directorship experience. We seek directors with experience as directors of other public companies, as we believe these individuals will have been exposed to the various types of financial, governance and operational matters that companies such as ours consider from time to time.


7

28 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote


The following table sets forth, for each nominee, his or her name, age as of the date of the Annual Meeting, principal occupation for at least the past five years age and certain other matters, in each case as of March 31, 2011 (except as otherwise described below).matters. The respective experiences, qualifications and skills the Board considered in determining whether to recommend each director nominated for election are also included immediately following such nominees’ individual biographies.
in the column to the right.

BARRY DILLER

  

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC, Inc. (“IAC”) since December 2010.

•  Chairman and Senior Executive of Expedia Group, Inc., an online travel company (formerly, Expedia, Inc.), since August 2005.

•  From 1995 to late 2010, served as the Chairman and the Chief Executive Officer of IAC.

•  Since December 1992, beginning with QVC, Inc., served as chief executive for a number of predecessor companies engaged in media and interactivity prior to the formation of IAC.

•  From October 1984 to April 1992, served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Fox, Inc. and was responsible for the creation of Fox Broadcasting Company in addition to Fox’s motion picture operations.

•  Before joining Fox, served for 10 years as the Chairman and Chief Executive of Paramount Pictures Corporation. In March 1983, in addition to Paramount, became President of the conglomerate’s newly formed Entertainment and Communications Group, which included Simon & Schuster, Inc., Madison Square Garden Corporation and SEGA Enterprises, Inc.

•  Prior to joining Paramount, served as Vice President of Prime Time Television for ABC Entertainment.

•  Through his foundation he supported projects for Roundabout Theatre Company, Signature Theatre, The Public Theater, and Motion Picture & Television Fund, and is creating Little Island, a park and performance center in the Hudson River.

•  Director of The Coca-Cola Company since April 2002.

•  Member of The Business Council.

  

LOGO

AGE: (82)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2020

CHAIRMAN AND SENIOR

EXECUTIVE OF IAC

 First

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Serves as Chairman and Senior Executive of IAC. Served as Chief Executive Officer of Fox, Inc. from 1984 to 1992, responsible for the creation of Fox Broadcasting Company, and Fox’s motion picture operations. Prior to Fox, served for 10 years as Chief Executive Officer of Paramount Pictures Corporation.

Finance experience—Extensive experience in financings, mergers, acquisitions, investments and strategic transactions, including transactions with Silver King Broadcasting, QVC, Inc., Ticketmaster Entertainment, Inc. and Home Shopping Network, Inc. Served on the Finance Committee of Graham Holdings Company.

Industry experience—Extensive experience in the media and Internet sectors, including experience at IAC, with businesses in the marketing and technology industries, at Expedia Group, Inc., which empowers travelers through technology with tools to efficiently research, plan, book and experience travel, and at TripAdvisor, Inc., which operates the flagship TripAdvisor-branded websites and numerous other travel brands.

Public company directorship experience—Director and member of various board committees of several public companies.

 

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

  Became a

29


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

Name (age)

ALEXIS M. HERMAN

 
Principal Occupation and Other Directorships
 Director
Robert H. Baldwin (60)Chief Design and Construction Officer of the Company since August 2007. President of Project CC, LLC, the managing member of CityCenter Holdings, LLC, since March 2005, and President and Chief Executive Officer of Project CC, LLC since August 2007. Previously President and Chief Executive Officer of Mirage Resorts, Incorporated from June 2000 to August 2007. President and Chief Executive Officer of Bellagio, LLC or its predecessor from June 1996 to March 2005.2000
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — former Chief Executive Officer of Bellagio, LLC and of Mirage Resorts, Incorporated, and current President and Chief Executive Officer of the CityCenter joint venture managing entity
•   Industry experience — has held chief executive officer and various other leadership positions in entities involved in the gaming and resort industry for many years
William A. Bible (66)President of the Nevada Resort Association from 1999 to March 2010, prior to joining the Company’s Board of Directors. Director of the Las Vegas Monorail Company from 2007 to 2008. Chairman of the Nevada State Gaming Control Board from 1988 to 1998. Various positions as a state official overseeing financial matters from 1971 to 1988, including, after 1983, Director of Administration and Chief of the Budget Division (State Budget Director). Current or former director, officer or management trustee of a number of private businesses or trusts.2010
Director qualifications:
•   Finance experience — former state official overseeing financial matters
•   Industry experience — former president of a gaming and resort industry advocacy group
•   Government experience — chairman of Nevada gaming regulatory body for 10 years; various positions within the Nevada state government overseeing financial matters
Mr. Bible is Chair of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and a member of our Audit Committee and Executive Committee. Mr. Bible also acts as the Audit Committee’s liaison to the Compliance Committee of the Company and attends Compliance Committee meetings in this role.


8


First
Became a
Name (age)

Principal Occupation and Occupation/Other Directorships

Director
Burton M. Cohen (87)Former consultant for the hotel and gaming industry. Involved in the Las Vegas hotel and casino industry since 1966. Former president of various Las Vegas hotels, overseeing both the development and operations of several hotels. Additionally, past two-term president of the Nevada Resort Association and past board member of the Las Vegas Convention and Visitors Authority.2010
Director qualifications:

•  Leadership experience — former president of various hotels and casinos

•   Industry experience — involved in the Las Vegas hotel and casino industry for over 40 years; former president of a gaming and resort industry advocacy group; former board member of Las Vegas marketing organization
Mr. Cohen is a member of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Diversity and Community Affairs Committee.
Willie D. Davis (76)President and director of All-Pro Broadcasting, Inc., an AM and FM radio broadcasting company, for over 25 years. Director and member of the Audit Committee of Fidelity National Financial, Inc. Previously a director of Alliance Bancshares California, Checkers Drive-In Restaurants, Inc., Dow Chemical Company, Johnson Controls, Inc., Kmart Corp., Manpower Inc., Sara Lee Corp., Strong Financial Corp. and Wisconsin Energy Corp.1989
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — president of a broadcasting company
•   Finance experience — audit committee member of a public national bank
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of a public national bank; formerly a board member of several public companies
Mr. Davis is a member of our Compensation Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and Diversity and Community Affairs Committee.

9


First
Became a
Name (age)
Principal Occupation and Other Directorships
Director
Alexis M. Herman (63)Chair and Chief Executive Officer of New Ventures LLC, a corporate consulting company, since 2001.

  Lead Director, Chair of the Governance and Nominating Committee, and member of the AuditTechnology Committee, CompensationFinance Committee, and Executive Committee of Cummins Inc.

  Director and member of the Personnel Committee and Chairmember of the Corporate Governance Committee of Entergy Corp.

  Director and member of the Compensation Committee and Chair of the Public Issues and Diversity Review Committee of The Coca-Cola Company. Serves as Chair of the Diversity & Inclusion Business Advisory Board of Sodexo, Inc. and as Chair of Toyota Motor Corporation’s North American Diversity Advisory Board.

  United States Secretary of Labor from 1997 to 2001.

  Member of the Board of Trustees of the National Urban League, a civil rights organization.

2002
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — Chief Executive Officer of a consulting firm; former United States Secretary of Labor;organization, and member of the Board of Trustees of a civil rights organizationToyota Technological Institute at Chicago University.

•  President of the Dorothy I. Height Education Foundation and Co-Chair of the Presidential Leadership Scholars Initiative.

  

LOGO

AGE: (76)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2002

CHAIR AND CHIEF

EXECUTIVE OFFICER OF

NEW VENTURES LLC

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Chief Executive Officer of a consulting firm; former United States Secretary of Labor; member of the board of trustees of a civil rights organization.

Finance experience—Member of the finance committee of a public company that designs, manufactures, sells and services diesel engines and related technology around the world.

Government experience—Former United States Secretary of Labor.

Public company directorship experience—Director and member of various board committees of several public companies; member of advisory boards to public companies.

30 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

WILLIAM J. HORNBUCKLE

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Finance experience — memberChief Executive Officer and President of the audit committeeCompany since July 2020 and Acting Chief Executive Officer and President from March 2020 through July 2020.

•  Formerly President and Chief Operating Officer of the Company from March 2019 to March 2020, President since December 2012 and Chief Customer Development Officer since December 2018.

•  Chairperson of MGM China from 2020 to May 2023 and Co-Chairman since May 2023. Director of MGM China since 2011; previously a public company that designs, manufactures, sellsdirector of MGM Growth Properties LLC from 2016 through March 2020.

•  Previously served as Director of PLAYSTUDIOS, Inc. from June 2021 to December 2021.

•  Chief Marketing Officer of the Company from August 2009 to August 2014.

•  Founder and services diesel enginesBoard Member of GBank Financial Holdings from March 2007 through the present and related technology aroundChair of the world

Compensation Committee.

•  President and Chief Operating Officer of Mandalay Bay Resort & Casino in Las Vegas from April 2005 to August 2009.

•  Previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of MGM MIRAGE-Europe, where he worked on the development of MGM’s gaming operations in the United Kingdom.

•  Previously served as President and Chief Operating Officer of MGM Grand Hotel & Casino and of Caesars Palace, Las Vegas.

•  Spent the majority of his earlier career with Mirage Resorts Inc. in various senior management positions, including the Vice President of Hotel Operations of Golden Nugget, the Vice President of Hotel Operations of the Mirage, the President of Laughlin, the Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of Treasure Island and the Executive Vice President of Operations of MGM Grand, from 1986 to 1998.

•  Bachelor’s degree in hotel administration from the University of Nevada, Las Vegas.

•  Chair of the US Travel and Tourism Advisory Board since 2022.

  

LOGO

AGE: (66)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2020

CHIEF EXECUTIVE

OFFICER AND PRESIDENT

OF THE COMPANY

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Chief Executive Officer of the Company since July 2020 and has held several key executive positions with the Company for over 10 years.

Finance experience—Served as Chief Operating Officer of the Company and as Chief Operating Officer for many other reputable gaming-industry companies.

Industry experience—Served in various roles at the Company and other casino companies for over three decades.

Public company directorship experience—Current director and Co-Chairman of MGM China, a Hong Kong Stock Exchange listed company, and a former director of MGM Growth Properties LLC.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

31


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

MARY CHRIS JAMMET

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Government experience — formerFounder and principal of Bristol Partners, LLC.

•  Former Senior Vice President and portfolio manager responsible for $20 billion in assets for clients in the United States Secretaryand abroad, from 1998 until 2013, and equity research analyst focused on the gaming and lodging industry, from 1989 until 1998, at Legg Mason Global Asset Management (now Franklin Templeton), an international asset management firm.

•  Member of Labor

the Board of Directors for Adams Funds (publicly traded closed-end funds) since December 2020. Chair of the Audit Committee and member of the Nominating and Governance Committee, the Compensation Committee and the Executive Committee.

•  Former Independent Director for Payless ShoeSource Inc. from June 2018 to January 2019 and Chair of the Nominating and Governance Committee, Chair of the Corporate Social Responsibility Committee and Member of the Special Committee.

•  Member of the Finance Department Advisory Board Sellinger School of Business at Loyola University Maryland.

•  Received a CERT Certificate in Cybersecurity Oversight in 2020 from the CERT Division of the Software Engineering Institute at Carnegie Mellon University.

  

LOGO

AGE: (56)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2014

FORMER SENIOR VICE PRESIDENT, PORTFOLIO MANAGER AND EQUITY ANALYST AT LEGG MASON GLOBAL ASSET MANAGEMENT

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Former Senior Vice President of one of the largest international asset management firms.

Finance experience—Served as Senior Vice President and portfolio manager of a regulated financial services institution, responsible for, among other things, assessing the performance of companies and evaluating their financial statements.

Industry experience—Served as an equity analyst researching the gaming and lodging industries.

Public company directorship experience—Current Member of the Board of Directors for Adams Funds (publicly traded closed-end funds).

32 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

JOEY LEVIN

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  PublicChief Executive Officer and Director of IAC since June 2015.

•  Chairman of the Board of Directors of Angi Inc. (formerly ANGI Homeservices Inc.). Chief Executive Officer of Angi since October 2022.

•  Served in various roles at IAC since he joined the company directorship experience — directorin 2003 working in the Mergers & Acquisitions group.

•  Former CEO of Mindspark Interactive, a division of IAC, and memberhas led various businesses for IAC until his appointment to CEO and the Board of various board committeesDirectors in 2015.

•  Prior to joining IAC, worked in the Technology Mergers & Acquisitions group for Credit Suisse First Boston (now Credit Suisse) in San Francisco.

•  Previously served as Chairman of the Board of Vimeo Inc. from May 2021 to March 2023, Chairman of the Board of Match Group, Inc. from October 2015 to 2021 and Director of Match Group, Inc. through Sept. 2022. Also previously served as a Director of several public companies; member of advisory boardspublicly traded consumer technology companies including Groupon, Inc., LendingTree, Inc, and The Active Network through its IPO and up until its sale to public companies

Vista Equity Partners.

  

LOGO

AGE: (44)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2020

CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER

OF IAC & ANGI

  

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Chief Executive Officer of IAC, a leading media and internet company, and served as Chairman of the Board of Match Group, Inc., an internet and technology company with the largest global portfolio of online dating services, and ANGI Homeservices Inc., a global leader in home improvement.

Finance experience—Significant experience in financings, mergers, acquisitions, investments and strategic transactions through his various roles at IAC and in the Technology Mergers & Acquisition group for Credit Suisse.

Industry experience—Extensive experience in the media and Internet sectors, including experience at IAC, with businesses in the marketing and technology industries.

Public company directorship experience—Serves as a director of several public companies, including as Chairman of the Board of Directors for Match Group, Inc. and ANGI Homeservices Inc.

 Ms. Herman is Chair of our Diversity and Community Affairs Committee and a member of our Audit Committee and Executive Committee.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

  

33


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

Roland Hernandez (53)

ROSE MCKINNEY-JAMES

 Director, officer or partner and owner of minority interests in privately-held companies engaged in real estate, investment, media and security services for more than the past five years. Director and member of the Audit Committee and Finance Committee of The Ryland Group, Inc. Lead Director, Chair of the Nominating & Governance Committee, and member of the Executive Committee and Audit Committee of Vail Resorts, Inc. Director of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Director and member of the Nominating Committee of Sony Corporation. Director and Chairman of the Audit Committee of Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. from 1998 to June 2008. Formerly the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Telemundo Group, Inc. 2002
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — former Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of a Spanish-language television broadcast network

10


First
Became a
Name (age)

Principal Occupation and Occupation/Other Directorships

Director

•  Finance experience — audit committee and finance committee member of a real estate/home construction company, and audit committee member of a mountain resort company; formerly chairman of the audit committee of an international retail company

•   Industry experience — director of a mountain resort company
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of several public companies
Mr. Hernandez is our Lead Independent Director, Chair of our Audit Committee, and a member of our Diversity and Community Affairs Committee and Executive Committee.
Anthony Mandekic (69)Employed by, and Secretary and Treasurer of, Tracinda since 1976. Director and member of the Compensation Committee of Delta Petroleum Corporation.2006
Director qualifications:
•   Finance experience — over 30 years of experience as Treasurer of Tracinda
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of a public oil and gas company
Mr. Mandekic is Chair of our Compensation Committee and a member of our Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, Diversity and Community Affairs Committee, and Executive Committee.
Rose McKinney-James (59)Managing Principal of Energy Works Consulting LLC and McKinney James & Associates, providing consulting services regarding public affairs in the areas of energy, education, and environmental policy, in each case for more than the past five years.

•  Director of Ioneer Ltd. since January 2021, member of its Renumeration Committee and Chair of its Environmental Health Safety & Sustainability Committee.

•  Director of Pacific Premier Bancorp since March 2022, member of its Nominating and Governance Committee and Enterprise Risk Committee.

•  Serves on the Board of Directors of MGM Grand Detroit, LLC

•  Member of the Audit Committee and Chair of the CRA Committee of Toyota Financial Savings Bank.

•  Director of the National Association of Corporate Directors Pacific Southwest Chapter and Fellow of the National Association of Corporate Directors.

•  Director of CLEAResult and member of its Audit Committee from 2020 to 2023.

  Director of Marketing and External Affairs of Nevada State Bank Public Finance since 2007.from 2007 to 2013.

•  Former Director and Chair of the Board Governance and Nominating Committee and member of the Finance Committee of Employers Holdings, Inc. from 2005 to June 2013.

•  Emeritus Director and member of the Audit Committee and chair of the CRA Committee of Toyota Financial Savings Bank. Serves on the Board of Directors of MGM Grand Detroit, LLC. Chairman of the Board of Directors ofThree Square, Nevada Partners and a directorthe American Association of Blacks in Energy AABE.

•  Former Board Chair of The US Energy Foundation.Foundation from 2020 to 2022 and former Chair of its Governance and Nominating Committee.

  Formerly the President and Chief Executive Officer of the Corporation for Solar Technologies and Renewable Resources for five years.

  Former Commissioner with the Nevada Public Service Commission and former Director of the Nevada Department of Business and Industry.

2005

  

LOGO

AGE: (72)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2005

MANAGING PRINCIPAL OF ENERGY WORKS CONSULTING LLC AND MCKINNEY JAMES & ASSOCIATES

 

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Former President and CEO of a not-for-profit corporation focused on solar and renewable energy technologies; former leader of two Nevada state government agencies.

Finance experience—Finance committee member of a company that provides workers’ compensation insurance and services to small businesses; member of audit committee of Toyota Financial Savings Bank.

Industry experience—Former director of Mandalay Resort Group prior to its acquisition by the Company.

Government experience—Former leader of two Nevada state government agencies.

Public company directorship experience—Former director and board committee member of a company that provides workers’ compensation insurance and services to small businesses.

34 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

KEITH A. MEISTER

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Founder, Managing Partner & Chief Investment Officer of Corvex Management LP since 2010.

•  Director and Chairman of CM Life Sciences, Inc., CM Life Sciences II Inc. and CM Life Sciences III Inc. prior to 2022.

•  Director of Sema4 Holdings from January 2022 through the present and a member of its Audit Committee.

•  Director of BetMGM since May 2020.

•  Senior Managing Director of the General Partners of Icahn Partners L.P. and affiliated funds from November 2004 to August 2010.

•  Co-President of J Net Ventures from January 2000 through September 2001.

•  Prior to launching J Net Ventures, Mr. Meister worked at NorthStar Capital and Lazard Freres.

•  Previously served as a director on numerous other public boards including: Yum! Brands, Inc., The Williams Companies, The ADT Corporation, Ralcorp Holdings and Motorola, Inc./Motorola Mobility, Inc., among others.

•  Chairman of the Board of Directors for Harlem Children’s Zone and a member of the board of trustees for the American Museum of Natural History.

  Director qualifications:

LOGO

AGE: (51)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2019

FOUNDER, MANAGING PARTNER & CHIEF INVESTMENT OFFICER OF CORVEX MANAGEMENT LP

 

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Operational and management expertise as managing partner and executive officer of an investment firm and diversified holding company.

Finance experience—Expertise in finance, capital markets, strategic development and risk management.

Public company directorship experience—Director and board committee member of public companies in a variety of industries.

Industry Experience—Served as board member of a company with assets and operations in the casino and gaming industry.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

35


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

PAUL SALEM

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Co-Founder and CEO of Salem Capital Management (“SCM”) since 2019 and Executive Director of the Salem Foundation.

•  Senior Managing Director Emeritus, Providence Equity Partners (“Providence”) since 2019 and with Providence from 1992 – 2019, which specializes in investing in the media, communications, education and information industries. Established Providence’s European office in 1999, and co-founded Benefit Street Partners in 2008 (the debt capital markets business of Providence).

•  Previously served as a director of Grupo TorreSur, Asurion, Eircom, Madison River Telecom, MetroNet (formerly AT&T Canada), PanAmSat, Tele1 Europe, Verio, Wired Magazine, Education Management Corporation and several other Providence investments.

•  Prior to joining Providence in 1992, worked for Morgan Stanley in corporate finance and mergers and acquisitions and prior to Morgan Stanley spent four years with Prudential Investment Corporation.

•  Chair of the Board of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute, the world’s leader in ocean discovery and research.

•  Former Chair of Year Up, a national non-profit focused on closing the opportunity divide for urban young adults, and a former board member of Edesia Global Nutrition, a non-profit dedicated to treating and preventing malnutrition in the world’s most vulnerable populations.

•  Serves on the advisory board of the Carney Institute for Brain Science at Brown University.

  •   Leadership experience — former President and CEO of a not-for-profit corporation focused on solar and renewable energy technologies; former leader of two Nevada state government agencies

LOGO

AGE: (60)

CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD SINCE 2020 AND DIRECTOR SINCE 2018

SENIOR MANAGING DIRECTOR EMERITUS AT PROVIDENCE EQUITY PARTNERS

  

11

Director Qualifications


Leadership experience—Current Senior Managing Director Emeritus at Providence, a premier global asset management firm with approximately $40 billion in assets under management; established the Providence London office in 1999 and helped create Benefit Street Partners, Providence’s credit affiliate that was sold to Franklin Templeton in Q1 2019.

Finance experience—Various progressive roles at Providence Equity since 1992, which specializes in investing in the media, communications, education and information industries by employing a variety of financing structures and target equity investments and bringing industry, financial, operational and leadership expertise to portfolio companies.

Public company directorship experience—Former director of public company in the education industry, former Chairman of MGM Growth Properties LLC.

36 

 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

 


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

JAN G. SWARTZ

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Executive Vice President of Strategic Operations, Carnival Corporation. Previously Group President of Holland America Group of Carnival Corporation, leading Princess Cruises, Holland America Line, Seabourn and Carnival Australia from 2020-2023. Previously, Group President of Princess Cruises and Carnival Australia from 2016-2020. President, Princess Cruises from 2013-2016 and Executive Vice President, Sales, Marketing and Customer Service, Princess Cruises from 2008-2013. Previously served in progressive roles at Princess Cruises starting in 2001 as the Vice President of Strategy and Business Development and led the deal evaluation and integration efforts in connection with Carnival Corporation’s acquisition of P&O Princess in 2002.

•  Led Princess Cruises expansion throughout Asia, opening 11 offices across China, Japan, Taiwan, Singapore, Hong Kong and Korea.

•  Co-led Carnival Corporation’s Ocean Medallion digital transformation initiative, which has won the 2018 Gold New York Design Award for Digital IoT, a CES 2019 Innovation Award Honoree and was a finalist for a 2019 Edison Award for its wearable device and guest experience platform available today on Princess ships.

•  Prior to joining Carnival Corporation, served as Chief Executive Officer of MXG Media from 1999 to 2000.

•  During the 1992-1999 period, served as an associate consultant, consultant and manager at Bain & Company, Inc.

  

LOGO

AGE: (54)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2018

GROUP PRESIDENT, HOLLAND AMERICA GROUP of CARNIVAL CORPORATION SERVING PRINCESS CRUISES, HOLLAND AMERICA LINE, SEABOURN AND P&O AUSTRALIA

 First

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Current EVP Strategic Operations at Carnival Corporation. Previously Group President at Carnival Corporation, the world’s largest leisure travel company leading four of Carnival Corporation’s nine cruise brands; former Chief Executive Officer of MXG Media, an interactive entertainment Company; President of the Princess Cruises Community Foundation.

Finance experience—Various progressive roles at Carnival Corporation involving oversight of several brands’ financial performance.

Industry experience—Currently leads Strategy and Land operations including six private destinations and six Alaska wilderness lodges at the world’s largest leisure travel company; oversaw the international expansion of the cruise category throughout Asia and has worked with leading consumer and service companies on growth and digital transformation strategies.

 

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

  Became a

37


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

Name (age)

DANIEL J. TAYLOR

 
Principal Occupation and Other Directorships
 Director
•   Finance experience — finance committee member of a company that provides workers’ compensation insurance and services to small businesses
•   Industry experience — former director of Mandalay Resort Group prior to its acquisition by the Company
•   Government experience — former leader of two Nevada state government agencies
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of a company that provides workers’ compensation insurance and services to small businesses
Ms. McKinney-James is a member of our Audit Committee and Compensation Committee.
James J. Murren (49)Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since December 2008 and President since December 1999. Chief Operating Officer from August 2007 through December 2008. Prior to that, Chief Financial Officer from January 1998 to August 2007 and Treasurer from November 2001 to August 2007. Director and member of the Compensation Committee and the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of Delta Petroleum Corporation. Director of the Nevada Cancer Institute and the American Gaming Association. Prior to joining the Company, worked in the financial industry for over 10 years, serving as Managing Director and Co-Director of Research for Deutsche Morgan Grenfell and Director of Research and Managing Director for Deutsche Bank.1998
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company; has held key executive positions with the Company for over 10 years; co-founder, current director and board committee member of a non-profit organization providing cancer research and care
•   Finance experience — former Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of the Company; served as Managing Director and Co-Director of Research for Deutsche Morgan Grenfell and Director of Research and Managing Director for Deutsche Bank
•   Industry experience — involved in the Las Vegas hotel and casino industry for over 10 years; director of a gaming and resort industry advocacy group
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of a public oil and gas company
Mr. Murren is Chairman of our Board and Chair of our Executive Committee.

12


First
Became a
Name (age)

Principal Occupation and Occupation/Other Directorships

Director
Daniel J. Taylor (54)

•  Employed as an executive of Tracinda Corporation from 2007 through 2019.

•  Director of MGM China. Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Light Efficient Design, a division of TADD LLC since 2007.July 2014, a manufacturer and distributor of LED lighting products and EV charging stations.

  President of Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Inc. (“MGM Studios”) from April 2005 to January 2006 and Senior Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of MGM Studios from June 1998 to April 2005.

•  Tax Manager and CPA specializing in the entertainment and gaming practice at Arthur Andersen & Co. from 1978 to 1985.

  Director of Inforte Corp. from October 2005 to 2007.

•  Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Delta Petroleum Corporation sincefrom May 2009 to August 2012 (and a director sincefrom February 2008)2008 to August 2012), and a former member of the Audit Committee and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of such company.

2007

  

LOGO

AGE: (67)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2007

DIRECTOR OF MGM GROWTH PROPERTIES SINCE 2016 DIRECTOR OF MGM CHINA SINCE 2020

 

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience—Chairman of the Board of a manufacturer and distributor of LED lighting products; former President of a motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company.

Finance experience—Former Chief Financial Officer of a motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company; former Vice President—Taxes of a motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company; former tax manager at a public accounting firm.

Industry experience—Former Tax Manager specializing in the entertainment and gaming practice at Arthur Andersen & Co.

Public company directorship experience—Former director and board committee member of a public oil and gas company; former director of a management consulting company; former director of MGM Growth Properties LLC and current director of MGM China, a Hong Kong Stock Exchange listed company.

38 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

BEN WINSTON

Principal Occupation/Other Directorships

•  Award-winning Producer, Director and Founding Partner of Fulwell 73, which specializes in making high quality television and film productions, since 2005.

•  Executive producer of many television and film productions including, “The Late Show with James Corden” from 2015 to 2023, “The Grammy Awards,” for CBS, “The Kardashians,” for Hulu, “Carpool Karaoke” for Apple TV, and “Friends” The Reunion for HBO MAX.

•  Has created and produced several music specials for various award winning artists and oversaw “Global Citizen: Mandela 100” in South Africa in 2018.

•  13 time Emmy winner, 33 time Emmy nominee, 5 time Critics Choice Award Winner, 3 time Brit Award winner, 2 time PGA Award Winner, Rose D’or winner, Bafta Winner, Grammy nominee.

  Director qualifications:

LOGO

AGE: (42)

DIRECTOR SINCE 2023

PRODUCER, DIRECTOR AND FOUNDING PARTNER OF FULWELL 73

 

Director Qualifications

Leadership experience— Founding Partner of Fulwell 73, an international television, film and production company that operates across a wide range of genres and across all media platforms, including theatrical, broadcast and digital.

Industry experience—Award-winning director and producer of TV shows, films, documentaries, concerts, events, and music videos.

 

THE BOARD UNANIMOUSLY RECOMMENDS YOU VOTE

“FOR” THE ELECTION OF THE NOMINEES LISTED ABOVE BASED UPON THEIR

RESPECTIVE EXPERIENCES, QUALIFICATIONS AND SKILLS IDENTIFIED ABOVE.

 •   Leadership experience — former president of a motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company; current chairman of the board of a public oil and gas company

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

  
•   Finance experience — former chief financial officer of a motion picture, television, home video, and theatrical production and distribution company
•   Public company directorship experience — director and board committee member of a public oil and gas company; former director of a management consulting company
Mr. Taylor is a member of our Compensation Committee, Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, and Executive Committee.
Melvin B. Wolzinger (90)Former principal owner of various privately held restaurants and gaming establishments in Las Vegas. Former director and member of the Loan Committee of Colonial Bank. Member of the Board of Trustees of the University of Nevada Las Vegas Foundation.2000
Director qualifications:
•   Leadership experience — former owner of various restaurants and gaming establishments; member of the board of trustees of a university foundation; retired Lieutenant Colonel in the U.S. Air Force
•   Finance experience — former loan committee member of a national bank
•   Industry experience — long-time owner of Las Vegas restaurants and gaming establishments; received gaming license in 1946 prior to the formation of the Nevada Gaming Control Board; director of Mirage Resorts Incorporated or its predecessor from 1973-2000
Mr. Wolzinger is a member of our Compensation Committee and Diversity and Community Affairs Committee.

39


In making the determination to nominate the above directors, the Board of Directors considered the service by Ms. Herman and Mr. Hernandez on other public company boards, as described in their biographies above, including Mr. Hernandez’s service on the board of directors of Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc. Generally, the Board believes that experience serving on other public company boards augments the Board’s effectiveness.

Proposals Requiring Your Vote

PROPOSAL NO. 2 RATIFICATION OF SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The BoardAudit Committee has

13


determined that Mr. Hernandez’s and Ms. Herman’s other board service should not interfere with their ability to fulfill their commitment selected Deloitte & Touche LLP to serve on the Board of Directors of the Company.
Board Diversity
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers diversity when assessing the appropriateness of Board membership. Though diversity is not defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines or in the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s charter, each of which can be found under their respective captions atwww.mgmresorts.com/corporategovernance, diversity is broadly interpreted by the Board to include viewpoints, background, experience, industry knowledgeas our independent registered public accounting firm for 2024. For 2023, Deloitte & Touche LLP audited and geography, as well as more traditional characteristics of diversity, such as race and gender. We believe that our commitment to diversity is demonstrated by the current membership of our Board and the varied backgrounds and skill sets of our directors.
Stockholder Agreements
Company Stock Purchase and Support Agreement.  In August 2007, we entered into a Company Stock Purchase and Support Agreement, as amended in October 2007, with Infinity World Investments LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Infinity World”) and an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of Dubai World, a Dubai, United Arab Emirates government decree entity (“Dubai World”).
The agreement provides that, as long as Infinity World and its affiliates (collectively, the “Infinity World group”) beneficially own at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock, whenever we propose to sell shares of our Common Stock or other securities of the Company exercisable for or convertible into Common Stock (except for shares or other securities issued under an employee benefit plan), we will grant a preemptive right (which may be transferred to an affiliate of Infinity World) to acquire that number of shares needed to maintain the percentage ownership of the Infinity World group as calculated at the time we propose to sell shares. Infinity World elected not to exercise this right in connection with both our October 2010 underwritten public offering of 40,900,000 shares of Common Stock and the issuance of an additional 6,135,000 shares of Common Stock pursuant to the underwriters’ over-allotment option, and our April 2010 offering of $1 billion in aggregate principal amount of 4.25% convertible senior notes and an over-allotment option of $150 million of additional aggregate principal amount of notes. In addition, under the agreement, Infinity World has agreed that the Infinity World group will not acquire beneficial ownership of more than 20% of our outstanding shares, subject to certain exceptions.
The agreement also provides that as long as the Infinity World group owns at least 5% of our outstanding Common Stock and the joint venture agreement contemplated under the agreement has not been terminated, Infinity World will have the right, subject to applicable regulatory approvals, to designate one nominee for election to our Board of Directors. If the Infinity World group beneficially owns at least 12% of our outstanding Common Stock, then Infinity World will have the right to designate a number of nominees for election to our Board of Directors equal to the product (rounded down to the nearest whole number) of (x) the percentage of outstanding shares owned by the Infinity World group multiplied by (y) the total number of directors then authorized to serverendered opinions on our Boardfinancial statements and internal control over financial reporting.

A representative of Directors. Based upon a Schedule 13D/A filed January 20, 2011 with the SEC by the Infinity World group, it owned 26,048,738 shares of our Common Stock, or approximately 5.3% of the outstanding shares. Infinity World has not, as yet, designated a nominee for the Board of Directors. If Infinity World designates a nominee for election to our Board of Directors afterDeloitte & Touche LLP will attend the Annual Meeting, our Board of Directors will in accordance with the agreement, increase the authorized number of directors, if needed, and appoint the nominee to serve on the Board until the next meeting of stockholders at which directors are to be elected.

Stockholder Support Agreement.  In August 2007, Infinity World also entered into a Stockholder Support Agreement with Tracinda. Under this agreement, Tracinda has agreed to vote its shares of our Common Stock in favor of Infinity World’s nominee(s) to the Board of Directors, subject to applicable regulatory approvals.
Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act requires the Company’s executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of the Company’s Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the SEC. The reporting officers, directors and 10% stockholders are also required to furnish the


14


Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms that they file. Based solely upon a review of these filings and written representations from such directors, officers and 10% stockholders, we believe that all required Section 16(a) reports were timely filed during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, with the exception that one report covering one transaction was filed late by each of Rick Arpin, William A. Bible, Burton M. Cohen, Willie D. Davis, Kenny C. Guinn, Alexis M. Herman, Roland Hernandez, Anthony Mandekic, Rose McKinney-James, Daniel J. Taylor and Melvin B. Wolzinger.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Corporate Governance Guidelines
The Board of Directors has adopted corporate governance guidelines for the Company (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”) setting forth the general principles governing the conduct of the Company’s business and the role, functions, duties and responsibilities of the Board, including, but not limited to, such matters as (i) Board composition and membership criteria, (ii) compensation, (iii) director orientation and continuing education, (iv) Board committees, (v) Board leadership, (vi) director access to officers, employees and independent advisors, (vii) management succession and (viii) annual performance evaluations of the Board and its committees. The Company believes that these guidelines are in compliance with the listing standards adopted in 2003 by the NYSE. The Corporate Governance Guidelines are posted and maintained on the Company’s website atwww.mgmresorts.com/corporategovernanceunder the caption “Corporate Governance Guidelines,” and a copy will be made available to any stockholder who requests it in writing to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications.
Code of Conduct
The Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy (the “Code of Conduct”) that applies to all of the Company’s directors, officers and employees, including our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and chief accounting officer. The Code of Conduct also applies to all applicable contractors and other agents performing services for or conducting work on behalf of the Company. The Code of Conduct establishes policies and procedures that the Board believes promote the highest standards of integrity, compliance with the law and personal accountability. The Code of Conduct is posted on the Company’s website atwww.mgmresorts.com/codeofconductunder the caption “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy.” A summary of amendments and waivers to the Code of Conduct, if any, is also posted at the same website location atwww.mgmresorts.com/codeofconductunder the general heading “Governance Documents.” The Code of Conduct is made available to all of our employees in various formats. It is specifically provided to new directors, officers and key employees and is distributed annually to all of our directors, officers and key employees, each of whom is required to acknowledge its receipt and his or her understanding thereof and agreement to adhere to the principles contained therein. Additionally, the Company will provide a copy of the Code of Conduct, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it in writing to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications.
Director Independence
For a director to be considered independent, the Board must determine that the director does not have any direct or indirect material relationships with the Company. The Board has established guidelines to assist in determining director independence, which conform to the independence requirements established by the NYSE’s listing standards. Using these guidelines, which are set forth in Section II of the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, and considering information provided by each director and all facts and circumstances the Board deemed relevant, the Board has determined that Ms. Herman, Ms. McKinney-James and Messrs. Bible, Cohen, Davis, Hernandez, Kerkorian (who will cease to be a director upon expiration of his current term), Mandekic, Taylor, and Wolzinger, who constitute a majority of the Board, are independent within the meaning of the rules of the NYSE. The Board had also determined that Governor Kenny C. Guinn and Dr. Joseph H. Sugerman met the


15


standards of independence during the periods of their respective service on the Board. In making these determinations, the Board considered that Messrs. Mandekic, Murren and Taylor all serve on the Board of Directors of Delta Petroleum Corporation, with Messrs. Mandekic and Murren serving as members of its compensation committee, all three are designated as independent directors of that corporation by its board of directors, and there is no director interlock because none of the Company’s directors is an officer of Delta Petroleum Corporation.
All members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee must be independent directors as defined in the Corporate Governance Guidelines. For the purposes of determining whether a director who is a member of the Audit Committee is independent, the Company applies additional independence standards, including those of the SEC set forth inRule 10A-3 of the Exchange Act, and the corporate governance rules of the NYSE applicable to audit committee composition. The Board has determined that all members of the Audit Committee, Compensation Committee and Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are independent and satisfy the relevant Company, NYSE and SEC additional requirements for the members of such committees.
Information Regarding the Board and Board Committees
Board of Directors.  The Board of Directors currently consists of 12 directors. Governor Kenny C. Guinn, who served on the Board since 2007, passed away in July 2010. Dr. Joseph H. Sugerman resigned from the Board of Directors effective February 25, 2010. William A. Bible and Burton M. Cohen joined the Board on March 8, 2010 and April 13, 2010, respectively. Kirk Kerkorian, a current director, will cease to be a director upon expiration of his current term. The Board of Directors held 14 meetings during 2010. During 2010, each member of the Board of Directors except Mr. Kerkorian attended at least 75% of the aggregate of the total number of meetings held by the Board of Directors and the total number of meetings held by the committees on which he or she served during the period of his or her service.
Directors are expected to attend each annual meeting of stockholders. All of the members of the Board of Directors attended last year’s annual meeting except Mr. Kerkorian.
Executive Committee.  The Executive Committee’s functions include, among other things, acting to approve routine but necessary matters between Board meetings and acting in areas requiring extraordinary or expeditious action when the entire Board cannot be convened. Actions of the Executive Committee are disclosed to the full Board no later than at the next meeting of the full Board. The current members of the Executive Committee are James J. Murren (Chair), William A. Bible, Alexis M. Herman, Roland Hernandez, Anthony Mandekic and Daniel J. Taylor. The Executive Committee held 2 meetings during 2010.
Audit Committee.  For a complete discussion of the functions of the Audit Committee, see “Corporate Governance — Audit Committee” below. The current members of the Audit Committee are Roland Hernandez (Chair), William A. Bible, Alexis M. Herman and Rose McKinney-James. The Audit Committee held 8 meetings during 2010.
Compensation Committee.  For a complete discussion of the functions of the Compensation Committee, see “Corporate Governance — Compensation Committee” below. The current members of the Compensation Committee are Anthony Mandekic (Chair), Willie D. Davis, Rose McKinney-James, Daniel J. Taylor and Melvin B. Wolzinger. The Compensation Committee held 12 meetings during 2010.
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee.  For a complete discussion of the functions of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, see “Corporate Governance — Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee” below. The current members of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee are William A. Bible (Chair), Burton M. Cohen, Willie D. Davis, Anthony Mandekic and Daniel J. Taylor. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee held 10 meetings during 2010. Mr. Bible replaced Governor Kenny C. Guinn as the Chairman of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in July 2010.
Diversity and Community Affairs Committee.  The functions of the Diversity and Community Affairs Committee include, among other things, reviewing and monitoring the implementation of the Company’s diversity and philanthropy initiatives. The current members of the Diversity and Community Affairs Committee are Alexis


16


M. Herman (Chair), Burton M. Cohen, Willie D. Davis, Roland Hernandez, Anthony Mandekic and Melvin B. Wolzinger. The Diversity and Community Affairs Committee held 6 meetings during 2010.
Board Leadership Structure
Our Corporate Governance Guidelines provide that the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer may be filled by the same or different individuals, which gives the Board the flexibility to determine whether these roles should be combined or separated based on the Company’s circumstances and needs at any given time. The Board has no formal policy regarding whether to combine or separate the position of Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, but generally believes that such decisions should be made in the context of succession planning. Currently, the Chief Executive Officer of the Company, James J. Murren, also serves as the Chairman of the Board. The Board believes that the Company and its stockholders are best served by having Mr. Murren act in both positions, as he is most familiar with our business and the challenges the Company faces in the current environment. Additionally, his experience and expertise make him best suited to set agendas (in consultation with the Lead Independent Director) for, and lead discussions of, strategic matters affecting the Company at this time. Further, our Corporate Governance Guidelines, policies and practices, combined with the strength of our independent directors and the role of the Lead Independent Director (discussed below), minimize any potential conflicts that may result from combining the roles of Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board.
In early 2010, the Board replaced the role of Presiding Director with that of Lead Independent Director, elected Mr. Hernandez to serve in this position, and enumerated specific responsibilities of the Lead Independent Director. Among other things, the Lead Independent Director is responsible for convening, chairing and setting the agenda for non-management executive sessions, acting as a liaison between directors and management, consulting with the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board regarding the agenda of Board and Executive Committee meetings and, on behalf of and at the discretion of the Board, meeting with stockholders and speaking on behalf of the Board in circumstances where it is appropriate for the Board to have a voice distinct from that of management.
In accordance with the applicable rules of the NYSE, the Board of Directors schedules regular executive sessions of the non-management directors at which directors have an opportunity to meet outside the presence of management. The non-management directors also have the opportunity to convene in executive sessions at every meeting of the Board, in their discretion. Such sessions are chaired by Mr. Hernandez, as the Lead Independent Director. The Board of Directors has establishedmake a process for stockholdersstatement if they desire to do so, and other interested parties to communicate with the Lead Independent Director, which is set forth in “Stockholder and Interested Parties Communications with Directors” below.
Director Emeritus
The Board of Directors has adopted a policy in its Corporate Governance Guidelines for the designation of “Director Emeritus” in exceptional circumstances to recognize contributions of an unusually valuable nature to the Company by a former director. A Director Emeritus may be invited by the Board in its discretion to attend Board or committee meetings and may be asked to provide advice and counsel to the Board and members of the Company’s senior management team. However, a Director Emeritus may not vote on any business coming before the Board of Directors, nor shall he or she be counted as a member of the Board of Directors for the purpose of determining a quorum or for any other purpose. While the Board may determine to compensate a Director Emeritus for his or her advisory and consulting services and a Director Emeritus may be reimbursed for reasonable expenses incurred to attend Board and committee meetings, a Director Emeritus shall not be compensated for attendance at such meetings. A Director Emeritus shall not be deemed to be a member of the Board of Directors or a “director” as that term is used in the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, this Proxy Statement, or otherwise.
Kirk Kerkorian, one of our current directors, will cease to be a director upon expiration of his current term. The Board intends to grant Mr. Kerkorian the status of Director Emeritus following the Annual Meeting. The Board believes that Mr. Kerkorian — the founder of the Company, a member of our Board of Directors since 1987, and an investor in the Las Vegas hotel and casino industry for over 50 years — should serve as Director Emeritus because of his vast experience in our industry and personal, in-depth knowledge of our Company, its history and our business.


17


Continuing Education for Directors
The Company is committed to ensuring that its directors remain informed with respect to best practices in corporate governance. Each Director is affordedhave the opportunity to meet with membersrespond to appropriate questions.

We are asking our stockholders to ratify the selection of the senior management of the Company, visit the Company’s facilities and consult with independent advisorsDeloitte & Touche LLP as necessary or appropriate. Directors are expected to undertake continuing education to properly perform their duties. In 2010, the Board of Directors and each of the Board committees participated in customized director education sessions that addressed relevant Dodd-Frank Act governance provisions, related SEC rule changes and fiduciary duties and shareholder relations and accountability in the changing business and regulatory environment. Directors were presented with materials on these subjects and engaged in discussions on each of the topics during these sessions.

Risk Oversight
Our Board of Directors has overall responsibility for overseeing the management of the most significant risks facing the Company. As part of its decision-making processes and meetings, our Board of Directors engages in regular discussions regarding risk related to the enterprise and management, focusing particularly on the areas of financial risk, regulatory and compliance risk and operational and strategic risk. Our management’s assessment of material risks facing the Company are presented by the Company’s officers and its legal counsel to the Board at our regularly scheduled Board meetings for the Board’s discussion and consideration in its oversight of the Company. When necessary, our Board convenes for special meetings to discuss important decisions facing the Company. The Board considers short-term and long-term risks when providing direction to the Company in connection with these important decisions, and risk planning is a central part of the calculus in all of the Board’s decision making.
While the Board of Directors has the ultimate oversight responsibility for the risk management process, various committees of the Board also share in such responsibility. As part of their delegated areas of responsibility, each of the Board committees reviews and discusses in more detail specific risk topics under its area of responsibility consistent with its charter and such other responsibilities as may be delegated to them by the Board of Directors from time to time. In particular, the Audit Committee focuses on significant risk exposures faced by the Company, including general business risk, financial risk, internal controls, regulatory and compliance matters, and material litigation and potential disputes, and assesses the steps and processes management has implemented to monitor, controland/or minimize such exposures. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews at least annually the Company’s compensation policies and practices for executives, management employees and employees generally as they relate to the Company’s risk management practices, including the incentives established for risk-taking and the manner in which risks arising out of the Company’s compensation policies and practices are monitored and mitigated and any adjustments of compensation policies and practices that should be made to address changes in the Company’s risk profile. Likewise, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee has the responsibility of reviewing the Company’s corporate governance practices, including Board composition and succession planning, and regularly assesses the Company’s preparation to address risks related to these areas as well as the other areas under its responsibility.
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee’s responsibilities are described in a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter is posted on the Company’s website atwww.mgmresorts.com/auditcommittee under the caption “Audit Committee Charter,” and a copy will be made available, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it in writing.
The current members of the Audit Committee are Roland Hernandez (Chair), William A. Bible, Alexis M. Herman and Rose McKinney-James. The Audit Committee is responsible for providing independent, objective oversight of the Company’s financial reporting system. Among its various activities, the Audit Committee reviews:
1. the adequacy of the Company’s internal controls and financial reporting process and the reliability of the Company’s financial statements;
2. the independence and performance of the Company’s internal auditors and independent registered public accounting firm; and
3. the Company’s compliance with legal and regulatory requirements.


18


The Audit Committee also prepares the report that is required to be included in the Proxy Statement. In addition, the Audit Committee appoints the independent registered public accounting firm; reviews with such firm the plan, scope and results of the audit, and the fees for the services performed; and periodically reviews such firm’s performance and independence from management.
Under written guidelines adoptedfirm. Although ratification is not required by our bylaws or otherwise, the Board is submitting the selection of Directors in connection with the Company’s Code of Conduct, the Audit Committee, or its designated member, is requiredDeloitte & Touche LLP to review reports of potential conflicts of interest involving directors and executive officers of the Company. With respect to such reports, it is the Audit Committee’s responsibility to determine whether a conflict exists and whether or not to waive the conflict. In determining whether a conflict of interest exists, the Audit Committee considers the materiality of the relationship between the third party and the Company pursuant to standards set forth in written guidelines. In determining whether a conflict of interest should be waived, the Audit Committee considers the effectiveness of any safeguards that may be implemented, the feasibility of the individual’s recusal in matters that affect the Company and the third party, and the materiality of lost servicesour stockholders for the Company that may result from the recusal.
The Audit Committee meets regularly in open sessions with the Company’s management,ratification because we value our stockholders’ views on our independent registered public accounting firm and internal auditors.as a matter of good corporate practice. In addition,the event that our stockholders fail to ratify the selection, it will be considered a recommendation to the Audit Committee meets regularlyto consider the selection of a different firm. Even if the selection is ratified, the Audit Committee may in closed executive sessions with the Company’s management,its discretion select a different independent registered public accounting firm at any time during the year if it determines that such a change would be in the best interests of the Company and our stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the ratification of the appointment of

Deloitte & Touche LLP as our independent registered public accounting firm.

Audit and Non-Audit Fees

The following table sets forth fees paid to our auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, in 2023 and 2022 for audit and non-audit services. All of the services described below were approved in accordance with our pre-approval policy, which is described in the next section.

  

 

  2023     2022 

Audit fees(A)

   $8,135,000     $8,091,000 

Audit-related fees

         75,000 

Tax fees(B)

   2,832,000      728,000 

All other fees

   3,000      158,000 

Total

  $10,970,000     $9,052,000 

(A)

Audit fees include fees associated with MGM Growth Properties LLC (“MGP”) of $205,000 in 2022.

(B)

Tax fees include fees associated with MGP of $10,000 in 2022.

The category “Audit fees” includes fees for our annual audit and quarterly reviews of our consolidated financial statements and of our subsidiaries, the attestation reports on our internal auditors,control over financial reporting, statutory and reports its findingscompliance audits required by gaming regulators, assistance with SEC filings, and fees related to debt and equity offerings. The category “Audit-related fees” includes fees related to other assurance services not included in “Audit Fees.” The category “Tax fees” includes fees related to tax consultation, tax planning and tax compliance services. The category “All other fees” includes consulting services for the purpose of providing advice and recommendations.

Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures

Our Audit Committee has a policy related to pre-approval of all audit and permissible non-audit services to be provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all services provided by the independent registered public accounting firm. Pre-approvals for classes of services are granted at the start of each fiscal year and are applicable for such year. As provided under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the SEC’s rules, the Audit Committee has delegated pre-approval authority to the Board of Directors.

The Board of Directors has determined that Mr. Hernandez, Mr. Bible, Ms. Herman and Ms. McKinney-James meet the current independence and experience requirements of the NYSE’s listing standards. The Board of Directors has determined that each of the memberschair of the Audit Committee is “financially literate” and that Messrs. Hernandez and Bible each qualify as an “audit committee financial expert,” as definedto address certain requests for pre-approval in the NYSE’s listing standards and the SEC’s regulations. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that the service of Mr. Hernandez on other audit committees, as described earlier in the description of his principal occupation and other directorships under “Election of Directors,” would not impair his ability to effectively serve on the Company’s Audit Committee. The Board of Directors will review such determination at its meeting following the Annual Meeting, when it makes committee assignments for the coming year.
Compensation Committee
The Compensation Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter is posted on the Company’s website atwww.mgmresorts.com/compensationcommitteeunder the caption “Compensation Committee Charter,” and a copy will be made available, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it in writing to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications. The primary function of the Compensation Committee is to ensure that the compensation program for executives of the Company (i) is effective in attracting and retaining key officers, (ii) links pay to business strategy and performance, and (iii) is administered in a fair and equitable fashion in the stockholders’ interests. Among other things, the Compensation Committee recommends the executive compensation policy to the Board, determines compensation of executive officers of the Company, determines the performance criteria and bonuses to be granted pursuant to the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers and administers and approves the granting of share-based awards under the Company’s Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee’s authority and oversight extends to total compensation, including base salaries, bonuses, share-based awards, and other forms of compensation. See “Executive and Director Compensation and Other Information — Compensation Discussion and Analysis” below.
The Compensation Committee also prepares the annual Compensation Committee report appearing in the Company’s Proxy Statement. In addition, the Compensation Committee reviews and discusses with management the proposed Compensation Discussion and Analysis disclosure and determines whether to recommend it to the Board for inclusion in the Company’s Proxy Statement.
The Compensation Committee has considered and evaluated risks associated with our compensation programs, including the implementation and management thereof. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has


19


discussed risk management practices with the entire Board of Directors, as well as the Audit Committee and certain of the Company’s executive officers.
Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the Board of Directors. The charter is posted on the Company’s website atwww.mgmresorts.com/nominatingcommitteeunder the caption “Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee Charter,” and a copy will be made available, free of charge, to any stockholder who requests it in writing to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee’s responsibilities include the selection of director nominees to be recommended to the Board of Directors and the development and review of the Corporate Governance Guidelines. Among other things, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee also (i) develops and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors for specific criteria for selecting directors, (ii) reviews and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to membership on committees of the Board of Directors, other than the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee, (iii) develops, reassesses and makes recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to succession plans of the Chief Executive Officer and the Company’s other key executive officers, (iv) oversees the annual self-evaluations of the Board of Directors, and (v) oversees the orientation program for new directors and continuing education for directors.
In determining the criteria for Board membership, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee considers the appropriate skills and personal characteristics required in light of the then-current makeup of the Board and in the context of the perceived needs of the Company at the time, including, among other things, the following experience and personal attributes: leadership abilities; financial acumen; general and special business experience and expertise; industry knowledge; high ethical standards; independence; sound judgment; interpersonal skills; and overall effectiveness.
The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may receive recommendations for Board candidates from various sources, including the Company’s stockholders. In addition, the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee may engage an independent executive search firm to assist in identifying qualified candidates. The Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee will review all recommended candidates in the same manner regardless of the source of the recommendation. Recommendations from stockholders should be in writing and addressed to: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications, and must include the proposed candidate’s name, address, age and qualifications together with the information required under federal securities laws and regulations. Such communication must be received in a timely manner and in accordance with the Company’s Amended and Restated Bylaws, and must include the recommending stockholder’s name, address, number of shares of Common Stock beneficially owned, and the length of time such shares have been held. See “Notice Concerning Stockholder Proposals and Nominations” below.
Stockholder and Interested Parties Communications with Directors
The Board of Directors has established a process for stockholders and other interested parties to communicate with members of the Board, the non-management directors as a group and the Lead Independent Director. All such communications should be in writing and should be addressed to the Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications. All inquiries are reviewed by the Corporate Secretary, who forwards to the Board, the non-management directors or the Lead Independent Director, as applicable, a summary of all such correspondence and copies of all communications that he determines are appropriate and consistent with the Company’s operations and policies. Matters relevant to other departments of the Company are directed to such departments with appropriatefollow-up to ensure that appropriate inquiries are responded to in a timely manner. Matters relating to accounting, auditingand/or internal controls are referred to the Chairbetween regularly scheduled meetings of the Audit Committee, and included in the reportsuch pre-approval decisions are reported to the Board, together with a report of any action taken to address the matter. The Board of Directors or the Audit Committee as the case may be, may direct such further action deemed necessary or appropriate.


20


Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
Messrs. Mandekic and Taylor are members of our Compensation Committee and employees of Tracinda, and certain transactions between the Company and Tracinda are further discussed below.
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PERSONS
Description of Transactions
James J. Murren was a co-founder of, and currently serves as a director of, the Nevada Cancer Institute, a non-profit organization. Mr. Murren’s wife, Heather Hay Murren, was also a co-founder and served as the first Chairman of the Board of the Nevada Cancer Institute fromat its founding until June 2009. Mrs. Murren currently serves as a director of the Nevada Cancer Institute, along with Corey I. Sanders, our Chief Operating Officer, and William M. Scott IV, our Executive Vice President — Corporate Strategy and Special Counsel. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company made contributions of cash, goods and servicesnext regular meeting. The policy is designed to the Nevada Cancer Institute in the amount of $52,000, and the Nevada Cancer Institute purchased goods and services from the Company and its subsidiaries in the amount of $92,000. In addition, CityCenter, a joint venture between the Company and Infinity World Development Corp., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Dubai World, made contributions of goods and services to the Nevada Cancer Institute in the amount of $74,000, and the Nevada Cancer Institute purchased goods and services from CityCenter in the amount of $297,000.
Rose McKinney-James and Alan Feldman, our Senior Vice President — Public Affairs, serve as directors of the Smith Center for Performing Arts in Las Vegas, Nevada. In 2007, the Company pledged a $1,000,000 contribution to the Smith Center for Performing Arts, of which $380,000 had been paid as of December 31, 2010 and $620,000help ensure that there is scheduled to be paid over the next four years. The Company made payments to the Smith Center for Performing Arts totaling $25,000 in 2010 under the multi-year pledge.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, Kirk Kerkorian, the sole stockholder of Tracinda, and Tracinda collectively paid the Company the aggregate amount of $127,000 for hotel and other related services provided by the Company.
For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company incurred expenses in connection with the Company’s use of Tracinda’s aircraft for a total amount of $193,000 pursuant to a Lease Agreement. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2010, Tracinda paid the Company a total amount of $5,000 as reimbursement of permitted expenses pursuant to a Time Sharing Agreement in connection with Tracinda’s use of the Company’s aircraft.
In connection with Tracinda’s participation in the Company’s October 2010 underwritten public offering, Tracinda is required to reimburse the Company for its portion of the costs related to the equity issuance. As of April 2011, Tracinda has reimbursed the Company approximately $121,000 of such costs. The Company will bill additional costs to Tracinda in the event that additional reimbursable payments are made.
In connection with the sales of residential condominium units at CityCenter, certain of our directors, executive officers and our principal stockholderand/or their immediate family members have entered into purchase agreements and have paid deposits. The prices paid pursuant to these purchase agreements were consistent with prices charged to unrelated third parties. For the year ended December 31, 2010, CityCenter received payments related to the residential condominium units from Tracinda in the amount of $645,989 and from James J. Murren in the amount of $1,393,838. In addition, in 2010, John M. McManus, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary, and a third party entered into an agreement with CityCenter to terminate the purchase of one such condominium with a total sales price of $2,494,000, entitling them to receive $124,700 of their deposit (50% of which was attributed to Mr. McManus) and forfeiting $374,100 of their deposit (50% of which was attributed to Mr. McManus); Alan Feldman, our Senior Vice President — Public Affairs, entered into an agreement with CityCenter to terminate the purchase of one such condominium with a total sales price of $796,000, entitling him to receive $39,800 of his deposit and forfeiting $119,400 of his deposit; and Rose McKinney-James entered into an agreement with CityCenter to terminate the purchase of one such condominium with a total sales price of $689,000, entitling her to receive $34,450 of her deposit and forfeiting $103,350 of her deposit.


21


Mandalay Resort Group, a subsidiary of the Company, entered into a time sharing agreement with James J. Murren in connection with his personal use of the Company’s aircraft. Under the time sharing agreement, Mr. Murren may lease the Company’s aircraft, including crew and flight services. See “Executive Compensation” for amounts reimbursed by Mr. Murren and for unreimbursed amounts that are considered perquisites.
Deborah Arpin, Vice President & CFO of a subsidiary of the Company, is a family member of Rick Arpin, an executive officer of the Company. For the year ended December 31, 2010, she earned total compensation of $401,980, which includes base salary, bonus, and the value of stock-based awards.
Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions
Our Board has approved separate written guidelines under the Company’s Code of Conduct for the reporting, review and approval of potential conflicts of interest (the “Conflict of Interest Guidelines”). Each potential conflict of interest that is reportable under the Conflict of Interest Guidelines is reviewed internally on acase-by-case basis. Any such reportable potential conflict of interest involving a director or executive officer, any of their respective spouses, minor children or other dependents, must be reviewedno delegation by the Audit Committee of authority or a designated member thereof. Furthermore, all such reportable potential conflicts of interest involving other employees, or their respective spouses, minor children or other dependents, are reviewed by the Company’s internal legal department.
Because the Conflict of Interest Guidelines were designedresponsibility for pre-approval decisions to implement a procedure by which the Company can review and take action with respect to potential conflicts of interest, the criteria for determining which proposed transactions are reportable under the Conflict of Interest Guidelines are based on various factors designed to determine the materiality of such transaction with respect to the corresponding employee or director, including the size of the transaction or investment, the nature of the investment or transaction, the nature of the relationship between the third party and the Company, the nature of the relationship between the third party and the director or employee, and the net worth of the employee or director, and are not based on the threshold set forth in Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K. Furthermore, the Conflict of Interest Guidelines are not applicable to any stockholder of the Company who is not otherwise an employee or a director of the Company. Therefore, while certain transactions that are reportable under Item 404(a) ofRegulation S-K might be reportable under the Conflict of Interest Guidelines, none of the transactions reported under the “Description of Transactions”sub-section above was reported or reviewed pursuant to the Conflict of Interest Guidelines.management.

40 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


AUDIT COMMITTEE REPORT

Proposals Requiring Your Vote

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee reviewed and discussed the audited financial statements with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, and management represented to the Audit Committee that the Company’s consolidated financial statements were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. The discussions with Deloitte & Touche LLP included the matters required to be discussed by Statement on Auditing Standards No. 61, as amended (AICPA, Professional Standards, Vol. 1, AU section 380), as adopted by theunder applicable Public Company Accounting Oversight Board in Rule 3200T.(“PCAOB”) standards. The Audit Committee also received the written disclosures and the letter from Deloitte & Touche LLP required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight BoardPCAOB regarding the independent accountant’s communications with the Audit Committee concerning independence and has discussed with Deloitte & Touche LLP theirits independence.

The Audit Committee also: (i) reviewed and discussed with management, the Company’s internal auditors and Deloitte & Touche LLP, the Company’s internal control over its financial reporting process;and (ii) monitored management’s review and analysis of the adequacy and effectiveness of those controls and processes; and (iii) reviewed and discussed with management and Deloitte & Touche LLP their respective assessment of the effectiveness and adequacy of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


22


Based on the Audit Committee’s review of the audited financial statements and the review and discussions described in the foregoing paragraphs, the Audit Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the audited financial statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102023 be included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 20102023 for filing with the SEC.
ROLAND HERNANDEZ,

KEITH MEISTER, Chair

WILLIAM A. BIBLE
ALEXIS M. HERMAN
ROSE MCKINNEY-JAMES

MARY CHRIS JAMMET

PAUL SALEM

DAN TAYLOR

The foregoing report of the Audit Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such report by reference therein.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

41


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

PROPOSAL NO. 3 ADVISORY VOTE TO APPROVE EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and narrative disclosure (also referred to as “say-on-pay”).

Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement, which begins on page 47, for a more detailed discussion of how our compensation programs reflect our overarching compensation philosophy and core business principles. We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our named executive officer compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This vote is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our named executive officers. Accordingly, we ask our stockholders to vote “FOR” the advisory vote for adoption of the following resolution:

“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of MGM Resorts International approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in our Proxy Statement in accordance with Item 402 of Regulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and narrative disclosure.”

Although the advisory vote is not binding on the Human Capital and Compensation Committee or the Board, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and the Board will review the results of the vote and consider them in future determinations concerning our executive compensation program. The Board has adopted a policy of holding say-on-pay votes annually. Accordingly, unless the Board determines otherwise, the next advisory vote to approve executive compensation will occur at the 2025 annual meeting of stockholders.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the advisory vote to approve executive compensation.

42 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

PROPOSAL NO. 4 APPROVAL AND ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT TO THE COMPANY’S CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION

The Board has unanimously adopted, and recommends that our stockholders approve, an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (as amended the “Certificate of Incorporation”), to reflect new Delaware law provisions regarding exculpation of officers as permitted by the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”, and such amendment, the “Proposed Amendment”). Article E.10 of the Certificate of Incorporation currently limits the personal liability of directors for monetary damages for breaches of their fiduciary duty of care pursuant to, and consistent with Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL. Effective August 1, 2022, the State of Delaware amended Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL to permit Delaware corporations to exculpate officers for personal liability for breaches of their fiduciary duty of care in certain circumstances. The amendment allows Delaware corporations to provide such officers with certain protections traditionally available only to directors. For both directors and officers, the liability limitation does not apply to breaches of the duty of loyalty, acts or omissions not in good faith or acts or omissions that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, or any transaction in which the director or officer derived an improper personal benefit. The new Delaware legislation only permits, and the Proposed Amendment would only permit, exculpation for direct claims made by stockholders and would not apply to claims brought by the Company or derivative claims made by stockholders on behalf of the Company. A Delaware corporation must affirmatively amend its certificate of incorporation to extend exculpation to officers as the protections do not apply automatically.

Adopting an officer exculpation provision that aligns with the protections afforded under the DGCL could prevent protracted or otherwise meritless litigation that distracts from our primary objective of creating stockholder value over the long term. The Board believes that providing protection from certain liabilities for our officers is important in order to limit the concern of officers for personal risk and allow them to exercise their best business judgment in response to time-sensitive challenges which carry risk of investigations, claims, actions, suits or proceedings seeking to impose liability on the basis of hindsight, regardless of merit. The Proposed Amendment enables our officers to make crucial decisions to further stockholder interests while minimizing distraction posed by lawsuits and costs which may, directly or indirectly, be borne by the Company.

Furthermore, the Board believes the Proposed Amendment will help the Company attract and retain experienced and qualified senior executives, as similar officer exculpation provisions have been, and are likely to be adopted by the Company’s peers and others with whom the Company competes for executive talent. Finally, the Proposed Amendment will generally align the protections available to our officers with those currently available to our directors.

For the reasons stated above, the Board believes the Proposed Amendment is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders.

If the Proposed Amendment is approved by stockholders, Article E.10 of the Certificate of Incorporation would read as follows:

“A director or officer of this Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty by such director or officer as a director or officer, respectively, except for liability (i) for any breach of such director’s or officer’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the DGCL, in the case of directors only, (iv) for any transaction from which such director or officer derived an improper personal benefit, or (v) for any action by or in the right of the Corporation, in the case of officers only. If the DGCL is amended to authorize corporate action further eliminating or limiting the personal liability of directors or officers, then the liability of a director or officer of the Corporation shall be eliminated or limited to the fullest extent permitted by the DGCL, as so amended.

Any repeal or amendment of this Article 10 by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only, and shall not adversely affect any limitation on the personal liability of a director or officer of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.

For purposes of this Article 10, “officer” shall have the meaning provided in Section 102(b)(7) of the DGCL, as amended from time to time.”

Other than the replacement of the existing Article E.10 with the proposed Article E.10, the remainder of our Certificate of Incorporation will remain unchanged. If the Proposed Amendment is approved by our stockholders, it will become effective immediately upon the filing of a Certificate of Amendment to the Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware, which the Company expects to do promptly after the Annual Meeting. If the Proposed Amendment is not approved by our stockholders, the Certificate of Incorporation will remain unchanged.

The Board recommends a vote “FOR” the approval and adoption of the amendment to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to limit the liability of certain officers and the amendment and restatement of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation to reflect such amendment.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

43


COMPENSATION COMMITTEE

Proposals Requiring Your Vote

PROPOSAL NO. 5 SHAREHOLDER PROPOSAL – REPORT TO SHAREHOLDERS ON RISKS CREATED BY THE COMPANY’S DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION EFFORTS

The National Center for Public Policy Research has informed the Company that it intends to present the proposal set forth below for consideration at the Annual Meeting.

Report to Shareholders on Risks Created by the Company’s Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Efforts

WHEREAS:

The US Supreme Court ruled in SFFA v. Harvard on June 29, 2023, that discriminating on the basis of race in college admissions violates the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment.1

Attorneys General of 13 States warned Fortune 100 companies on July 13, 2023, that SFFA implicated corporate diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.2

Prior legal advice regarding the legality of racially discriminatory programs has been called into question post-SFFA.3

Recent analysis of American Fortune 100 hiring in the wake of the 2020 race riots found that whites were excluded from 94% of the hiring decisions,4 a statistic that itself provides prima facie proof of illegal discrimination on the basis of race by these companies, given that whites constitute 76% of the American population.5

A review of MGM’s 2022 Social Impact and Sustainability Report reveals that MGM is potentially discriminating in illegal ways as follows: (1) adopting a goal of “15% procurement from Diverse Suppliers by 2025,” (2) allocating $300 million to diverse suppliers in 2022, and (3) allocating resources in potentially discriminatory ways via its Supplier Diversity Mentorship Program with a goal of graduating 150 diverse owned businesses by 2025.6 In addition, MGM has been rated “medium risk” by the 1792 Exchange on its “Spotlight Bias Report,” which notes among other things that MGM “vets vendors according to LGBTQ policies,”7 which could lead to MGM illegally discriminating against vendors on the basis of a vendor’s religious beliefs.

RESOLVED:

Shareholders ask that the board commission and publish a report on (1) whether the Company engages in any practices directly or indirectly associated with diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives that may create risks of discriminating illegally on bases such as race and sex, thereby potentially triggering justice-seeking responses from stakeholders of the company (including employees, suppliers, contractors, and retained professionals), and (2) the potential costs of such discrimination to the business.

SUPPORTING STATEMENT:

In just the past year, a corporation was successfully sued for a single case of discrimination against a white employee resulting in an award of more than $25 million.8 The risk of being sued for such discrimination appears only to be rising.9

1

https://www.scotusblog.com/case-files/cases/students-for-fair-admissions-inc-v-president-fellows-of-harvard-college/

2

https://ag.ks.gov/docs/default-source/documents/corporate-racial-discrimination-multistate-letter.pdf?sfvrsn=968abc1a_2

3

https://freebeacon.com/democrats/starbucks-hired-eric-holder-to-conduct-a-civil-rights-audit-the-policies-he-blessed-got-the-coffee-maker-sued/

4

https://www.bloomberg.com/graphics/2023-black-lives-matter-equal-opportunity-corporate-diversity/ https://www.dailywire.com/news/bloomberg-flubs-data-for-bombshell-report-that-only-6-of-new-corporate-hires-are-white

5

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222

6

https://www.mgmresorts.com/content/dam/MGM/corporate/csr/annual-report/mgm-resorts-social-impact-and- sustainability-annual-report-2022.pdf

7

https://1792exchange.com/company/mgm-resorts-international/

8

https://www.foxbusiness.com/features/starbucks-manager-shannon-phillips-wins-25-million-lawsuit-fired-white-donte-robinson-rashon-nelson

9

See, e.g., https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-class-action-lawsuit-against-progressive-insurance-for-illegal-racial-discrimination/;
https://aflegal.org/afl-files-federal-civil-rights-complaint-against-activision-for-illegal-racist-
sexist-and-discriminatory-hiring-practices-and-sends-letter-to-activision-board-demanding-they-end-unlawful-dei-polici/;
https://aflegal.org/america-first-legal-files-federal-civil-rights-complaint-against-kelloggs-warns-management-that-its-violating-fiduciary-duties/

44 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

With over 80,000 employees,10 MGM likely has at least 60,000 employees who are potentially the victims of this type of illegal discrimination because they are white, Asian, male, or straight.11 Accordingly, even if only 10 percent of such employees were to file suit, and only 10 percent of those prove successful, the cost to the company could exceed $15 billion. And while racial equity audits can cost up to $4 million, this report should cost much less, as it need review only the potentially discriminatory programs, unless MGM has established so many such programs that its liability for this discrimination must be expected to be much higher.

MGM’s Board of Directors’ statement OPPOSING this shareholder proposal.

The Board has carefully considered the terms of this shareholder proposal and has determined that preparing the requested report would be duplicative and unnecessary and is therefore not in the best interests of our shareholders. The Board oversees, and is committed to, the Company’s strategy, framework and policies for diversity, equity and inclusion that are legally compliant and non-discriminatory.

Why We Recommend Your Vote Against this Proposal

We are committed to an inclusive and diverse culture for all of our stakeholders and have embedded this commitment into our policies and procedures.

We have existing Board oversight and risk management processes.

Management regularly reviews our policies and practices for compliance with applicable laws, including for our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives.

Preparing the report requested by the proponent would be duplicative and unnecessary.

We are Committed to an Inclusive and Diverse Culture for all of our Stakeholders and have Embedded this Commitment into our Policies and Procedures.

At MGM Resorts, the principles and practices of inclusion are embedded into all aspects of our culture, guest services and operations, and we strive to promote an environment that seeks diverse ideas and perspectives that lead to innovative and creative solutions. We take seriously our commitment to diversity and respect for people from all backgrounds, including sex, gender identity or expression, race, national origin, religion, ancestry, age, sexual orientation, veteran status, disability, and other dimensions of diversity. These principles are reflected in a number of our policies, including: our Code of Conduct; Supplier Code of Conduct; Policy Against Discrimination, Harassment, and Retaliation; Global Human Rights Policy; and our Equal Employment Opportunity Policy.

Our Code of Conduct and Supplier Code of Conduct make it clear that we are committed to dealing fairly with suppliers and selecting suppliers via a transparent, open, fair and thorough process. We believe that maintaining healthy, strategic relationships with suppliers allows us to leverage the assets, capabilities and knowledge of suppliers, which is essential to the good health and long-term sustainable growth of our business. In addition, gaming regulators in certain of the jurisdictions where we operate require us to comply with supplier diversity requirements. Further, we believe that by embedding diversity and inclusion into our business strategies, we are also more directly able to attract members of diverse communities to our resorts and entertainment offerings. And, by seeking to buy from, and offer mentorship to, diverse suppliers, we not only endeavor to ensure a more resilient supply chain, but we also support the economic development of the very communities in which we operate. Our supplier initiatives aim to strengthen our operations and provide us access to a diverse range of unique, creative and high-quality products and services in order to allow us to deliver the world-class guest experience for which we are renowned.

Further, at MGM Resorts, our employment decisions are based on individual merit and achievement, qualifications, job performance, training, and experience. Employment opportunities are open to all qualified applicants, and decisions are made without regard to any status or classification protected by law. We aim to develop and enhance transparent talent systems that ensure equal access to employment and career growth opportunities for all.

10

https://www.mgmresorts.com/en/company/.html#/Careers

11

https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/PST045222

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

45


Proposals Requiring Your Vote

We Have Existing Board Oversight and Risk Management Processes.

In addition to the policies, programs, and initiatives that support our commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion, we have enterprise-wide risk management processes to protect against risks to the Company. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board oversees the strategies and policies related to human capital management, including diversity, equity and inclusion, and talent recruitment and development, retention and engagement. The Corporate Social Responsibility & Sustainability Committee monitors the Company’s overall approach to corporate responsibility and sustainability, as well as culture, and oversees the Company’s community relations activities and supplier and customer diversity programs.

Our Chief Executive Officer is actively engaged in strategy development and implementation of Directorsour environmental and social responsibility efforts and serves, together with our Chief People, Inclusion and Sustainability Officer (“CPISO”), as liaisons to the Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability Committee. Our CPISO oversees the social impact & sustainability taskforce, which includes executives from legal, investor relations, risk, finance, purchasing and other functions. The taskforce’s mandate is to keep abreast of developments in the social impact and sustainability landscape and to strengthen the Company’s social Impact & sustainability disclosures. In addition, the CPISO works closely with the legal department to review all Company policies and disclosures in light of applicable legal or regulatory requirements and developments in industry practice. Further, in 2019, the Company engaged in a materiality assessment, the results of which were integrated into our Enterprise Risk Management process. As part of this assessment, climate change, human capital management and diversity and inclusion were deemed to be the highest priority issues to our stakeholders. The Company has just completed a second and double materiality assessment which further identified diversity, equity and inclusion as one of the highest priority double materiality issues.

Management Regularly Reviews our Policies and Practices for Compliance with Applicable Laws.

Management reviews our diversity, equity and inclusion initiatives regularly, to ensure compliance with applicable legal requirements, and in light of changing industry practices. These reviews include initiatives focused on supplier diversity, as well as on diversity, equity and inclusion practices more broadly. As described above, these programs are overseen at the Board-level. As a result, the proponent’s requested review would be duplicative and unnecessary.

The Company’s diversity, equity and inclusion programs have been well-recognized for years, garnering many prestigious awards that serve to enhance our reputation with our customers, vendors, employees and other stakeholders, and bolster our competitive advantage.

In light of our demonstrated commitment to our core values of diversity, equity, and inclusion for all, from customers to vendors to employees, as well as our existing board oversight and risk management process, and because preparing the proponent’s requested report would be duplicative and unnecessary, the Board recommends that shareholders vote against this proposal.

The Board recommends a vote for “AGAINST” this Proposal.

46 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis reports on compensation policies applicable to our named executive officers, as determined pursuant to applicable SEC rules.

In 2023, our named executive officers (sometimes referred to as our “NEOs”) were the following individuals:

NAME

TITLE

William J. Hornbuckle

Chief Executive Officer and President

Jonathan S. Halkyard

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

Corey I. Sanders

Chief Operating Officer

Gary Fritz

President, Interactive*

John M. McManus

Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary

*

Mr. Fritz was promoted to President, Interactive on October 10, 2022, with his new compensation effective as of October 1, 2022, from his prior role as Managing Director, Digital Mergers & Acquisitions.

Results from 2023 Say-on-Pay Vote

The 2023 advisory proposal to approve the 2022 compensation of our NEOs (the “say-on-pay” proposal) was approved by approximately 95.57% of the votes cast. Following the annual meeting in 2023, the chair of our Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee, who is also a member of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and the Audit Committee, together with certain members of management, met with 7 of our institutional stockholders, which totaled approximately 12.4% of our stockholder base as of March 8, 2024, to discuss a wide range of topics, including executive compensation and corporate governance practices. In addition to the stockholders described in the preceding sentence, two of our largest stockholders, holding approximately 22% of our shares as of March 8, 2024, are represented on the Board and have the opportunity to engage in, discussions regarding corporate governance matters, including executive compensation. Based on the positive results of the 2023 say-on-pay vote, and considering feedback from these discussions, we believe that our stockholders are generally satisfied with our current executive compensation program and policies. We therefore did not make any significant changes to our compensation program and policies as a result of the 2023 say-on-pay vote.

LOGO

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Last year was a year of many significant achievements by the Company, as described in more detail below (see “Elements of Compensation—Annual Incentive Bonus”). The Company believes that the following executive compensation design elements and practices have contributed to this success.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

47


Executive Compensation

Continued Focus on Performance-Based Compensation and Long-Term Incentives

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee continues to believe that equity incentives should be the most significant part of an NEO’s compensation package. This belief is further reflected in the NEO’s employment agreements, which provides that each NEO will receive any amounts earned in excess of 150% of their target annual bonus in deferred restricted stock units (“Bonus dRSUs”).

The charts below illustrate the importance of long-term incentives for the NEOs, which comprise approximately 63% of the CEO’s target direct compensation and 54% of the target direct compensation of the other NEOs. The majority of our long-term incentives (“LTIs”) are performance based, with payouts determined based on (1) the achievement of an absolute total stockholder return (“TSR”) target with respect to the Company’s stock and (2) TSR as compared to the other companies included in the S&P 500. The balance of our NEOs’ LTI awards are provided in the form of restricted stock units (“RSUs”), where the value ultimately realized by the NEO is directly tied to our stock price on the date the award vests.

LOGO

2023 Compensation Actions at a Glance

Annual Bonus

New Design for 2023:  In 2021 and 2022 the Company continued to see an impact from the COVID-19 pandemic on its U.S. operations and, as a result, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee took a different approach to structuring the annual bonus programs for those years. In 2023, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee decided to revisit the structure in light of the expectation that the pandemic would no longer have a significant impact on the Company’s U.S. operations and determined to increase the weighting of the financial goal and apply the goal to the full 2023 fiscal year. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee continued to believe that EBITDAR is an important component of the Company’s annual incentive bonus and, as a result, has established a full year EBITDAR goal similar to the Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target as defined for 2022 (the “2023 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target”), weighted 70% for Messrs. Hornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders and McManus and 50% for Mr. Fritz. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believed that COVID-19 might continue to create uncertainty in the MGM China operating results and, as a result, determined to exclude EBITDAR related to MGM China operations from the financial goal for 2023, in addition to certain other exclusions and adjustments. The 2023 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee was consistent with the EBITDAR as set by management and approved by the Board in the budgeting process for 2023. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee decided to return to the pre-COVID-19 payout range when determining achievement of the 2023 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target such that the threshold for achievement was 80% of the target level and maximum achievement was 115%. Participants were able to achieve 200% of their target bonus for maximum achievement of this goal. The remaining 30% for participants other than Mr. Fritz was determined based on achievement of the following strategic and operational goals: (1) execution of strategic plan in consultation with the Board and efforts undertaken to achieve a baseline corporate expense of $850 million or less, weighted 20%, and (2) execution of Social Impact and Sustainability Strategy focused on volunteerism and community engagement, fostering diversity and inclusion and water reduction, weighted 10%. The remaining 50% for Mr. Fritz was determined based on achievement of three strategic goals, as further described below, related to the Company’s global digital strategy. All participants were able to achieve 200% of their target bonus for maximum achievement of these goals, resulting in the potential for participants to receive 200% of their target bonuses for 2023.

48 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

Long-Term Incentives

For 2023, as in prior years, LTIs were granted to our executives in the form of performance share units (“PSUs”) and RSUs.

LTIs generally consist of three components:

Relative TSR PSUs (30% of LTI grant value)—The payment, if any, of these awards is determined by comparing MGM’s TSR to the TSR of other companies in the S&P 500 as of the end of the three-year performance measurement period.

Absolute TSR PSUs (30% of LTI grant value)—The payment, if any, of these awards is determined based on MGM’s TSR as of the end of the three-year performance measurement period. These Absolute TSR PSUs vest at the target level at the end of the applicable three-year performance period only if our TSR equals 25%.

RSUs (40% of LTI grant value)—The payment of these awards is based on continued service, with RSUs vesting in four equal annual installments.

See “Elements of Compensation” below for a further description of annual base salary, the 2023 Bonus Program and Long-Term Equity Incentives.

Executive Compensation “Best Practices”

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee conducts an ongoing review of its existing compensation programs and currently intends to retain several policies that it believes continue to represent best practices, based on advice from F.W. Cook:

Executive officer stock ownership guidelines.  We recognize the importance of aligning our management’s interests with those of our stockholders. As a result, the Board, at the recommendation of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, established stock ownership guidelines for all of our executive officers, including our NEOs.

Under these guidelines, our NEOs are expected to accumulate Company stock having a fair market value equal to a multiple of their applicable base salaries as shown in the table below.

POSITION

MULTIPLE OF

BASE SALARY

CEO

6X

Other Executive Officers (including NEOs other than CEO)

3X

For purposes of these guidelines, shares held in trust or retirement accounts and RSUs (including deferred RSUs)—but not PSUs or stock appreciation rights (“SARs”)—count toward the ownership guidelines. Each executive officer is required to retain 50% of the net after-tax shares received upon vesting/exercise of equity incentive awards until the guidelines are satisfied. The Board also adopted stock ownership guidelines for directors, which are described in “Corporate Governance—Director Stock Ownership Guidelines.” As of December 31, 2023, all NEOs were in compliance.

No single trigger arrangements.  No executive officer is entitled to single trigger change of control benefits. Our change of control policy conditions change-of-control-benefits (including equity award benefits) on termination without cause or a termination by the executive with “good reason” following a change of control (“double trigger”).

Uniform change of control policy.  We maintain a generally uniform policy with regard to severance payable to NEOs and other executive officers in connection with a change of control. See “Executive Compensation—Uniform Change of Control Policies.”

Discretionary reduction of annual bonus.  The Human Capital and Compensation Committee retains the right to reduce or eliminate any award under our annual bonus program (as in effect from time to time) in its sole and absolute discretion if it determines that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate with respect to the applicable performance criteria or any other applicable factors.

No golden parachute tax gross ups.  In the event that there is a change of control that triggers golden parachute excise taxes under Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, we are not obligated to provide any so-called “golden parachute” excise tax gross-up protection to any of our executive officers.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

49


Executive Compensation

Prohibition on short sales, derivatives trading and pledging and hedging of Company securities.  Our insider trading policy provides that employees (including our NEOs and other executive officers) and our directors may not enter into short sales of our securities or buy or sell exchange traded options on our securities. Further, our insider trading policy prohibits pledging or hedging of our securities by NEOs, Section 16 officers and directors.

Furthermore, in fiscal year 2023, in line with newly-adopted listing standards by the NYSE, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee reviewed and updated our Clawback Policy to require the Company to seek recovery of incentive-based compensation in the event of a financial restatement or other material noncompliance with financial reporting requirements under the securities laws.

COMPENSATION PRACTICES AT A GLANCE

What We DoWhat We Do NOT Do
DO pay for performance – a significant portion of our NEO compensation is at-risk variable compensationûNO pledging permitted by directors or Section 16 officers
DO provide minimum vesting conditions for awards made as part of our long-term equity incentive programûNO hedging or derivative transactions permitted by directors or Section 16 officers
DO conduct annual compensation risk assessmentsûNO “single trigger” change in control payments
DO maintain robust stock ownership guidelinesûNO golden parachute tax gross ups
DO use an independent compensation consultantûNO re-pricing of underwater stock options without stockholder approval
DO incorporate Social Impact and Sustainability goals into the annual incentive bonus program for executive officersûNO minimum payout of long-term incentive compensation

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION PROCESS

Roles in Establishing NEO Compensation

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, implementing, and reviewing the compensation program for our executive officers, including our NEOs. In doing so, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee obtains recommendations from management with respect to the elements of NEO compensation and performance results. Legal and regulatory guidance and market and industry data that may be relevant in determining compensation are provided by management and/or the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s independent outside advisors (as further described below – see “Outside Consultants”). In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee consults with our CEO regarding our performance goals, and our CEO periodically meets with the Chair of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee to discuss his performance and that of other executive officers.

Role of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee, among other things, determines compensation of our executive officers, the incentive awards to be granted to our executive officers and associated performance criteria pursuant to our annual incentive programs and administers and approves the granting of equity-based awards under our 2022 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Equity Plan”). The Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s authority and oversight with respect to the NEOs extends to total compensation, including base salaries, bonuses, non-equity incentive awards, equity-based awards, and other forms of compensation. Pursuant to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee Charter, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has delegated authority to the Chief Financial Officer, with oversight by the Company’s executive committee, the ability to grant up to $1,000,000 annually in equity awards to new hires other than executive officers (which amount the Human Capital and Compensation Committee can increase from time to time in its sole discretion), which may consist of SARs, RSUs, Absolute TSR PSUs and Relative TSR PSUs, and to approve employment contracts for other members of senior management involving base salaries that are less than $500,000. In

50 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has delegated a $3,000,000 annual basket of equity that may be awarded by the CEO as a tool to promote retention; recognize employee contributions, strong performance, or high potential talent; and promote recruitment efforts. Details of awards granted under each of the annual baskets are regularly provided to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee.

Role of Executive Officers

Our NEOs generally do not participate in determining the amount or type of compensation they are paid other than (i) in connection with negotiating their respective employment agreements; (ii) with respect to participation by our CEO in connection with determining the performance criteria for the annual bonus program(s) and the satisfaction of such criteria; and (iii) with respect to participation by the CEO in providing recommendations to our Human Capital and Compensation Committee regarding annual equity awards. Instead, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s assessment of the individual performance of our NEOs is based primarily on the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s independent observation and judgment of the responsibilities, duties, performance, and leadership skills of our NEOs as well as the Company’s overall performance.

Outside Consultants

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee periodically engages outside consultants on various compensation-related or executive assessment and evaluation matters. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has the authority to engage the services of independent legal counsel and consultants to assist them in analyzing and reviewing compensation policies, elements of compensation, and the aggregate compensation to NEOs.

In 2023, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee continued to retain the services of, and received advice from, F.W. Cook, its independent compensation consultant, with respect to executive compensation related matters. F.W. Cook exclusively provides services to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and does not provide any services to the Company other than on behalf of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee has reviewed an assessment of any potential conflicts of interest raised by F.W. Cook’s work for the Human Capital and Compensation Committee and the independence of F.W. Cook and its consultants from management of the Company. The assessment included the following six factors, among others: (i) the provision of other services to the Company by F.W. Cook; (ii) the amount of fees received from the Company by F.W. Cook, as a percentage of F.W. Cook’s total revenue; (iii) the policies and procedures of F.W. Cook that are designed to prevent conflicts of interest; (iv) any business or personal relationship of the F.W. Cook consultant with a member of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee; (v) any Company stock owned by the F.W. Cook consultants; and (vi) any business or personal relationship of the F.W. Cook consultant or F.W. Cook with any of the Company’s executive officers. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee concluded that there are no such conflicts of interest that would prevent F.W. Cook from serving as an independent consultant to the Human Capital and Compensation Committee.

Assessing Compensation Competitiveness

In order to assess whether the compensation awarded to our NEOs is fair and reasonable, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee periodically gathers and reviews data regarding the compensation practices and policies of other public companies of comparable size in the gaming, hospitality, and restaurant industries. The peer group compensation data is reviewed by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee to determine whether the compensation opportunity provided to our NEOs is generally competitive with that provided to the executive officers of our peer group companies, and the Human Capital and Compensation Committee makes adjustments to compensation levels where appropriate based on this information. The peer group is used as a reference point by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee in its compensation decisions with respect to NEOs, but the Human Capital and Compensation Committee does not generally benchmark NEO compensation to any specific level with respect to peer group data.

The relevant information for members of the peer group is gathered from proxy statement data, which may only reflect the compensation paid by these companies in years prior to their disclosure, and other SEC filings. When reviewing the compensation of the executive officers of the peer group, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee compares the market overlap, results of operations, and market capitalization of the peer group with ours. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee also reviews the total compensation, as well as the amount and type of each element of such compensation, of the executive officers of the peer group with duties and responsibilities comparable to those of our NEOs.

The current peer group was selected in February 2023 by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee (the “Peer Group”) and is comprised of gaming, hospitality, and restaurant companies that we consider competitors with us for

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

51


Executive Compensation

business and/or executive management talent. The general selection criteria are to (1) include gaming industry peers with trailing four-quarter revenue greater than $4.0 billion and (2) include companies in the hotels, restaurants and leisure industries with trailing four-quarter revenues and enterprise value in a .33x to 3.0x range of the Company, subject to a potential modest exception for companies selected as peers in prior years. For 2023, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined not to make any changes to the prior year peer group. As set forth in the following table, we are near the 30th percentile as compared to the Peer Group with respect to 12-month average market cap, the 71st percentile with respect to revenue, the 48th percentile on number of employees and the 45th percentile with respect to 12-month average enterprise value as of December 31, 2023. This data is generally based on SEC filings reflecting results through December 31, 2023* (employee data is from the most recent annual report).

Trailing 4Qs

Revenues ($ Millions)

    

Employees

(as of last 10-K filing)

    

12-Month Average ($ Millions) as of

12/31/23

     

Company Size as of 12/31/23

($ Millions)

 
     Enterprise Value    Market Cap Value     Enterprise Value    Market Cap Value 
Starbucks $36,687   Starbucks  381,000   McDonald’s $249,750   McDonald’s $203,495    McDonald’s $261,399   McDonald’s $215,071 
McDonald’s $25,494   Hilton  178,000   Starbucks $136,299   Starbucks $115,507    Starbucks $129,829   Starbucks $109,135 
Marriott $23,713   Darden Rest.  168,980   Marriott $67,246   Marriott $56,111    Marriott $78,247   Marriott $66,230 
Carnival $21,593   McDonald’s  150,000   Chipotle $54,960   Chipotle $52,274    Chipotle $65,329   Chipotle $62,765 
MGM $16,164   Marriott  148,000   Las Vegas Sands $50,452   Las Vegas Sands $41,296    Hilton $55,530   Hilton $46,695 
Royal Caribbean $13,900   Chipotle  116,068   YUM! Brands $48,407   Hilton $39,300    Royal Caribbean $53,320   Las Vegas Sands $37,071 
Caesars $11,528   Royal Caribbean  98,200   Hilton $47,945   YUM! Brands $36,489    Carnival $52,677   YUM! Brands $36,625 
Darden Rest. $11,013   Carnival  87,000   Carnival $47,376   Royal Caribbean $22,193    YUM! Brands $48,215   Royal Caribbean $33,180 
Las Vegas Sands $10,372   MGM  76,000   MGM $43,827   Restaurant Brands $21,733    Las Vegas Sands $45,790   Restaurant Brands $24,379 
Hilton $10,235   Caesars  51,000   Royal Caribbean $43,288   Darden Rest. $18,600    MGM $44,261   Carnival $23,201 
Chipotle $9,872   Norwegian Cruise  38,900   Restaurant Brands $36,776   Carnival $16,601    Restaurant Brands $39,222   Darden Rest. $19,768 
Norwegian Cruise $8,083   Las Vegas Sands  38,700   Caesars $35,491   MGM $15,159    Caesars $35,302   MGM $15,262 
YUM! Brands $7,076   YUM! Brands  35,000   Darden Rest. $24,578   Wynn Resorts $11,306    Darden Rest. $26,581   Wynn Resorts $10,214 
Restaurant Brands $7,022   Wynn Resorts  27,000   Wynn Resorts $20,430   Caesars $10,329    Norwegian Cruise $22,338   Caesars $10,113 
Wynn Resorts $6,532   Penn Ntl Gaming  21,875   Norwegian Cruise $20,069   Norwegian Cruise $6,868    Wynn Resorts $19,153   Norwegian Cruise $8,526 
Penn Ntl Gaming $6,363   Restaurant Brands  9,000   Penn Ntl Gaming $14,612   Penn Ntl Gaming $3,977    Penn Ntl Gaming $14,069   Penn Ntl Gaming $3,890 
                        
75th Percentile $21,593     150,000    $54,960    $52,274     $65,329    $62,765 
Median $10,372     87,000    $47,376    $22,193     $48,215    $33,180 
25th Percentile $7,076     35,000    $24,578    $11,306     $26,581    $10,214 
MGM % Rank  71P       48P       45P       30P       42P       28P 

Source: Standard & Poor’s Capital IQ.

OBJECTIVES OF OUR COMPENSATION PROGRAM

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s primary objectives in setting total compensation and the elements of compensation for our NEOs are to:

attract talented and experienced NEOs and retain their services on a long-term basis;

motivate our NEOs to achieve our annual and long-term operating and strategic goals;

align the interests of our NEOs with the interests of the Company and those of our stockholders; and

encourage our NEOs to balance the management of long-term risks and long-term performance with yearly performance.

52 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

ELEMENTS OF COMPENSATION

In structuring our NEO compensation program, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considers how each component motivates performance and promotes retention and sound long-term decision-making. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee also considers the requirements of our strategic plan and the needs of our business.

Our NEO compensation program consists of the following core components, which are designed to achieve the following objectives:

COMPENSATION ELEMENT

OBJECTIVE

Annual base salary

Attract and retain executive officers by fairly compensating them for performing the fundamental requirements of their positions.

Annual incentive bonus

Motivate executive officers to achieve specific annual financial and/or operational, or strategic goals and objectives whose achievements are critical for near- and long-term success.

Long-term incentives

Align executive officers’ long-term interests with those of our stockholders and drive decisions and achieve goals that will help us to remain competitive and thrive in the competitive global gaming industry; reward executive officers for building and sustaining stockholder value; and retain executive officers both through growth in their equity value and the vesting provisions of our stock awards.

Deferred compensation opportunities

Promote retention and provide individual tax planning flexibility by providing opportunities to postpone receipt of compensation until after the end of covered employment.

Severance and change of control benefits; employment agreements

Attract, retain, and provide reasonable security to executive officers; encourage executives to make sound decisions in the interest of our long-term performance, regardless of personal employment risk.

Perquisites

Provide a market-competitive level of perquisites, which in some cases may be provided at little or no cost to us as an owner and operator of full-service resorts.

Annual Base Salary and Employment Agreements

In 2022, we entered into employment agreements with each of our NEOs pursuant to which each of their new annual base salaries were established as described in the table below.

NEO

  

2022 BASE

SALARY(a)

  

2023 BASE

SALARY

   

CHANGE

YE 2022 TO

YE 2023

   

EMPLOYMENT

AGREEMENT

TERM

EXPIRATION

 

Mr. Hornbuckle

  

$

2,000,000

 

 

$

2,000,000

 

  

 

No Change

 

  

 

August 31, 2026

 

Mr. Halkyard

  

 

1,100,000

 

 

 

1,100,000

 

  

 

No Change

 

  

 

February 1, 2026

 

Mr. Sanders

  

 

1,250,000

 

 

 

1,250,000

 

  

 

No Change

 

  

 

August 31, 2025

 

Mr. Fritz

  

 

1,250,000

(b) 

 

 

1,250,000

 

  

 

No Change

 

  

 

September 30, 2026

 

Mr. McManus

  

 

900,000

 

 

 

900,000

 

  

 

No Change

 

  

 

August 31, 2026

 

(a)

From January 1, 2022 through August 31, 2022, Mr. Hornbuckle’s base salary was $1.5 million, Mr. Halkyard’s base salary was $900,000, Mr. Sanders’ base salary was $1.0 million, and Mr. McManus’ base salary was $700,000. Each of their salaries was increased in connection with the entry into new employment agreements, effective September 1, 2022.

(b)

Prior to Mr. Fritz’s promotion to President, Interactive in October of 2022, Mr. Fritz provided non-exclusive services to the Company to assist the Company with its digital strategy while also providing consulting services to IAC. In connection with his promotion, Mr. Fritz terminated his consultancy relationship and entered into a full-time employment agreement with the Company on the terms described herein.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

53


Executive Compensation

Annual Incentive Bonus

Fiscal Year 2023

Prior to 2020, the Company’s annual incentive bonus program was based on achieving a target level of EBITDAR. Typically, the bonus structure is decided in March of each year using the Board approved budget. In 2020 and 2021, the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic made it impossible to meaningfully forecast EBITDAR and resulted in bonus programs based on the achievement of strategic goals. In 2022, when the Human Capital and Compensation Committee met in March to approve the 2022 bonus structure, it was apparent that the Omicron variant was having a material and unanticipated impact on the Company’s first quarter results but the Human Capital and Compensation Committee was committed to returning to a bonus structure that included a meaningful financial metric and determined to structure the bonus letter such that 60% of a participant’s bonus would be based on adjusted “Actual” EBITDAR (“Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR,” as further described below), with 20% attributable to performance in the second quarter and 40% attributable to performance in the second half of the year. In addition, to address concerns about the impact of future COVID-19 variants on the Company’s performance, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined to adjust the payout range to broaden the scale.

For 2023, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that it was time to return to a financial metric for the full year and determined that 70% of each NEO’s bonus (as further discussed below, a lower percentage was chosen for Mr. Fritz in order to incentivize Mr. Fritz to focus on the Company’s digital growth efforts), would be based on Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR (as adjusted to exclude the impact from MGM China, MGM Branding and Development, expense related to the Japan IR development, and income from unconsolidated affiliates (including BetMGM)). The Human Capital and Compensation Committee established the 2023 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target at $3,668,240,801 for the year and at such time provided certain adjustments that were to be taken into account in revising the Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target should certain events designated by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee occur during the year. Pursuant to the terms of the bonus letter, the 2023 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target was reduced by $3,163,874 as a result of the Gold Strike disposition which closed on February 15, 2023. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee considered the target to be rigorous, reflecting meaningful year-over-year growth. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined to exclude the results of MGM China again in 2023 due to continued uncertainties around the impact of COVID-19 related operating restrictions in Macau on the operations of MGM China.

Under the 2023 annual incentive program, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee reserved the right to increase, reduce or eliminate any participant’s award if it determined, in its sole discretion, that such an increase, reduction or elimination was appropriate with respect to the participant’s performance or any other factors material to the goals, purposes, and administration of the program. In establishing the 2023 annual incentive program, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that, if it were to exercise this authority, some of the factors that it intended to consider were any unforeseen, unusual, or extraordinary gains, losses, expenses, revenues, charges, or credits not contemplated at the time of the bonus letter. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee would also consider management’s efforts to (i) assist MGM China in its continued recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic and (ii) support BetMGM’s continued growth in North America. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that its ability to take these factors into account gives it increased ability to structure annual incentives in a way that recognizes individual performance and other factors relevant to measuring the Company’s success during the fiscal year. Any amounts earned in excess of 150% of their target annual bonus are paid in Bonus dRSUs.

In January of 2024, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that it would not increase, reduce, or eliminate any of the participants’ annual incentive awards for fiscal year 2023. Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR as calculated for 2023 for purposes of the 2023 annual incentive program is $3,823,115,687 for the year, which resulted in each NEO receiving approximately 128.75% of their target award for this component of the bonus.

Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR is a non-GAAP financial measure, meaning that it is not calculated and reported in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. For 2023, the following exclusions were approved to Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR to the extent not contemplated in the original calculation of Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR: (i) impairment of goodwill or other intangible assets, (ii) all third-party costs in connection with any significant unbudgeted acquisition, disposition, corporate reorganization (including spin-offs, split offs or similar transactions) or strategic initiatives regardless of whether the transaction was ultimately consummated (for purposes of this clause, an activity will be considered significant if the third-party costs incurred in connection with such activity exceed $2 million), (iii) gains or losses attributable to the consolidation of an entity previously not consolidated, (iv) EBITDAR attributable to any entity acquired by the Company during 2023 to the extent not included in the Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target, (v) gains or losses attributable to changes in tax laws, (vi) gains or losses attributable to changes in accounting principles, (vii) all license, permit or other fees or expenses related to mandated payments or programs incurred in connection with

54 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

(a) obtaining the right to operate a full commercial casino in the State of New York or the State of Ohio or (b) obtaining licenses in any jurisdiction to engage in sports betting or mobile gaming to the extent reviewed and approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee prior to December 31, 2023, (viii) any gains or losses related to significant legal settlements in excess of insured amounts (for purposes of this clause a settlement will be significant if the associated gain or loss in excess of amounts insured exceeds $2 million), (ix) gains/losses associated with changes in ownership or fair value of investments in unconsolidated entities; (x) gains or losses resulting from the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s operations to the extent reviewed and approved by the Finance Committee; and (xi) any other unforeseen, unusual or extraordinary gains, losses, expenses, revenues, charges or credits not contemplated at the time of the determination of Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Targets to the extent approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee. No adjustments were made pursuant to clauses (x) and (xi).

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that the remaining 30% of an NEO’s bonus, other than Mr. Fritz as further described below, would be based on the following strategic goals.

Goal 1 – Execution of Strategic Plan in Consultation with the Board (weighted 20%):This goal encompassed (i) efforts undertaken to deliver on the four strategic pillars and foundation as set forth in the Strategic Framework developed in consultation with the Board and (ii) efforts undertaken to lead and drive a disciplined approach to achieve a baseline corporate expense of $850 million or less.

Goal 2 – Execution of Social Impact & Sustainability Strategy (weighted 10%):This goal reflected the conclusion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee that the Company’s social impact and sustainability initiatives continue to be important to shareholders, and in order to appropriately incentivize management to focus on social impact and sustainability issues, participants should be evaluated on the success of the efforts undertaken towards achievement of the Company’s publicly disclosed 2025 long-term Social Impact and Sustainability Goals with a focus in 2023 on the following three goals:

Volunteerism (sub-weighted 3%). The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that it is important that the Company invest in its communities and contribute to the social and economic progress where it operates. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that this may be particularly important in 2023 as macro-economic trends at the start of the year indicated the potential for a recession and continued inflationary pressures impacting the spending power of the most vulnerable populations. In evaluating this goal, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee will consider year over year incremental growth in volunteer hours, management’s efforts to encourage volunteerism, and any increases in the percentage of employees volunteering over prior years. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee will also take into consideration any extraordinary projects or programs aimed at improving the communities in which the Company operates in evaluating achievement of this goal.

Fostering Diversity & Inclusion (sub-weighted 4%). The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes it is important for the Company to cultivate relationships with community partners and suppliers to support the development of local and diverse businesses. As part of this, the Company is committed to providing a certain percentage of domestic biddable procurement with diverse suppliers and also providing opportunities to suppliers via the Company’s Supplier Diversity Mentorship Program. In evaluating this goal, the Committee will consider the amount of biddable procurement spent with diverse suppliers in excess of the prior year, efforts undertaken to expand the Supplier Diversity Mentorship Program and other programs or policies aimed at growing diversity in our supply chain.

Water Reduction (sub-weighted 3%). The Human Capital and Compensation Committee understands the importance of water as an important resource that needs to be managed and believes that management should be focused on water efficiency and reducing consumptive water uses. In evaluating this goal, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee will evaluate year over year declines in water use per square foot and efforts undertaken to reduce consumptive water use, including the introduction of programs, such as guest and employee education efforts, aimed at encouraging reduced water consumption and investments in water efficient technological improvements.

In January of 2024, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that the NEOs, other than Mr. Fritz, achieved 90% on the goal related to Execution of Strategic Plan in consultation with the Board and 112.5% on the goal related to the Execution of Social Impact and Sustainability Strategy.

With respect to Goal 1, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee based its determination on several factors, including:

Customer Centric.  In 2023, management successfully delivered on its commitment to provide exceptional guest experiences, which was reflected in achieving record high Gold tier member and above NPS scores from our MGM Rewards members. In addition, the Company executed a historic long-term agreement with Marriott

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

55


Executive Compensation

International to create the “MGM Collection with Marriott Bonvoy,” which is expected to unlock significant benefits and experiences for members of MGM Rewards. Furthermore, the Company successfully hired Dan Yang as its new Chief Customer & Innovation Officer.

Gaming Entertainment.  In 2023, Las Vegas hosted the Formula 1 Grand Prix and the Company was able to capitalize on its location and the breadth of our offerings to create a record-setting weekend for hotel revenue. In addition, management made significant progress in preparing to submit the Company’s RFA in New York and publicly unveiled its vision for MGM Empire City. The Company also received the official certification of the area development plan in Osaka and signed the implementation agreement for the proposed integrated resort in Osaka, Japan, which officially closed the certification process.

Global Leadership.  In 2023, management achieved improvements to its Corporate Reputation score. Mr. Hornbuckle was also re-appointed as the Chair of the U.S. Travel and Tourism Advisory Board, where he is responsible for guiding the private sector recommendations to the Commerce Secretary, and other government agencies.

Financial Stewardship.  In 2023, the Company experienced several all-time record results, including all-time full year net revenue and Adjusted Property EBITDAR records for our Las Vegas Strip Resorts and a full year Adjusted Property EBITDAR record for MGM China, despite facing certain headwinds. The Company also successfully closed on the sale of the operations of Gold Strike Tunica and the acquisition of Push Gaming. In addition, the Company continued to strategically deploy capital, repurchasing 14% of the Company’s outstanding shares during the year. While management worked towards reducing its corporate expense in 2023, corporate expense management was unable to meet or exceed this goal, in part due to certain one-time and other unforeseen expenses.

With respect to Goal 2, the Human Capital & Compensation Committee based its determination on several factors, including:

Volunteering.  In 2023, the Company achieved its 2025 goal to surpass 1.12 million cumulative volunteer hours and saw a significant increase to the number of employee volunteers.

Supplier Diversity.  In 2023, the Company achieved its 2025 goal to spend 15% of domestic biddable procurement with diverse suppliers. In addition, the Company remains on track to meet its goal of 150 graduates from its supplier diversity mentorship program, which had its largest class to date in 2023.

Water Reduction.  In 2023, the Company engaged in several initiatives to reduce consumptive water use, including (i) central plant set point and controls optimizations that save both cooling energy and water, (ii) horticulture program improvements, including changing out plants and landscaping at corporate facilities for less water-intensive alternatives, and (iii) continued development and communication of our Water Stewardship Strategy and its five water principles: Measurement, Efficiency, Quality, Culture, and Citizenship. However, the Company did see slight increases to its global water use, driven in part by increased business volumes at MGM Macau and Cotai.

The following tables set forth the percentages of achievement for the different bonus metrics and the bonus amounts payable to the NEOs (other than Mr. Fritz):

     Performance Goals  Actual  Funding

Measure

  Weighting Threshold  Target  Maximum  Results  (% Target)

EBITDAR ($ Mils)

   

 

70

%

  

$

2,932

   

$

3,665

   

$

4,215

   

$

3,823

   

 

128.7

%

Strategic Plan

   

 

20

%

  

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

90.0

%

Social Impact and Sustainability Goal

   

 

10

%

  

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

112.5

%

Total

   

 

100

%

                          

 

119.4

%

56 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

    Current Employment
Agreement
 

2023
TARGET

BONUS

  

2023
ACTUAL

BONUS

  

ACTUAL
BONUS AS

% OF 2023
TARGET

NEO

  Salary  Target
Bonus%
           

Mr. Hornbuckle

   

$

2,000,000

   

 

200

%

  

$

4,000,000

   

$

4,774,912

   

 

119.4

%

Mr. Halkyard

   

 

1,100,000

   

 

150

%

  

 

1,650,000

   

 

1,969,651

   

 

119.4

%

Mr. Sanders

   

 

1,250,000

   

 

175

%

  

 

2,187,500

   

 

2,611,280

   

 

119.4

%

Mr. Fritz

   

 

1,250,000

   

 

100

%

  

 

1,250,000

   

 

1,398,418

   

 

111.9

%

Mr. McManus

   

 

900,000

   

 

125

%

  

 

1,125,000

   

 

1,342,944

   

 

119.4

%

With respect to Mr. Fritz, 50% of his bonus is based on achievement of the Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target as described above, with the remaining 50% based on the achievement of the following three strategic goals (which were unweighted):

Goal 1 – Operational/Financial Improvements in the Company’s Digital Ventures. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that the Company’s diversity and growth in the global online gaming industry and investment in BetMGM is important to the Company’s future. In evaluating this goal, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considered Mr. Fritz’s (i) successful oversight of the LeoVegas operational plan while balancing near term operating results and LeoVegas’ long-term strategic growth plan and (ii) (a) efforts to help BetMGM identify and improve product offerings and (b) efforts to monitor BetMGM’s operational performance and assist BetMGM management on performance to plan.

Goal 2 – Focus on Organic and Inorganic Growth in Digital Landscape. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee recognizes the importance of the Company’s strategy to be the global leader in premium gaming and entertainment. In evaluating Mr. Fritz’s performance on this goal, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considered efforts undertaken in 2023 to (i) build a pipeline of operator and content capital deployment opportunities, and (ii) execute on strategic transactions to assist the Company in achieving its digital growth strategy in consultation with the Board.

Goal 3 – Promote the Company’s Employees and Culture. The Human Capital and Compensation Committeebelieves in the importance of a positive work culture and that the Company’semployees are vital to the success of the organization. In evaluating Mr. Fritzon this goal, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considered efforts undertaken to build aninteractive leadership team, to identify and recruit candidates for key positionswithin this new organizational structure and to create a team culture thatinterfaces within the broader Company organization and BetMGM.

In January of 2024, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that Mr. Fritz achieved 95% on the enumerated strategic goals.

With respect to Goal 1, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee based its determination on several factors, including:

Achievement of LeoVegas’ revenue and EBITDA plans for 2023. Although 2023 revenue was lower than planned, LeoVegas achieved its forecasted EBITDA plan while making significant investments in both product and technology resources to support its long-term growth.

The successful launch of the BetMGM iGaming and online sports betting brand in the United Kingdom, which launched the Company’s strategy of expanding the BetMGM brand into international markets.

BetMGM achieved positive EBITDA in the second half of the year with 2023 net gaming revenue expected to be at the high end of BetMGM’s publicly announced guidance.

BetMGM launched the Single Account Single Wallet upgrade, which has already begun to deliver key benefits on customer acquisition, retention and engagement, and player value.

The Company continues to focus on improvements to BetMGM’s sports product offering in the United States, with the expectation that the Angstrom acquisition will provide beneficial pricing and technology solutions as well as differentiated capabilities beginning in 2024.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

57


Executive Compensation

With respect to Goal 2, the Human Capital & Compensation Committee based its determination on several factors, including:

Efforts undertaken to review numerous global expansion opportunities in the digital space.

The signing and closing of the Push Gaming acquisition.

With respect to Goal 3, the Human Capital & Compensation Committee based its determination on several factors, including:

The successful development of the digital organization via the hiring of several critical roles during the year.

The following tables set forth the percentages of achievement for the different bonus metrics and the bonus amounts payable to Mr. Fritz:

     Performance Goals  Actual  Funding

Measure

  Weighting Threshold  Target  Maximum  Results  (% Target)

EBITDAR ($ Mils)

   

 

50

%

  

$

2,932

   

$

3,665

   

$

4,215

   

$

3,823

   

 

128.7

%

Strategic Plan

   

 

50

%

  

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

n/a

   

 

95.0

%

Total

   

 

100

%

                          

 

111.9

%

Fiscal Year 2024

For fiscal year 2024, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has determined to continue with a meaningful financial goal for the full fiscal year. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee continues to believe that EBITDAR is an important component of the Company’s annual incentive bonus and, as a result, has established a full year EBITDAR goal (the “2024 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target”), weighted 70% for Messrs. Hornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders and McManus and 50% for Mr. Fritz. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee no longer believes that COVID-19 will continue to create uncertainty in the MGM China operating results and, as a result, has determined to include EBITDAR related to MGM China operations in the financial goal this year. In addition, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined that the 2024 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target should include BetMGM, LLC’s (“BetMGM”) target EBITDA in light of the increased strategic focus on the Company’s digital growth story. As a result, an amount equal to MGM China and BetMGM’s target Adjusted EBITDAR or EBITDA, as applicable (which, for BetMGM, will be calculated on a one-month lag basis), multiplied by the Company’s percentage ownership in each for the performance period will be included in the 2024 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target. The 2024 Compensation Adjusted EBITDAR Target approved by the Human Capital and Compensation Committee was consistent with the EBITDAR as set by management and approved by the Board in the budgeting process for 2024. Participants will be able to achieve 200% of their target bonus for maximum achievement of this goal.

With respect to Messrs. Hornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders and McManus, the remaining 30% will be determined based on the following strategic and social impact and sustainability goals: (1) Execution of the Company’s Strategic Plan in Consultation with the Board (weighted 20%) and (2) Execution of the Company’s Social Impact and Sustainability Strategy (weighted 10%). Participants will be able to achieve 200% of their target bonus for maximum achievement of these goals.

With respect to Mr. Fritz, the remaining 50% will be determined based on the achievement of the following goals (1) Execution of Digital Strategy (weighted 40%), (2) Promoting the Company’s Employees and Culture (weighted 10%). Mr. Fritz will be able to achieve 200% of his target bonus for maximum achievement of these goals.

Long-Term Equity Incentives

For 2023, our LTI compensation component consisted of grants of Absolute TSR PSUs, Relative TSR PSUs and RSUs. All forms of equity-based awards can receive dividend equivalent rights (that is, at the time dividends are paid to other stockholders of the Company, additional units are credited to the underlying equity award as if the dividend payments were immediately reinvested, which additional shares are subject to the same vesting and performance criteria as the underlying equity award).

58 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

Absolute TSR PSUs

The Absolute TSR PSU concept is that, while an executive is awarded a target number of shares to be paid at the end of a three-year cliff vesting period, (1) the actual number of shares earned depends on the Company’s TSR over the vesting period and (2) the target number of shares can only be earned if stock price appreciation measured over the three-year performance period, as adjusted for dividends, is at least 25%. The table below illustrates how payouts are calculated based on level of achievement. The beginning and ending prices are based on the average closing price of our common stock over the 60-calendar day period ending on the award date and the third anniversary of the award date, respectively. In the case of a change in control, the ending stock price is based on the stock price as of the date of the change in control, after giving effect to the payment of any dividends after the grant date and prior to the change in control.

    Performance1 Payout
    

Change

vs.
Target

 

Absolute

TSR

 

Shares

Earned2

 

Value

Delivered3

Maximum

    +60%   +100%   160%   320%
    

 

+20

%

  

 

+50

%

  

 

120

%

  

 

180

%

Target

   

 

+0

%

  

 

+25

%

  

 

100

%

  

 

125

%

    

 

-20

%

  

 

+0

%

  

 

80

%

  

 

80

%

Threshold

   

 

-40

%

  

 

-25

%

  

 

60

%

  

 

45

%

    

 

<-40

%

  

 

<-25

%

  

 

0

%

  

 

0

%

1

Measured using the 60-day average closing price on the date of grant.

2

Linear interpolation between defined points.

3

Assumes absolute TSR PSUs have an accounting value equal to the share price at grant.

While Absolute TSR PSUs provide some value even when the stock price declines (so long as the ending stock price is 75% or more of the beginning stock price), this design feature strongly magnifies the benefit of an increased stock price and the detriment of a decreased price.

Relative TSR PSUs

The Relative TSR PSU concept is that, while an executive is awarded a target number of shares to be paid at the end of a three-year cliff vesting period, the actual number of shares to be issued upon vesting is determined by ranking (1) the percentage increase/decrease in the Company’s value over the three-year measuring period against (2) the percentage increase/decrease in value of the other companies in the S&P 500. For this purpose, dividends are treated as reinvested in additional shares. The amount of shares ultimately received by the NEO at the end of the three-year period is based on the relative ranking of the Company’s TSR to the S&P 500 group. The table below illustrates how payouts are calculated based on level of achievement.

Performance

Relative
TSR
Funding
(% Target)
1,2

Maximum

75P 150% 
70P 140% 
65P 130% 
60P 120% 
55P 110% 

Target

50P 100% 
45P 90% 
40P 80% 
35P 70% 
30P 60% 

Threshold

25P 50% 
<25P 0% 

1.

Linear interpolation between defined points.

2.

Funding capped at 100% of target if absolute TSR is negative, unless relative TSR is above the 75th percentile.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

59


Executive Compensation

RSUs

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee continues to believe that RSUs should comprise a portion of the executive’s long-term incentives as they meaningfully support retention and tie executive compensation to our stock’s performance.

Each RSU entitles the holder to receive one share of our stock at vesting, with vesting being subject to continued employment on the applicable vesting dates. While the value of the RSUs fluctuates with Company performance (as reflected in the price of the Company’s stock), the RSUs retain some value even in situations where no performance share units are payable due to insufficient price performance, which structure encourages recipients to balance our short-term performance with the management of our long-term risks and long-term stock performance.

As in previous years, in making grants of Absolute TSR PSUs, Relative TSR PSUs, and RSUs to the NEOs in October 2023, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee continued to emphasize performance-based awards and allocated approximately 40% to RSUs, 30% to Absolute TSR PSUs and 30% to Relative TSR PSUs, based on fair value at the grant date. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee determined the size of each NEO’s award through a process that evaluated each NEO’s overall role in and contributions to the Company and other relevant factors, including competitive market data.

In determining the size of the awards, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee does not take into account the value realized by a NEO during the applicable fiscal year as a result of the vesting or settlement of equity awards granted during a prior year; the Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes that value realized by a NEO from any such equity award relates to services provided during the year of the grant or period of vesting. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee does not time the issuance or grant of any equity-based awards with the release of material, non-public information, nor do we time the release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of equity awards.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee awarded equity-based compensation to our NEOs in 2023 as follows:

NEO

  AWARD TYPE  GRANT
DATE
  UNITS  GRANT DATE FAIR
VALUE OF AWARDS

Mr. Hornbuckle

  RSU    10/02/2023    108,726   $4,000,000 
  Absolute TSR PSU    10/02/2023    88,185    3,000,000
   Relative TSR PSU    10/02/2023    82,493    3,000,000 

Mr. Halkyard

  RSU    10/02/2023    29,900   $1,100,000 
  Absolute TSR PSU    10/02/2023    24,251    825,000
   Relative TSR PSU    10/02/2023    22,686    825,000 

Mr. Sanders

  RSU    10/02/2023    40,772   $1,500,000 
  Absolute TSR PSU    10/02/2023    33,070    1,125,000
   Relative TSR PSU    10/02/2023    30,935    1,125,000 

Mr. Fritz

  RSU    10/02/2023    40,772   $1,500,000 
  Absolute TSR PSU    10/02/2023    33,070    1,125,000
   Relative TSR PSU    10/02/2023    30,935    1,125,000 

Mr. McManus

  RSU    10/02/2023    24,464   $900,000 
  Absolute TSR PSU    10/02/2023    19,842    675,000
   Relative TSR PSU    10/02/2023    18,561    675,000

Results of Performance Achieved during 2020-2023 Performance Period for PSUs granted in August 2020

In August 2020, the Company granted Absolute TSR PSU awards that were scheduled to cliff-vest based on the level of the Company’s share price appreciation measured over the applicable three-year performance period. In addition, in August 2020, the Company granted Relative TSR PSU awards that were scheduled to cliff-vest based on the Company’s relative TSR performance versus the S&P 500. Following the completion of the applicable performance period, it was determined that (i) for Absolute TSR PSUs, the ending average stock price (including the value of reinvested dividends) of $46.03 was equal to 211% of the “target price” of $21.85, and (ii) for Relative TSR PSUs, the Company’s TSR of 163.29%

60 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Executive Compensation

placed the Company’s absolute percentile ranking at the 92.96th percentile of the peer group. As a result, the executive officers became eligible to receive a number of shares equal to approximately 160% and 150% of their target number of Absolute TSR PSUs and Relative TSR PSUs, respectively.

Deferred Compensation Opportunities

Under our Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Plan (the “DCP”), our NEOs may elect to defer up to 50% of their base salary or 75% of the cash portion of their bonus on a pre-tax basis and accumulate tax-deferred earnings on their accounts. All of our NEOs are eligible to participate in the DCP. See “Compensation Tables—Nonqualified Deferred Compensation.” We believe that providing our NEOs with this deferral option is a cost-effective way to permit them to receive the tax benefits associated with delaying the income tax event on the compensation deferred, even though the related deduction for us also is deferred. The plan allows NEOs to allocate their account balances among different measurement options which are used as benchmarks for calculating amounts that are credited or debited to their account balances (for tax reasons, no ownership interest in the underlying funds is acquired). Our NEOs are also eligible to participate in our retirement savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code.

Severance and Change of Control Benefits

We believe that severance protections, including in the context of a change of control transaction, are important in attracting and retaining key executive officers. In addition, we believe they help ensure leadership continuity and sound decisions in the interest of our long-term success, particularly at times of major business transactions. We have agreed to provide our NEOs with severance benefits in the event that their employment is terminated (1) by us other than for good cause, (2) by them for good cause, or (3) as a result of their death or disability. Other than for equity awards that are not assumed by a purchaser as part of a change of control, no benefits are payable solely as a result of a change of control (i.e., there are no single trigger benefits), and the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has determined not to enter into any future agreements with executive officers that contain single trigger change of control benefits.

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee believes the services of our NEOs are extremely marketable, and that in retaining their services it is therefore necessary to provide a certain level of severance benefits. When determining the level of the severance benefits to be offered, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee also considers competitive market practices and the period of time it would normally take for an executive officer to find comparable employment. Details of the specific severance benefits available under various termination scenarios for our NEOs as of December 31, 2023 are discussed below in “Executive Compensation—Estimated Benefits upon Termination.”

Retirement, Death & Disability—Treatment of Equity Awards

Retirement is defined as a voluntary resignation by the participant with 90 days advance written notice where age plus service equals 65, with a minimum age of 55 and 5 years of service. It applies to awards outstanding six months prior to the date of retirement. Participants are entitled to (i) continued vesting in full of all RSUs, (ii), with respect to participants other than Messrs. Hornbuckle, McManus, and Sanders, continued vesting of a pro-rated portion of their PSU awards based upon the number of months employed during the applicable performance or vesting period and, (iii), with respect to Messrs. Hornbuckle, McManus, and Sanders, continued vesting in full of their outstanding and unvested PSU awards. Vesting of PSUs remains subject to achievement of underlying performance objectives. The retirement benefits are contingent upon compliance with certain confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition obligations set forth in the applicable award forms.

In the case of death or disability, the participant is entitled to full acceleration and payment of all such time-based awards as of the date of termination. Relative TSR PSUs will accelerate and vest in full based on relative performance to the date of termination. Absolute TSR PSUs will accelerate and vest in full based on target, if such termination is within the first twelve months of the performance period, or after such twelve-month period, based on actual performance projected through the end of the performance period.

Perquisites and Other Benefits

We pay premiums and other expenses for group life insurance, short-term disability insurance, long-term disability insurance, and business travel insurance on behalf of our NEOs. As an owner and operator of full-service resorts, we are able from time to time to provide benefits relating to hotel and related services, including in-town transportation, to our NEOs at little or no additional cost to us. We currently provide our NEOs with access to the fitness facilities located in the hotel where they are officed. In addition, for our convenience and the convenience of our NEOs, we provide complimentary

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

61


Executive Compensation

meals for business purposes at our restaurants. From time to time, we also provide relocation benefits to certain executive officers in order to assist such executives with their transition to living and working in Las Vegas, which we believe serves as an appropriate recruitment tool.

Under certain circumstances, executive officers are required by us to perform services in states other than their states of employment. As a result, such officers may incur incremental income tax obligations to such other states. To the extent there is no tax credit available in the applicable state of employment (for example, in Nevada), the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has approved a gross-up of the incremental state income tax obligations resulting from our requiring such executives to work in states other than the state where their services are normally rendered. This puts the executives in the same economic position as though they had worked in their normal places of business.

Pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Hornbuckle is entitled to request the personal use of aircraft, but he must reimburse us for costs associated with such use to the extent the value of such use (which we calculate based on the aggregate incremental cost to us) exceeds $250,000. In 2023, the aggregate incremental cost of Mr. Hornbuckle’s personal use of the aircraft was $206,319, which was below the cap. See the Summary Compensation Table for additional details.

OTHER COMPENSATION MATTERS

Prohibition on Short Sales, Derivatives Trading and Pledging and Hedging of Company Securities.

Our insider trading policy provides that certain employees (including our NEOs and other executive officers) and our directors may not enter into short sales of our securities or buy or sell exchange traded options on our securities. Our insider trading policy prohibits pledging or hedging of our securities by NEOs, executive officers and directors.

Compensation Risk Assessment

As part of its oversight, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee considers the impact of our executive compensation program, and the incentives created by the compensation awards that it administers, on our risk profile. We believe that our pay philosophy provides an effective balance in cash and equity mix, short- and longer-term performance periods, financial and non-financial performance, and allows for the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s exercise of discretion. Further, policies to mitigate compensation-related risk include vesting periods on long-term incentives, stock ownership guidelines, insider-trading prohibitions, and independent Human Capital and Compensation Committee oversight. Based upon this review, both for our executive officers and all other employees, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee has concluded that the risks arising from our compensation policies and practices are not reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

HUMAN CAPITALAND COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The Human Capital and Compensation Committee of the Board has reviewed and discussed with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” included in this Proxy Statement with management.Statement. Based on the Human Capital and Compensation Committee’s review and discussion with management, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

ANTHONY MANDEKIC,

ALEXIS HERMAN, Chair

WILLIE D. DAVIS

MARY CHRIS JAMMET

ROSE MCKINNEY-JAMES

DANIEL J. TAYLOR

MELVIN B. WOLZINGER

BEN WINSTON

The foregoing report of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee does not constitute soliciting material and shall not be deemed filed or incorporated by reference into any other Company filing under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act, except to the extent the Company specifically incorporates such report by reference therein.


23


EXECUTIVE AND DIRECTOR COMPENSATION AND OTHER INFORMATION
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation Discussion and Analysis
Executive Summary
The Compensation Committee’s primary objectives in setting compensation for executives are to attract talented and experienced executives and retain their services on a long-term basis; motivate the executives to achieve our annual and long-term strategic goals; align the interests of the executives with the interests of the Company and our stockholders; and encourage the executives to balance the management of long-term risks and long-term performance with yearly performance.
Key highlights of our executive compensation program include the following:
62 

 • 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

Performance objectives are set each year under our Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers for awards of non-equity incentive compensation and under our Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan for vesting of restricted stock units awarded to officers of the Company, which objectives are based on a percentage of the Company’s EBITDA (as determined as described below).
 • Under our Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan, our Named Executives receive an allocation of 75% stock appreciation rights and 25% restricted stock units in order to focus our Named Executives on long-term stockholder value.
• Equity-based compensation to our employees (including our executives) is granted primarily under a policy adopted by our Compensation Committee in 2008 that reduces unintended discrepancies in equity-based compensation and further aligns the interests of our executives with those of the stockholders by including a performance-based component with respect to equity-based awards to such executives.
• In the future, other than taxgross-ups that are required to be paid under existing employment agreements and gross-ups of taxes associated with health plan coverage, the Compensation Committee does not intend to approve further taxgross-ups.
• Awards made under our Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers are subject to a clawback policy that mandates repayment in certain instances when there is a restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year for which a bonus is paid.
• Base salaries of our executive officers generally remain unaltered through the term of their employment agreements unless the executive’s role or responsibility materially changes.
• Salary levels of our executive officers are set to assist the Company in retaining the services of our executive officers to develop and implement our strategic plans while also reflecting the minimum annual compensation that is appropriate based on each executive’s past and anticipated contributions to our business.
• The Compensation Committee retains the right to reduce or eliminate any executive’s award under our Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers in its sole and absolute discretion if it determines that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate with respect to the executive’s performance or any other factors material to the plan.


Roles in Establishing Compensation

Compensation Committee.  The Compensation Committee is responsible for establishing, implementing and reviewing the compensation program for our employees, including the executive officers. The compensation for our Named Executives is presented in the tables that follow this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, beginning with the “Summary Compensation Table.” Our “Named Executives” in any fiscal year are defined pursuant to SEC rules as any person who served as our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, our other three most highly compensated executive officers at the end of the last fiscal year, and up to two additional individuals who would


24

Tables


have been Named Executives but for the fact that they were not serving as an executive officer at the end of that fiscal year. Accordingly, in 2010, our Named Executives were:
• James J. Murren — Chairman of the Board, Chief Executive Officer and President
• Daniel J. D’Arrigo — Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer
• Robert H. Baldwin — Chief Design and Construction Officer
• Corey I. Sanders — Chief Operating Officer
• William J. Hornbuckle, IV — Chief Marketing Officer
The Compensation Committee, among other things, recommends the executive compensation policy to our Board of Directors, determines compensation of our executive officers, determines the performance criteria and incentive awards to be granted pursuant to our Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (the “Incentive Plan”) and administers and approves the granting of equity-based awards under our Amended and Restated 2005 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “Omnibus Incentive Plan”). The Compensation Committee’s authority and oversight extends to total compensation, including base salaries, bonuses, non-equity incentive awards, equity-based awards and other forms of compensation.
Executive Officers.  In carrying out its functions, the Compensation Committee obtains recommendations from certain of our executive officers with respect to various elements of compensation, including, but not limited to, determining the employees to whom share-based awards are granted. The Compensation Committee consults with certain of the executive officers to obtain performance results, legal and regulatory guidance, and market and industry data that may be relevant in determining compensation. In addition, the Compensation Committee consults with the Chief Executive Officer regarding our performance goals and the performance of our executive officers. Furthermore, the Chief Executive Officer meets with the Chair of the Compensation Committee and our Lead Independent Director to discuss the Chief Executive Officer’s performance during the prior year, including with respect to strategic planning, geographical and market expansion, management of new operations, projects and investments, succession planning and interactions and working relations with the Board.
Other than in connection with negotiating their respective employment agreements and other than with respect to participation by our Chief Executive Officer in connection with determining the performance criteria for his annual bonus under our Incentive Plan, the executive officers do not participate in determining the amount and type of compensation they are paid. Instead, the Compensation Committee’s assessment of the individual performance of the executive officers is based primarily on the Compensation Committee’s independent observation and judgment of the responsibilities, duties, performance and leadership skills of the executive officers as well as the Company’s overall performance.
Outside Consultants.  The Compensation Committee periodically engages outside consultants on various compensation-related matters. The Compensation Committee has the authority to engage the services of independent legal counsel and consultants to assist the Committee in analyzing and reviewing the compensation policies, the elements of compensation, and the aggregate compensation to the executive officers. In 2010, the Compensation Committee engaged outside consultants as follows:
• Deloitte & Touche LLP was engaged by the Compensation Committee to perform certain agreed upon procedures in connection with the Compensation Committee’s review of the achievement of the financial goals set pursuant to the Incentive Plan and the corresponding non-equity incentive awards payable to the Named Executives under such plan.
• Frederic W. Cook & Co., Inc. (“FW Cook”), an independent compensation consultant that performs services only for the Compensation Committee, was engaged by the Compensation Committee to assist the Compensation Committee with various projects, including the design of the bonus targets under the Incentive Plan, the award of long-term equity incentives, and compliance with Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended.


25

COMPENSATION TABLES


SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

Objectives of Our Compensation Program
The Compensation Committee’s primary objectives in setting total compensation and the elements of compensation for each of the Named Executives are to:
• attract talented and experienced Named Executives and retain their services on a long-term basis;
• motivate the Named Executives to achieve our annual and long-term strategic goals;
• align the interests of the Named Executives with the interests of the Company and those of our stockholders; and
• encourage the Named Executives to balance the management of long-term risks and long-term performance with yearly performance.
Certain Factors in Determining Compensation
Employment Agreements.  We have entered into employment agreements with each of our Named Executives, including new employment agreements with Mr. Baldwin, our Chief Design and Construction Officer, and Mr. Hornbuckle, our Chief Marketing Officer, effective December 13, 2010 and September 14, 2010, respectively. The Compensation Committee believes these agreements are necessary for the continued availability of the Named Executives in developing and implementing our strategic plans throughout the world. The employment agreements determine the annual base salaries, severance and other benefits for the Named Executives, as further described below.
Incentive Plan.  As further described below, the Compensation Committee adopts performance goals on an annual basis, including specific performance objectives, and establishes computation formulas or methods for determining each participant’s non-equity incentive award for that year under the Incentive Plan. Our Chief Executive Officer participates in determining the performance criteria for his annual bonus under the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee has no discretion to increase the amount of any participant’s award as determined by the formula, but even if the performance goals are met for any particular year, the Compensation Committee may reduce or eliminate any participant’s award if it determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate with respect to the participant’s performance or any other factors material to the goals, purposes, and administration of the Incentive Plan. In December 2010, the Compensation Committee determined that it would not reduce or eliminate any of the participants’ awards for fiscal year 2010.
Impact of Tax Rules.  Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Internal Revenue Code”), disallows a tax deduction to public companies for compensation over $1 million paid to such company’s chief executive officer and its three other highest paid executive officers other than its chief financial officer. Qualifying performance-based compensation is not subject to the $1 million deduction limitation if certain requirements are met. The Compensation Committee has determined that a substantial portion of the potential compensation payable to Named Executives on an annual basis should be based on the achievement of performance-based targets or otherwise qualify as deductible under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code. Awards to these individuals under our Incentive Plan and certain annual grants of equity-based compensation they receive under our Omnibus Incentive Plan are intended to satisfy the requirements for qualifying performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) so that compensation paid pursuant to these awards and grants will be tax deductible. However, interpretations of and changes in applicable tax laws and regulations as well as other factors beyond the control of the Compensation Committee can affect deductibility of compensation, and there can be no assurance that compensation paid to our executive officers who are covered by Section 162(m) will be deductible. In addition, the Compensation Committee reserves the right to use its judgment to authorize payment of compensation that may not be deductible when the Compensation Committee believes that such payments are appropriate and in the best interests of the Company, taking into consideration changing business conditions, the performance of its employees, and other relevant factors. In this regard, in 2010, the Compensation Committee approved discretionary cash bonuses to certain Named Executives, as discussed below.
Targeted Overall Compensation and Peer Group Review.  In order to assess whether the compensation awarded to our executive officers is fair and reasonable, the Compensation Committee periodically gathers and


26


reviews data regarding the compensation practices and policies of other public companies in our industry. The peer group compensation data is reviewed as a check for the Compensation Committee to determine whether the compensation paid to our executive officers is generally competitive with that paid to the executive officers of our peer group companies. The Compensation Committee does not, however, annually adjust the compensation paid to our executive officers based on this information.
The relevant information for members of the peer group is gathered from publicly available proxy data, which data generally reflects only the compensation paid by these companies in years prior to their disclosure. When reviewing the compensation of the Named Executives of the peer group, the Compensation Committee compares the market overlap, results of operations, stockholders’ equity and market capitalization of the peer group with ours. In addition, the Compensation Committee also reviews the total compensation, as well as the amount and type of each element of such compensation, of the Named Executives of the peer group with duties and responsibilities comparable to those of our Named Executives. In 2010, the Compensation Committee reviewed the compensation data of the following companies:
• Boyd Gaming Corporation
• International Game Technology
• Las Vegas Sands Corporation
• Marriott International, Inc.
• Starwood Hotels & Resorts Worldwide, Inc.
• Wynn Resorts, Limited
Elements of Compensation
Base Annual Compensation.  The Named Executives’ employment agreements provide for annual base salaries as described under “Certain Factors in Determining Compensation — Employment Agreements” and “Summary Compensation Table,” and each Named Executive generally remains at the annual base salary under his applicable employment agreement for the term of the agreement unless his role or responsibilities materially change. In connection with finalizing the employment agreements (including any amendments to such agreements) with the Named Executives, including the terms of Mr. Baldwin’s and Mr. Hornbuckle’s new employment agreements, the Compensation Committee approved the annual base salaries set forth in such agreements that it believed would be required to retain the services of the Named Executives for the term of the employment agreements and to reflect the minimum annual compensation that is appropriate for each of them based on their past and anticipated contributions to our business. In 2010, Mr. D’Arrigo’s annual base salary was increased from $500,000 to $675,000, Mr. Baldwin’s annual base salary was increased from $1,500,000 to $1,650,000, Mr. Sanders’ annual base salary was increased from $700,000 to $800,000 (and will increase an additional $50,000 per year for the next two years), and Mr. Hornbuckle’s annual base salary was increased from $900,000 to $1,100,000, in each case because of the additional duties and responsibilities attendant to their positions and the value and importance of the service that they will provide in the future, and, in the case of Mr. Hornbuckle, $100,000 of his raise was due to an automatic salary increase contemplated by his former employment agreement.
Non-Equity Incentive Awards.  Non-equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan, when appropriate, are determined by the Compensation Committee after the end of the fiscal year. Only an individual who (i) at any time during the taxable year served as the chief executive officer of the Company or acted in such capacity, or (ii) is among the four highest compensated executive officers of the Company, other than the chief executive officer, and is designated by the Compensation Committee may participate in the Incentive Plan. Note that if our stockholders approve the Amended and Restated Incentive Plan (see Proposal 6), eligible participants will include only those executive officers of the Company who are (i) officers among the Named Executives in the Company’s annual proxy statements, and (ii) employees of the Company who may become a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code and such other employees, in each case, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion.


27


Within 90 days of the beginning of each calendar year, the Compensation Committee establishes performance goals, including specific performance objectives based on our financial performance targets approved by the Board and computation formulas or methods for determining each participant’s non-equity incentive award under the Incentive Plan for that year. For 2010, the Compensation Committee established performance objectives based on a percentage of “EBITDA,” as defined by the Compensation Committee and approved by the Board for this purpose. For 2010, EBITDA consisted of corporate consolidated EBITDA excluding extraordinary items of the Company, determined under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and excluding the following nonrecurring items: (i) gains or losses from the sale of operating properties, (ii) EBITDA attributable to operations of assets for the period prior to their disposal, (iii) gains or losses on insurance proceeds related to asset claims, (iv) certain asset write-downs orwrite-ups, gains or losses from acquisition, sale, disposition or exchange of our debt securities, and (v) certain legal and advisory fees. For 2010, the Compensation Committee established the EBITDA target at $1,487,400,000, subject to potential downward adjustment in the case of certain discontinuances of operations (the “Performance Target”). The Compensation Committee further determined that, in order for any grant to be earned under the Incentive Plan, the minimum performance measure during 2010 must have been at least $1,041,180,000 (70% of the Performance Target). In the event that 70% of the Performance Target was achieved, the participants would have been eligible to receive 50% of their target award. Thereafter, the awards would have increased on a sliding scale basis so that if, for example, 85% of the Performance Target was achieved, the participants would have been eligible to receive 75% of their target award, and if 100% of the Performance Target was achieved, the participants would have been eligible to receive 100% of their target award. Between 100% and 120% of the Performance Target, the bonus would have increased proportionately up to a maximum amount equal to 150% of the target bonus so that, for example, if 110% of the Performance Target was achieved, the participants would have been eligible to receive 125% of their target award. The Compensation Committee set the target non-equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan for 2010 as the following percentages of the participants’ applicable salaries at January 1, 2010: 200%, 75%, 150%, 100%, and 100% for Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle, respectively. Pursuant to the Incentive Plan, at or after the end of each calendar year, the Compensation Committee is required to certify in writing whether the pre-established performance goals and objectives were satisfied for that year. For 2010, the Compensation Committee performed this step in March 2011. In 2010, 72.8% of the Performance Target was achieved such that Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle each received 54.6% of their target awards.
For 2011, the Compensation Committee has determined that, in order for any annual non-equity incentive award to be earned under the Incentive Plan, the minimum EBITDA must be at least 70% of the targeted EBITDA for 2011, as approved by the Compensation Committee and the Board solely for the purposes of the Incentive Plan. For 2011, EBITDA calculated for purposes of the Incentive Plan will consist of corporate consolidated EBITDA excluding extraordinary items of the Company, determined under GAAP and excluding the following nonrecurring items: (i) gains or losses from the sale of operating properties, joint venture or partnership interests, and land; (ii) EBITDA attributable to operations of assets for the period prior to their disposal; (iii) gains or losses attributable to any consolidation of a joint venture or partnership in our financial statements; (iv) any write-down orwrite-up of the value of any portion of real estate or other capital assets or investments not disposed of; (v) gains or losses on insurance proceeds related to asset claims; (vi) gains or losses arising out of acquisitions, sales or dispositions, or exchanges of our debt securities; (vii) certain legal and advisory costs; (viii) gains from a potential initial public offering relating to our Macau joint venture; and (ix) EBITDA attributable to any entity acquired by us during 2011. The EBITDA target for purposes of the Incentive Plan will be adjusted downward in the case of certain discontinuances of operations and will also be adjusted accordingly if any entity currently accounted for under the equity method is subsequently accounted for on a consolidated basis. The Compensation Committee set the target non-equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan for 2011 as the following percentages of the participants’ applicable salaries at January 1, 2011: 200%, 100%, 163.63%, 125%, and 125% for Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle, respectively. Awards payable under the Incentive Plan for 2011 will be determined on the same sliding scale basis described above with respect to awards paid under the Incentive Plan for 2010. In determining the minimum performance measure and the target non-equity incentive award for 2011, the Compensation Committee considered the EBITDA projected by management for 2011 in relation to the prior year’s performance, general economic conditions, the competitiveness of our executive compensation within the industry, and the anticipated value of the services to be provided by the participants. Based on the foregoing, the


28


Compensation Committee believed, at the time the target performance measure was set for 2011, that the target performance goals were attainable.
Prior to payment, awards determined under the Incentive Plan are subject to reduction or elimination in the sole discretion of the Compensation Committee. The awards described above under the Incentive Plan are also subject to repayment (or “clawback”) in the discretion of the Compensation Committee if there is a restatement of the Company’s financial statements for the fiscal year for which a bonus is paid, other than a restatement due to changes in accounting principles or applicable law, and the participant has received an “excess bonus” for the relevant fiscal year. An excess bonus generally equals the difference between the bonus paid to the participant and the payment or grant that would have been made based on the restated financial results. The Company intends to comply with the provisions of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010 (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) and adopt a revised mandatory clawback policy that will require the Company, in the event of a restatement, to recover from current and former executives any incentive-based compensation, for the three years preceding the restatement, that would not have been awarded under the restated financial statements.
In addition, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Murren is eligible to receive four equal cash awards of up to $4.25 million in the aggregate (each, an “Additional Cash Award” and collectively, the “Additional Cash Awards”) to be awarded pursuant to the Incentive Plan, with one of such Additional Cash Awards to become vested, subject to satisfaction of certain conditions, at the end of each of four six-month periods the first of which ended on September 30, 2009. Such Additional Cash Awards are in addition to any annual awards made to Mr. Murren under the Incentive Plan. In the event that any Additional Cash Awards vest and are earned, such Additional Cash Awards, unlike other awards made under the Incentive Plan, will not be subject to reduction at the discretion of the Compensation Committee. The Compensation Committee determined that, because the awards under the Incentive Plan may be reduced or eliminated at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, ensuring that a portion of Mr. Murren’s cash compensation that is dependent on our performance not be subject to reduction at the discretion of the Compensation Committee was important to assist the Company’s efforts in continuing to retain the services of Mr. Murren and to further align his interests with those of our other stockholders. Each of the Additional Cash Awards will be deemed vested and earned at the end of the corresponding six-month period if the EBITDA of the Company (determined as described above) for such six-month period is equal to or higher than $350,000,000, subject to Mr. Murren’s continued employment through the end of such six-month period. Any Additional Cash Award that does not become vested and earned upon the end of the corresponding six-month period (solely as a result of the failure to meet the EBITDA target) will be deemed vested and earned on any subsequent vesting date in the event that the average EBITDA for the six-month periods beginning on April 1, 2009 and ending on such subsequent vesting date is equal to or greater than such target EBITDA for the corresponding six-month period; provided, however, the foregoing is not applicable if Mr. Murren’s employment has been terminated by the Company for good cause or by Mr. Murren without good cause, in each case, on or prior to such subsequent vesting date. The Additional Cash Awards that were vested and earned prior to March 31, 2011 were paid in April 2011, and the Additional Cash Awards scheduled to vest and become earned on March 31, 2011 will, subject to certification by the Compensation Committee that the applicable goals have been achieved, be payable within 90 days thereafter. The Company achieved EBITDA (determined as described above) of $467,570,000 and $567,947,000 for the six-month periods ended March 31, 2010 and September 31, 2010, respectively. As a result, Mr. Murren earned the $1,062,500 Additional Cash Award that vested March 31, 2010 and the $1,062,500 Additional Cash Award that vested September 30, 2010.
In addition, the Compensation Committee has the ability to grant bonus awards outside of the Incentive Plan in the Compensation Committee’s discretion; however, any such bonus payments may not be entitled to the same beneficial tax treatment provided with respect to the non-equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan. Discretionary bonuses may be awarded in any amount that the Compensation Committee deems appropriate. In March 2011, the Compensation Committee determined to recommend to the non-management members of the Board that discretionary bonuses be awarded to Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders and Hornbuckle. The non-management members of the Board subsequently determined to award discretionary bonuses in the amounts of $415,000, $300,000 and $340,000, respectively, in connection with such executives’ efforts in 2010 related to executing capital raising transactions and other corporate initiatives and their other superior efforts in their respective roles. The Compensation Committee also determined to recommend to the non-management members of the Board that a


29


discretionary bonus of $750,000 be awarded to Mr. Murren. The non-management members of the Board subsequently determined to award such discretionary bonus to Mr. Murren, in connection with his superior leadership and efforts in 2010 related to our capital market transactions, amended credit facility, joint ventures, tax initiatives, legal matters, launch of our M Life loyalty program and various successful cost-savingand/or revenue-generating corporate initiatives.
Equity-Based Compensation.  The Compensation Committee grants equity-based compensation under the Omnibus Incentive Plan, which allows for the issuance of various forms of equity-based compensation, such as stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, and restricted stock units (“RSUs”). The Compensation Committee administers all aspects of the Omnibus Incentive Plan.
Equity-based compensation to our employees, including the Named Executives, is granted primarily under the equity-based compensation policy adopted by the Compensation Committee in October 2008 (the “Annual Program”). Prior to the adoption of the Annual Program, the Compensation Committee had granted equity-based awards in connection with milestone events, such as in connection with a new hire, employment contract renewal, significant promotions, and significant corporate transactions. The Compensation Committee adopted the Annual Program to reduce unintended discrepancies in equity-based compensation resulting from varying exercise prices of SARs and stock options depending on the year of issue, to provide similar vesting schedules for employees receiving the same type of awards during any given year, and to further align the interests of certain executives of the Company, including the Named Executives, with those of the stockholders by including a performance-based component with respect to equity-based awards to such executives.
The Compensation Committee has determined to issue both SARs and RSUs under the Annual Program. Each SAR entitles the recipient to receive upon exercise a payment in stock equal to the appreciation in the value of a share of Company stock from the date of issue to the date of exercise. Accordingly, the employee receives value from his or her SAR only if there is an increase in the value of a share. In contrast, each RSU entitles the holder to receive one share of Company stock at vesting. Thus, while an increase in the value of Company stock increases the value of each RSU, an RSU has value even if there is no increase in the value of a share; an RSU thus has value as a retention incentive even if there is no increase in stock price. The Compensation Committee has determined that a combination of both SARs and RSUs is the best design from an executive compensation perspective since this results in some retention incentive even when stock prices have not increased. As noted below, however, for more senior employees, 75% of the awards are in the form of SARs, in order to focus executive officers on long-term stockholder value. SARs and RSUs vest ratably over four years. This vesting schedule encourages holders of awards to balance our short-term performance with the management of our long-term risks and long-term performance.
In connection with the Annual Program, the Compensation Committee reserves on an annual basis a pool of equity awards comprised of SARs and RSUs based on a number of “SARs-equivalent” awards. With respect to employees with annual base salaries equal to or greater than $250,000, including the Named Executives, 75% of the SARs-equivalent awards were made in the form of SARs and 25% in the form of RSUs. With respect to employees with annual base salaries below $250,000, 50% of the SARs-equivalent awards will be made in the form of SARs and 50% in the form of RSUs.
The Compensation Committee established performance objectives as part of the vesting criteria for RSUs issued to certain officers. The Compensation Committee determined that, in order for any RSUs awarded to the officers of the Company in 2010 to vest ratably over four years, Company EBITDA for the six-month period ending on June 30, 2011 must be at least 50% of the targeted EBITDA as determined in the budget adopted by the Board of Directors for such period, excluding certain predetermined items. For this purpose EBITDA is computed in the same manner as under the Incentive Plan.
In determining the size of the awards to be awarded to employees, the Compensation Committee does not take into account an employee’s holdings of vested but unexercised awards, believing that calibrating future awards based on the holdings of previously vested but unexercised awards would create incentives for employees to exercise or sell shares subject to their prior grants. The Compensation Committee also does not take into account the value realized by an employee during a fiscal year from the exercise of equity awards granted during a prior year, believing that value realized by an employee from the exercise of any such equity award relates to services provided during the year of the grant or of vesting and not necessarily during the year of exercise.


30


In connection with the Annual Program, the Compensation Committee awarded equity-based compensation to the Named Executives in 2010 as follows:
• RSUs to Messrs. Murren and D’Arrigo in the amount of 35,000 and 5,000, respectively.
• SARs with an exercise price of $11.36 and in the amount of 262,500 and 37,500 to Messrs. Murren and D’Arrigo, respectively.
The Compensation Committee, in its discretion, may grant equity-based awards outside of the Annual Program in connection with a promotion or the approval of a new or revised employment agreement. In 2010, in connection with new employment agreements for Messrs. Baldwin and Hornbuckle, and Mr. Sanders’ promotion to Chief Operating Officer of the Company, Mr. Baldwin was awarded 750,000 SARs with an exercise price of $13.18, and Messrs. Sanders and Hornbuckle were awarded SARs with an exercise price of $11.36 in the amount of 100,000 and 75,000, respectively. The Compensation Committee determined that, in light of the responsibility that has been assumed and will continue to be assumed by Messrs. Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle, a significant equity-based award in connection with their new employment agreementsand/or promotions was necessary to sufficiently compensate such Named Executives, and to assist the Company in the continued retention of their services. The SARs generally vest over a period of four years, with 25% vesting each year if such Named Executive is employed on the vesting date (provided that each Named Executive may be entitled to certain terminationand/or change of control vesting and exercise protections as specified in the applicable grant agreementand/or employment agreement), and expire seven years from the date of the grant. To date, none of these SARs has vested.
In connection with any award of stock options or SARs, the exercise price for such stock options or SARs is established as the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the day of the Compensation Committee meeting on which such award is approved. With respect to a grant of an equity award to a new employee, although the Compensation Committee may pre-approve the terms of employment — including the proposed equity compensation — offered to a potential new employee prior to the acceptance or commencement of the employment, such grant of stock options or SARs made in connection with such new employment is subject to approval by the Compensation Committee and, if approved, occurs at the next scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee following the commencement of such employment, and the exercise price of stock options or SARs granted in connection with such employment is established as the closing price of our Common Stock on the NYSE on the date the Compensation Committee awards such grant. With respect to equity awards granted in connection with the approval by the Compensation Committee of a new or revised employment agreement, such grants are considered and, if approved, awarded at the regularly scheduled meeting of the Compensation Committee during which such employment agreement is approved. The Compensation Committee does not time the issuance or grant of any equity-based awards with the release of material, non-public information. In addition, we do not time the release of material non-public information for the purpose of affecting the value of equity awards.
Retirement Benefits.  As part of our overall benefits program, we have provided a traditional 401(k) plan as well as a nonqualified deferred compensation plan (the “DCP”), and in the past, a supplemental executive retirement plan (the “SERP”). These programs have been designed to provide a measure of long-term security to the participants and to provide an additional incentive for the participants to remain with us.
In December 2007, the Compensation Committee determined that, commencing January 1, 2008, no new persons would be added as participants in the SERP. In November 2008, as part of our ongoing cost savings measures, the Compensation Committee approved amendments to the DCP and SERP which suspended our matching contributions to the DCP for periods after January 1, 2009 and our contributions to the SERP for periods after October 1, 2008. In addition, we terminated certain predecessor DCP and SERP plans during 2008, prompting the Company to make certain payments to participants in 2008. The amendments allowed participants to make one-time elections to receive, without penalty, all or a portion of their vested account balances under such plans in a lump sum payment within 60 days of January 1, 2009, consistent with certain transitional relief provided by the Internal Revenue Service pursuant to rules governing nonqualified deferred compensation. No Company contributions have been made to either the DCP or the SERP since 2008, and none of the Named Executives are current participants in the SERP.


31


The Company has a retirement savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code for eligible employees. The plan allows employees, including our Named Executives, to defer, within prescribed limits, up to 30% (increasing to 75% beginning on January 1, 2011) of their income on a pre-tax basis through contributions to the plans. The 401(k) match was suspended for all participants in 2009. However, we reinstated a more limited 401(k) Company contribution in 2011 and will continue to monitor the plan contributions as the economy changes.
We also maintain the DCP for certain key employees. The DCP allows participants to defer up to 50% their salary or 75% of their non-equity incentive awards on a pre-tax basis and accumulate tax-deferred earnings on their accounts. Until January 1, 2009, we matched up to 4% of the participants’ base salary, less any Company contribution to the participants’ 401(k) account, which contribution vests ratably over a3-year period. The contributions made by participants vest immediately. All of the Named Executives except Mr. Baldwin are current participants in the DCP.
Perquisites and Other Benefits.  As an owner and operator of full-service hotels, we are able from time to time to provide perquisites relating to hotel and related services, including security and in-town transportation, to the Named Executives at little or no additional cost to us. We currently provide access to the fitness facilities located in the hotel in which a Named Executive’s office is located. In addition, for our convenience and the convenience of our executive officers, we provide complimentary meals for business purposes at our restaurants to the Named Executives. As shown below in the Summary Compensation Table, the Company also provides taxgross-ups to certain of its Named Executives. Going forward, other than taxgross-ups that are required to be paid under existing employment agreements and gross-ups of taxes associated with health plan coverage, the Compensation Committee does not intend to approve any further taxgross-ups.
Pursuant to their employment agreements and subject to certain conditions, Messrs. Murren and Baldwin are permitted to use the aircraft owned by us for business purposes. Additionally, Mr. Murren may request the personal use of such aircraft; however, the Company is not obligated to make the aircraft available for more than two personal round trips in any calendar year, subject to certain conditions and the aircraft’s availability. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Company invoiced Mr. Murren a total amount of $66,921 in connection with 24 of Mr. Murren’s personal flights, which amount represents a portion of the costs associated with such flights and was reimbursed by Mr. Murren pursuant to a time sharing agreement. In 2010, the unreimbursed portion of the aggregate incremental costs associated with Mr. Murren’s personal use of the Company’s aircraft was $374,514 and $24,551 was imputed to his income. Additionally, in connection with Mr. Sanders’ personal use of the Company’s aircraft, in 2010, the incremental costs associated with Mr. Sanders’ use of the Company’s aircraft was $5,434 and $523 was imputed to his income.
In addition, the aggregate amount of premiums paid for group life insurance, short term disability insurance, long term disability insurance, business travel insurance, and health plan coverage and associated taxes on behalf of Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders, and Hornbuckle in 2010 was $108,673, $26,443, $24,660, $16,830, and $33,893, respectively. Further, pursuant to his employment agreement, Mr. Murren will receive an annual $100,000 payment to be applied to his life insurance premiums or such other use as he determines.
In 2010, the Company also paid legal fees equal to $36,319 on behalf of Mr. Baldwin in conjunction with the negotiation of his employment agreement with the Company.
Severance Benefits and Change of Control.  In order to assist us in retaining the services of the executive officers, we have agreed to provide them with severance benefits in the event that their employment is terminated by the Company for other than good cause, by the executives for good cause, by the Company as a result of death or disability or in the event of or in connection with a change of control (each scenario as defined in their respective employment agreements). The Compensation Committee believes the services of the Named Executives are extremely marketable, and that in retaining their services it is therefore necessary to provide assurances to the Named Executives that we will not terminate their employment without cause unless we provide a certain level of severance benefits. When determining the level of the severance benefits to be offered in the employment agreements, the Compensation Committee also considered the period of time it would normally require an executive officer to find comparable employment. The details of the specific severance benefits available under various termination or change of control scenarios for the Named Executives are discussed in the “Potential


32


Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section below, along with an estimate of the amounts to be paid to each Named Executive under each scenario.
Summary Compensation Table
The following table summarizes the compensation of the Named ExecutivesNEOs for the years ended December 31, 2010, 20092023, 2022 and 2008.
                                     
              Change in
    
          Stock
   Pension Value
    
          Appreciation
   and
    
          Rights and
 Non-Equity
 Nonqualified
    
        Stock
 Option
 Incentive Plan
 Deferred
 All Other
  
    Salary
 Bonus
 Awards
 Awards
 Compensation
 Compensation
 Compensation
  
Name and Title
 Year (A) (B) (C) (D) (E) Earnings (F) Total
 
James J. Murren  2010  $2,000,000  $750,000  $397,600  $1,732,605  $4,310,424  $  $585,274  $9,775,903 
Chairman, Chief Executive  2009   2,038,462   500,000      7,094,400   3,455,368      664,213   13,752,443 
Officer, President and Director  2008   1,500,000      356,250   1,771,144         442,039   4,069,433 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  2010  $629,808  $415,000  $56,800  $247,515  $204,884  $  $26,443  $1,580,450 
Executive Vice President,  2009   500,000   475,000   50,776   238,405         37,395   1,301,576 
Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer  2008   500,000      57,000   283,383         116,531   956,914 
Robert H. Baldwin  2010  $1,648,187  $1,500,000  $  $5,745,000  $1,229,301  $  $60,979  $10,183,467 
Chief Design and  2009   1,500,000      288,500   1,354,575   1,914,294      75,477   5,132,846 
Construction Officer and Director  2008   1,500,000      356,250   1,771,144         460,888   4,088,282 
Corey I. Sanders  2010  $729,176  $300,000  $  $660,040  $382,449  $  $22,264  $2,093,929 
Chief Operating Officer                                    
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  2010  $1,003,736  $340,000  $  $495,030  $491,720  $  $33,893  $2,364,379 
Chief Marketing Officer                                    
2021.

NAME AND TITLE

 YEAR SALARY(A) BONUS STOCK
AWARDS(B)
 NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE
PLAN
COMPENSATION(C)
 ALL OTHER
COMPENSATION(D)
 TOTAL

William J. Hornbuckle

Chief Executive Officer

and President

   2023  $2,000,000  $  $10,000,000  $4,774,912  $228,882  $17,003,794
  

 

2022

  

 

1,667,123

  

 

  

 

10,000,000

  

 

4,328,524

  

 

242,428

  

 

16,238,075

  

 

2021

  

 

1,500,000

  

 

  

 

8,000,000

  

 

3,609,375

  

 

165,149

  

 

13,274,524

Jonathan S. Halkyard

Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer

   2023  $1,100,000  $  $2,750,000  $1,969,651  $20,895  $5,840,546
  

 

2022

  

 

966,849

  

 

  

 

2,750,000

  

 

2,017,774

  

 

41,017

  

 

5,775,640

   2021   875,342      1,800,000   1,856,250   127,012   4,658,604

Corey Sanders

Chief Operating Officer

   2023  $1,250,000  $  $3,750,000  $2,611,280  $18,475  $7,629,755
  

 

2022

  

 

1,083,562

  

 

  

 

3,750,000

  

 

2,423,189

  

 

19,163

  

 

7,275,914

  

 

2021

  

 

1,000,000

  

 

  

 

3,935,000

  

 

2,062,500

  

 

24,423

  

 

7,021,923

Gary Fritz

President, Interactive

   2023  $1,250,000  $  $3,750,000  $1,398,418  $  $6,398,418
  

 

2022

  

 

382,830

  

 

  

 

3,750,000

  

 

312,500

  

 

9,361

  

 

4,454,691

John McManus

Chief Legal and Administrative Officer and Secretary

   2023  $900,000  $  $2,250,000  $1,342,944  $25,078  $4,518,022
  

 

2022

  

 

766,849

  

 

  

 

2,250,000

  

 

1,305,818

  

 

42,556

  

 

4,365,223

  

 

2021

  

 

700,000

  

 

  

 

1,750,000

  

 

1,155,000

  

 

8,533

  

 

3,613,533

(A)On April 6, 2009, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Murren that provides for a term through April 7, 2013

See “Compensation Discussion and an annual base salaryAnalysis—Elements of $2,000,000. Pursuant to the new employment agreement, Mr. Murren’s new annual base salary retroactively became effective as of December 1, 2008,Compensation—Annual Base Salary and in April 2009 the Company paid Mr. Murren a lump sum of approximately $192,300 to reflect the retroactive increase in base salary from December 1, 2008 to April 6, 2009. $38,462, representing the portion of the lump sum payment attributable to the December 2008 retroactive increase, is included in Mr. Murren’s 2009 salary reflected above. Mr. Murren’s previous employment agreement, which was entered into on September 16, 2005, provided for a term through January 4, 2010 and an annual base salary of $1,500,000. On September 10, 2007, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. D’Arrigo, which we amended on December 31, 2008. Mr. D’Arrigo’s employment agreement provides for a term through September 10, 2011 (with successive three-month automatic renewals, unless the agreement is otherwise terminated), an annual base salary of $500,000, and an annual bonus of up to 100% of annual base salary. In June 2010, Mr. D’Arrigo’s base salary was increased to $675,000. Effective December 13, 2010, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Baldwin that provides for a term through December 13, 2014 and an annual base salary of $1,650,000. Pursuant to the new employment agreement, Mr. Baldwin’s new annual base salary retroactively became effective as of January 5, 2010, and in December 2010, the Company paid Mr. Baldwin a lump sum of approximately $140,770 to reflect the retroactive increase in base salary from January 5, 2010 to December 13, 2010, which is included in Mr. Baldwin’s 2010 salary reflected above. Mr. Baldwin’s previous employment agreement, which was entered into on September 16, 2005 and amended on December 31, 2008, provided for a term through January 4, 2010 (with successive three-month automatic renewals, unless the agreement was otherwise terminated) and an annual base salary of $1,500,000. We do not provide additional director compensation to officers who serve on the Board of Directors; therefore, the amounts reflected in this table do not represent additional compensation for services by Messrs. Murren and Baldwin as directors. On August 3, 2009, we entered into an employment agreement with Mr. Sanders that provides for a term through August 4, 2013 (with successive three-month automatic renewals, unless the agreement is otherwise terminated) and an annual base salary of $700,000. In September 2010, in connection with Mr. Sanders’ promotion to Chief Operating Officer of the Company, our Compensation Committee approved an increase to Mr. Sanders’ annual base salary on a sliding scale, to $800,000 in the first year, $850,000 in the second year, and $900,000 in theEmployment Agreements.


33


third year. On September 14, 2010, we entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Hornbuckle that replaces his prior agreement and provides for a term through September 13, 2013 (with successive three-month automatic renewals, unless the agreement is otherwise terminated) and an annual base salary of $1,100,000. Mr. Hornbuckle’s previous employment agreement, which was entered into on February 4, 2008 and effective as of April 2, 2008, and amended on January 1, 2009, provided for a term through April 1, 2012 and an annual base salary of $800,000 in the first year, $900,000 in the second year, and $1,000,000 in the third and fourth years. For Messrs. D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle, the amounts in this column do not reflect their full salaries at the end of 2010 because their respective salary increases became effective at times during 2010 and not at January 1, 2010.
(B)In 2011, in respect

For 2023, consists of their service in 2010, Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, SandersRSUs, Absolute TSR PSUs and Hornbuckle received discretionary bonuses of $750,000, $415,000, $300,000 and $340,000, respectively; these bonuses are reported inRelative TSR PSUs. The RSU awards vest ratably over the table as 2010 compensation. Pursuant to his new employment agreement, Mr. Baldwin was paid an additional cash bonus of $1,500,000 in 2010 for the completion of the CityCenter project, which is reported in the table as 2010 compensation. In 2010, in respect of their service in 2009, Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, and Sanders received discretionary bonuses of $500,000, $225,000, and $125,000, respectively; these bonuses are reported in the table as 2009 compensation where applicable.

(C)RSUs were granted to Messrs. Murren and D’Arrigo in 2010. The awards will be cancelled if certain performance criteria are not met during the 6 monthfour-year period beginning January 1, 2011. Atfollowing the grant date, we believed that it was probable that the performance criteria would be met and that each individual will remain employed through the date the grant would become fully vested by its terms, and accordingly, the full value of awards granted has been included. A detailed list of RSUs previously awarded to the Named Executives and still outstanding is shown in the table below under “Outstanding Equity Awards atFiscal-Year-End.”
(D)SARs were granted to all the Named Executives in 2010. A detailed list of stock options and SARs previously awarded to the Named Executives and still outstanding is shown in the table below under “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End.”date. There are no thresholds or maximums (or equivalent items). The amounts reflected in the table represent the grant date fair value for the Absolute TSR PSUs and the Relative TSR PSUs were computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. These awards were valued718 using a Monte Carlo simulation. Assuming the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions as described in Note 12 tohighest performance condition would be achieved, the Company’s consolidated financial statements, whichgrant date fair values of the Absolute TSR PSUs are included in$4.8 million, $1.3 million, $1.8 million, $1.8 million, and $1.1 million for Mr. Hornbuckle, Mr. Halkyard, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Fritz, and Mr. McManus, respectively. Assuming the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-Khighest performance condition would be achieved, the grant date fair values of the Relative TSR PSUs are $4.5 million, $1.2 million, $1.7 million, $1.7 million, and $1.0 million for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011.
(E)All of our Named Executives were eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan in 2010. The Incentive Plan provides for payments to be made at the Compensation Committee’s discretion if the Company achieves a certain level of a defined performance measure, generally based on EBITDA adjusted for certain items. Based on results related to the target EBITDA, Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin,Mr. Hornbuckle, Mr. Halkyard, Mr. Sanders, Mr. Fritz, and Hornbuckle were awarded $2,185,424, $204,884, $1,229,301, $382,449 and $491,720, respectively, under the Incentive Plan.Mr. McManus respectively. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis”Analysis—Long-Term Equity Incentives” for a further discussionmore information, including information relating to vesting and payouts.

(C)

Consists of the Incentive Plan. See also the “Grants of Plan-Based Awards” table for information about the performance-based grantscompensation earned under the Incentive Plan2023, 2022 and 2021 annual incentive program, including the value of Bonus dRSUs, as described in 2010. The $1,062,500 Additional Cash Award that vested March 31, 2010“Compensation Discussion and the $1,062,500 Additional Cash Award that vested September 30, 2010 are also reflected in this column for Mr. Murren.Analysis.”

(F)(D)

All other compensation for 2010 is composed2023 consists of the following:

                 
  Personal
 Insurance
    
  Use of
 Premiums
    
  Company
 and
 Other
 Total Other
Name
 Aircraft(1) Benefits(2) Perquisites(3) Compensation
 
Mr. Murren $374,514  $108,673  $102,087  $585,274 
Mr. D’Arrigo     26,443      26,443 
Mr. Baldwin     24,660   36,319   60,979 
Mr. Sanders  5,434   16,830      22,264 
Mr. Hornbuckle     33,893      33,893 

NAME

 PERSONAL
USE OF
COMPANY
AIRCRAFT(A)
 401(k)
MATCH
 INSURANCE
PREMIUMS
AND
BENEFITS(B)
 OTHER
PERQUISITES(C)
 TOTAL OTHER
COMPENSATION

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $206,319  $9,150  $12,277  $1,136  $228,882

Mr. Halkyard

   4,722   9,150   7,023      20,895

Mr. Sanders

      9,150   6,086   3,239   18,475

Mr. Fritz

               

Mr. McManus

      9,150   15,928      25,078


34


(A)
(1)

The amounts in this column represent the value of personal use of Companyour aircraft, which was determined based on the aggregate incremental cost to us of $374,514 and $5,434 for Messrs. Murren and Sanders, respectively.us. Aggregate incremental cost for all years shown was calculated based on average variable operating cost per flight hour multiplied by personal flight hours forattributable to each Named Executive,NEO, less any amounts reimbursed by such Named Executive.the NEO reimburses. The average variable operating cost per hour was calculated based on aggregate variable costs for each year, including fuel, engine reserves, trip-related repair and maintenance costs, travel expenses for flight crew, landing costs, related catering and miscellaneous handling charges, divided by the aggregate hours flown.

Fixed costs, such as flight crew salaries, wages and other employment costs, training, certain maintenance and inspections, depreciation, hangar rent, utilities, insurance and taxes are not included in aggregate incremental cost since these expenses are incurred by us irrespective of personal use of aircraft. The amount shown in the table for Mr. Murren reflects a reduction in the amount of $66,921 for his partial reimbursement to the Company for the incremental cost of his personal flights.

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

63


Compensation Tables

 
(2)(B)

The amounts in this column represent premiums and expenseother expenses for group life insurance, short term disability insurance, long term disability insurance, business travel insurance, and health plan coverage. In prior years, we included health plan coverage includinggross-upsthat was provided to all employees on a non-discriminatory basis but have begun excluding that this year given that it is not required to be included. The impact to prior years would have been a reduction in insurance premiums and benefits: for 2022 of associated taxes ($774, $98, $364$14,979, $8,067, $897, $0, and $438$15,855, for Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, BaldwinHornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders, Fritz, and McManus, respectively; and for 2021 $6,688, $0, $2,099, and $516 for Messrs. Hornbuckle, respectively),Halkyard, Sanders, and premiums for long term disability insurance for the benefit of the Named Executives.McManus, respectively.

 
(3)(C)In 2010, Mr. Murren received $100,000 to be applied to his life insurance premiums or such other uses as he determines. Also included

The amount reported in this column for Mr. Murren is $2,087 for in-town transportation expenses relating to the security protocol the Company provides for him. In 2010, Mr. Baldwin received $36,319 in legal services provided in connection with the negotiation of his employment agreement. As an owner and operator of full-service hotels, we are able to provide many perquisites relating to hotel and hotel-related services to the Named Executives at little or no additional cost to us. In no case did the value of such perquisites, computed based onHornbuckle reflects the incremental cost to us, exceed $10,000 per individual in 2010.the Company of providing Mr. Hornbuckle a car and driver for occasional personal use. The incremental cost for the car and driver was calculated using the 2023 IRS mileage rate, the personal use time and average chauffeur hourly rate. The variable cost rate is used rather than the standard business rate as the Company uses the car and driver for Company business, including to transport other passengers when not being used by Mr. Hornbuckle, and would incur the fixed costs of operating the vehicle and employing the driver. For Mr. Sanders, amount relates to reimbursements by the Company for state withholding taxes.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS

The table below sets forth certain information regardingshows plan-based awards granted during 20102023 to the Named Executives.

                                           
                      All Other
  All Other
       
                      Stock
  Option/SAR
       
             Estimated Number of
  Awards:
  Awards:
     Grant Date
 
             Shares For Future
  Number of
  Number of
  Exercise
  Fair Value
 
    Estimated Future Payouts Under
  Payouts Under Equity
  Shares of
  Securities
  Price of
  of Stock
 
    Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards (A)  Incentive Plan Awards(B)  Stock or
  Underlying
  Option/SAR
  Option/SAR
 
Name
 Grant Date Threshold  Target  Maximum  Threshold  Target  Maximum  Units  Options  Awards  Awards(C) 
 
James J. Murren N/A $2,000,000  $4,000,000  $6,000,000                             
  10/4/2010                 35,000         262,500  $11.36  $1,732,605 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo N/A  187,500   375,000   562,500                             
  10/4/2010                 5,000         37,500   11.36   247,515 
Robert H. Baldwin N/A  1,125,000   2,250,000   3,375,000                             
  12/13/2010                          750,000   13.18   5,745,000 
Corey I. Sanders N/A  350,000   700,000   1,050,000                             
  10/4/2010                          100,000   11.36   660,040 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV N/A  450,000   900,000   1,350,000                             
  10/4/2010                          75,000   11.36   495,030 
NEOs. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Annual Incentive Bonus” and “—Long-Term Equity Incentives” for a narrative description of these awards.

NAME

 GRANT
DATE
 

ESTIMATED FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER NON-EQUITY
INCENTIVE PLAN AWARDS(A)

 ESTIMATED NUMBER OF
SHARES FOR FUTURE PAYOUTS
UNDER EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS(B)
 

OTHER
STOCK
AWARDS:
NUMBER OF
TARGET

UNITS

 

GRANT
DATE
FAIR
VALUE
OF STOCK

AWARDS(B)

 

 

THRESHOLD

 

 

TARGET

 

 

MAXIMUM

 

 

THRESHOLD

 

 

TARGET

 

 

MAXIMUM

Mr. Hornbuckle

   N/A  $  $4,000,000  $8,000,000              $
   10/2/2023(C)                108,726           4,000,000
   10/2/2023(D)             52,911   88,185   141,096      3,000,000
    10/2/2023(E)             41,247   82,493   123,740      3,000,000

Mr. Halkyard

   N/A  $  $1,650,000  $3,300,000              $
   10/2/2023(C)                29,900         1,100,000
   10/2/2023(D)             14,551   24,251   38,802      825,000
    10/2/2023(E)             11,343   22,686   34,029      825,000

Mr. Sanders

   N/A  $  $2,187,500  $4,375,000              $
   10/2/2023(C)                40,772         1,500,000
   10/2/2023(D)             19,842   33,070   52,912      1,125,000
    10/2/2023(E)             15,468   30,935   46,403      1,125,000

Mr. Fritz

   N/A  $  $1,250,000  $2,500,000              $
   10/2/2023(C)                40,772         1,500,000
   10/2/2023(D)             19,842   33,070   52,912      1,125,000
    10/2/2023(E)             15,468   30,935   46,403      1,125,000

Mr. McManus

   N/A  $  $1,125,000  $2,250,000              $
   10/2/2023(C)                24,464         900,000
   10/2/2023(D)             11,905   19,842   31,747      675,000
    10/2/2023(E)             9,281   18,561   27,842      675,000

(A)The Compensation Committee approved the criteria for determining 2010 payouts under and the participants in the Incentive Plan in March 2010. Awards could be made if we achieved a minimum level of EBITDA, defined generally as consolidated EBITDA, excluding extraordinary items determined under GAAP, write-downs of long-lived assets, gains or losses from the sale of operating properties, EBITDA from operations of assets for the period prior to disposal, gains or losses on insurance proceeds relating to asset claims, gains or losses arising out of the acquisition, disposition, or exchanges of debt securities, or legal and advisory costs. The Compensation Committee set the target non-equity incentive awards under the Incentive Plan for 2010 as the following percentages of the participant’s salaries at January 1, 2010: 200%, 75%, 150%, 100%, and 100% for Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Baldwin, Sanders and Hornbuckle, respectively. For 2010, the target EBITDA


35


was set at $1,487,400,000 and actual EBITDA had to be at least 70% of target EBITDA or no bonus would have been payable. If actual EBITDA was 70% of target EBITDA, participants would be eligible to receive 50% of their target bonus. Thereafter, awards increase on a sliding scale up to a maximum amount of 150% of their target bonus. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis — Analysis—Elements of Compensation — Non-EquityCompensation—Annual Incentive Awards”Bonus” for details on the annual bonus program. Any portion of the annual incentive bonus earned by Messrs. Hornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders, Fritz, and McManus in 2023 in excess of 150% of such NEO’s target amounts definedbonus was paid in the Incentive Plan. The Compensation Committee retains full discretion to reduce or eliminate a payment under the Incentive Plan, even if the threshold orBonus dRSUs. Bonuses earned by our NEOs in 2023 did not exceed 150% of their respective target amounts set pursuant to the Incentive Plan are achieved.bonuses.

(B)For

See note (B) to the RSU awards to vest ratably over four years, our pre-tax incomeSummary Compensation Table above for the six months ending on June 30, 2011 must be at least 50% of the targeted EBITDA as determined in the budget adopted by the Board of Directors for such period, excluding certain predetermined items. There are no thresholds or maximums (or equivalent items).more information.

(C)Represents the fair value of the SARs granted on their respective grant dates. The fair value is calculated in accordance with FASB ASC 718 using the Black-Scholes valuation model. For additional information, refer to Note 12 of the Company’s consolidated financial statements, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011. There can be no assurance that these amounts will correspond to the actual value that will be recognized by the Named Executives.

RSU award.

(D)

Absolute TSR PSU award.

(E)

Relative TSR PSU award.

64 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End

Compensation Tables

OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT FISCAL YEAR-END

The table below sets forth certain information regardingshows outstanding equity awards of the Named Executives atNEOs as of December 31, 2010.

                                 
  Option Awards Stock Awards
              Equity
  
              Incentive
  
              Plan
  
              Awards:
  
              Number of
  
              Unearned
  
  Number of
 Number of
       Market
 Shares,
 Equity Incentive
  Securities
 Securities
     Number of
 Value of
 Units or
 Plan Awards:
  Underlying
 Underlying
     Shares or
 Shares or
 other
 Market or Payout
  Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Option/
 Option/
 Units of Stock
 Units of
 Rights
 Value of Unearned
  Options/
 Options/SARS
 SAR
 SAR
 that Have
 Stock
 That Have Not
 Shares, units or
  SARS
 Unexercisable
 Exercise
 Expiration
 Not Vested
 that Have Not
 Vested
 Other Rights That
Name
 Exercisable (A) Price Date (B) Vested (B) Have Not Vested
 
James J. Murren  600,000(1)    $34.05   5/3/2012                 
   100,000(1)     34.36   5/10/2012                 
   1,000,000(1)     12.74   2/27/2013                 
   93,750(2)  93,750   19.00   10/6/2015                 
   375,000(2)  1,625,000   5.53   4/6/2016                 
   (2)  262,500   11.36   10/4/2017                 
                           35,000  $519,750 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  9,000(1)    $17.08   8/5/2011                 
   100,000(1)     34.05   5/3/2012                 
   50,000(1)     17.40   9/2/2012                 
   35,000(1)     12.74   2/27/2013                 
   15,000(2)  15,000   19.00   10/6/2015                 
   8,250(2)  24,750   11.54   10/5/2016                 
   (2)  37,500   11.36   10/4/2017                 
                   6,942  $103,089         
                           3,300  $49,005 
                           5,000  $74,250 


36

2023.

  OPTION/SAR AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
  NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS/SARS
 OPTION/
SAR
EXERCISE
PRICE
 OPTION/
SAR
EXPIRATION
DATE
 SHARES OR UNITS
OF STOCK THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
UNEARNED SHARES,
UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT VESTED

NAME

 EXERCISABLE UN-EXERCISABLE NUMBER VALUE NUMBER VALUE

Mr. Hornbuckle

        $      11,259(A)   $503,052     $
               38,213(B)    1,707,357      
               35,959(C)    1,606,648      
               98,014(D)    4,379,266      
               108,726(E)    4,857,878      
                     51,287(F)    1,810,300
                     47,051(G)    2,102,239
                     93,677(H)    4,101,758
                     88,048(I)    5,683,430
                     88,185(J)    3,073,269
                      82,493(K)    2,280,780

Mr. Halkyard

        $      15,381(L)   $687,223     $
               26,953(D)    1,204,260      
               29,900(E)    1,335,932      
                     9,616(F)    339,434
                     8,822(G)    394,167
                     25,761(H)    1,127,991
                     24,213(I)    1,562,951
                     24,251(J)    845,167
                      22,686(K)    627,218

Mr. Sanders

        $      8,856(A)   $395,686     $
               20,300(B)    907,004      
               17,686(C)    790,210      
               36,755(D)    1,642,213      
               40,772(E)    1,821,693      
                     25,226(F)    890,428
                     23,143(G)    1,034,029
                     35,129(H)    1,538,154
                     33,018(I)    2,131,281
                     33,070(J)    1,152,521
                      30,935(K)    855,309

Mr. Fritz

        $      30,010(M)   $1,340,847     $
               36,755(D)    1,642,213      
               40,772(E)    1,821,693      
                     32,511(N)    1,045,869
                     32,511(O)    1,130,136
                     35,129(H)    1,538,154
                     33,018(I)    2,131,281
                     33,070(J)    1,152,521
                      30,935(K)    855,309

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

65


Compensation Tables

                                 
  Option Awards Stock Awards
              Equity
  
              Incentive
  
              Plan
  
              Awards:
  
              Number of
  
              Unearned
  
  Number of
 Number of
       Market
 Shares,
 Equity Incentive
  Securities
 Securities
     Number of
 Value of
 Units or
 Plan Awards:
  Underlying
 Underlying
     Shares or
 Shares or
 other
 Market or Payout
  Unexercised
 Unexercised
 Option/
 Option/
 Units of Stock
 Units of
 Rights
 Value of Unearned
  Options/
 Options/SARS
 SAR
 SAR
 that Have
 Stock
 That Have Not
 Shares, units or
  SARS
 Unexercisable
 Exercise
 Expiration
 Not Vested
 that Have Not
 Vested
 Other Rights That
Name
 Exercisable (A) Price Date (B) Vested (B) Have Not Vested
 
Robert H. Baldwin  600,000(1)    $34.05   5/3/2012                 
   567,187(1)     12.74   2/27/2013                 
   93,750(2)  93,750   19.00   10/6/2015                 
   46,875(2)  140,625   11.54   10/5/2016                 
   (2)  750,000   13.18   12/13/2017                 
                           18,750  $278,438 
Corey I. Sanders  160,000(1)    $34.05   5/3/2012                 
   70,000(1)     12.74   2/27/2013                 
   15,000(2)  15,000   19.00   10/6/2015                 
   100,000(2)  300,000   7.45   8/3/2016                 
   (2)  100,000   11.36   10/4/2017                 
                   1,500  $22,275         
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  235,000(1)    $34.05   5/3/2012                 
   18,750(2)  18,750   19.00   10/6/2015                 
   56,250(2)  168,750   7.45   8/3/2016                 
   (2)  75,000   11.36   10/4/2017                 
                   1,875  $27,844         
                   15,642  $232,284         

  OPTION/SAR AWARDS STOCK AWARDS
  NUMBER OF SECURITIES
UNDERLYING UNEXERCISED
OPTIONS/SARS
 OPTION/
SAR
EXERCISE
PRICE
 OPTION/
SAR
EXPIRATION
DATE
 SHARES OR UNITS
OF STOCK THAT HAVE
NOT VESTED
 EQUITY INCENTIVE
PLAN AWARDS:
UNEARNED SHARES,
UNITS OR OTHER
RIGHTS THAT
HAVE NOT VESTED

NAME

 EXERCISABLE UN-EXERCISABLE NUMBER VALUE NUMBER VALUE

Mr. McManus

        $      6,529(A)   $291,716     $
               8,359(B)    373,480      
                 7,866(C)    351,453      
                 22,054(D)    985,373      
                 24,464(E)    1,093,052      
                       11,218(F)    395,954
                       10,292(G)    459,847
                       21,077(H)    922,865
                       19,811(I)    1,278,786
                       19,842(J)    691,512
                        18,561(K)    513,194

(A)
(1)Non-qualified stock option award. In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, (i) if the employment of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin is terminated under his employment agreement by us for no cause or by him for good cause, the non-qualified stock options shall remain exercisable during his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination) and thereafter for the period provided for under the applicable stock option agreement, but in no event shall such exercise period exceed the expiration of the original term of any such stock option, and (ii) if the employment of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle is terminated under his employment agreement by us for no cause, the non-qualified stock options shall remain exercisable during the shorter of 12 months or his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination) and thereafter for the period provided for under the applicable stock option agreement, but in no event shall such exercise period exceed the expiration of the original term of any such stock option.

RSU award scheduled to vest on 4/1/24.

37


(B)
(2)SAR award.
(A) Outstanding unexercisable options/SARs vest as follows:
                 
  Unexercised
  Option/SAR
  Option/SAR
    
  Options/SARs
  Exercise
  Expiration
    
Underlying Name
 Unexercisable  Price  Date  Vesting 
 
James J. Murren  93,750  $19.00   10/6/2015   46,875 vest 10/6/2011;(1)
               46,875 vest 10/6/2012(1)
   1,625,000   5.53   4/6/2016   625,000 vest 4/6/2011;(2)
               500,000 vest 4/6/2012; 
               500,000 vest 4/6/2013 
   262,500   11.36   10/4/2017   65,625 vest 10/4/2011;(3)
               65,625 vest 10/4/2012;(3)
               65,625 vest 10/4/2013;(3)
               65,625 vest 10/4/2014(3)
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  15,000  $19.00   10/6/2015   7,500 vest 10/6/2011; 
               7,500 vest 10/6/2012 
   24,750   11.54   10/5/2016   8,250 vest 10/5/2011; 
               8,250 vest 10/5/2012; 
               8,250 vest 10/5/2013 
   37,500   11.36   10/4/2017   9,375 vest 10/4/2011; 
               9,375 vest 10/4/2012; 
               9,375 vest 10/4/2013; 
               9,375 vest 10/4/2014 
Robert H. Baldwin  93,750  $19.00   10/6/2015   46,875 vest 10/6/2011;(1)
               46,875 vest 10/6/2012(1)
   140,625   11.54   10/5/2016   46,875 vest 10/5/2011;(1)
               46,875 vest 10/5/2012;(1)
               46,875 vest 10/5/2013(1)
   750,000   13.18   12/13/2017   187,500 vest 12/13/2011; 
               187,500 vest 12/13/2012; 
               187,500 vest 12/13/2013; 
               187,500 vest 12/13/2014 


38


                 
  Unexercised
  Option/SAR
  Option/SAR
    
  Options/SARs
  Exercise
  Expiration
    
Underlying Name
 Unexercisable  Price  Date  Vesting 
 
Corey I. Sanders  15,000  $19.00   10/6/2015   7,500 vest 10/6/2011;(4)
               7,500 vest 10/6/2012(4)
   300,000   7.45   8/3/2016   100,000 vest 8/3/2011; 
               100,000 vest 8/3/2012; 
               100,000 vest 8/3/2013 
   100,000   11.36   10/4/2017   25,000 vest 10/4/2011; 
               25,000 vest 10/4/2012; 
               25,000 vest 10/4/2013; 
               25,000 vest 10/4/2014 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  18,750  $19.00   10/6/2015   9,375 vest 10/6/2011;(4)
               9,375 vest 10/6/2012(4)
   168,750   7.45   8/3/2016   56,250 vest 8/3/2011;(4)
               56,250 vest 8/3/2012;(4)
               56,250 vest 8/3/2013(4)
   75,000   11.36   10/4/2017   18,750 vest 10/4/2011; 
               18,750 vest 10/4/2012; 
               18,750 vest 10/4/2013; 
               18,750 vest 10/4/2014 
(1)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin is terminated under his employment agreement (i) as a result of death or disability, SARs which would have vested as of the first anniversary of the date of termination will vest and become exercisable in accordance with their terms and (ii) by us for no cause or by him for good cause, SARs will continue

RSU award scheduled to vest on 8/18/24.

(C)

RSU award scheduled to vest in equal installments on each of 10/4/24 and be exercisable (to the extent vested) during his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action10/4/25.

(D)

RSU award scheduled to vest in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expirationequal installments on each of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as10/3/24, 10/3/25, and 10/3/26.

(E)

RSU award scheduled to vest in effect asequal installments on each of the applicable date of determination)10/2/24, 10/2/25, 10/2/26 and thereafter shall remain exercisable for the period provided for under the applicable SAR agreement, but in no event shall such exercise period exceed the expiration of the original term of any such SAR. Upon a change of control the SARs will immediately10/2/27.

(F)

Absolute TSR PSU award scheduled to vest and may,on 10/4/24 subject to the typelevel of the change of control, become exercisable for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or be cashed out.

(2)500,000 of the granted SARs vest ratably over four years from the date of grant, subject to the average closing price of the Company’s Common Stock being at least $17 during any 20 consecutive trading day period prior to the earlier of (i) April 6, 2013, (ii) if Mr. Murren’s employment is terminated prior to April 6, 2013, the date of such termination or the end of any post-termination vesting period, if any, as applicable, or (iii) the occurrence of certain other events specified in his SARs agreement. For purposes of this table, it was assumed that the price-based vesting criteria stated above for the 500,000 SARs granted April 6, 2009 will be met during the year ended December 31, 2011. Therefore, the tranches that would have vested April 6, 2010 and 2011 were assumed to become vested during 2011.
(3)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, (i) if the employment of Mr. Murren is terminated as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, the SARs will remain eligible to vest until the earlier of (x) the date that is two years following such termination (except that in the case of disability the two-year period is measured from the onset of disability), (y) the date of a violation of the restrictive covenants contained in his employment agreement or (z) October 4, 2014 and (ii) if the employment of Mr. Murren is terminated as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, in each case, on or before the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, the SARs will remain eligible

39


to be exercised (to the extent vested) until the earlier of (x) the date that is two years and ninety days following such termination (except that in the case of disability the two-year and ninety day period is measured from the onset of disability), (y) ninety days following the date of a violation of the restrictive covenants contained in his employment agreement or (z) the expiration date of the SARs; provided that if his employment terminates for any reason following the fourth anniversary of the date of grant, the SARs will remain eligible to be exercised (to the extent vested) until the earlier of ninety days following such termination or the expiration date of such SARs. Upon a change of control, subject to the ability of the Compensation Committee to accelerate the vesting of the SARs, the grant would continue to vest in accordance with its terms and become exercisable (upon vesting) for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control.
(4)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Messrs. Sanders or Hornbuckle is terminated under his employment agreement (i) by us for no cause, the SARs will continue to vest and be exercisable (to the extent vested) during the shorter of 12 months or his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination) and thereafter shall remain exercisable for the period provided for under the applicable SAR agreement, but in no event shall such exercise periods exceed the expiration of the original term of any such SAR or (ii) as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, in each case, on or prior to the first anniversary of a change of control, any SARs which would have vested during the shorter of 12 months following such termination or the remainder of the specified term of his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, the specified term of such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination) shall immediately vest and (x) with respect to Mr. Sanders, may, subject to the type of the change of control, become exercisable for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or cash and (y) with respect to Mr. Hornbuckle, may, subject to the type of the change of control, become exercisable for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or be cashed out within 30 days following such change of control.


40


(B)Outstanding unvested RSUs vest as follows:
                 
        Equity Incentive Plan
    
        Awards: Number of
    
  Number of Shares or
     Unearned Shares, Units    
  Units of Stock that
     or Other Rights That
    
Underlying Name
 Have Not Vested  Vesting  Have Not Vested  Vesting 
 
James J. Murren          35,000   8,750 vest 10/4/2011;(1)
               8,750 vest 10/4/2012;(1)
               8,750 vest 10/4/2013;(1)
               8,750 vest 10/4/2014(1)
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  6,942   3,471 vest 9/10/2011;         
       3,471 vest 9/10/2012         
           3,300   1,100 vest 10/5/2011; 
               1,100 vest 10/5/2012; 
               1,100 vest 10/5/2013 
           5,000   1,250 vest 10/4/2011; 
               1,250 vest 10/4/2012; 
               1,250 vest 10/4/2013; 
               1,250 vest 10/4/2014 
Robert H. Baldwin          18,750   6,250 vest 10/5/2011;(2)
               6,250 vest 10/5/2012;(2)
               6,250 vest 10/5/2013(2)
Corey I. Sanders  1,500   750 vest 10/6/2011;(3)        
       750 vest 10/6/2012(3)        
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  1,875   937 vest 10/6/2011;(4)        
       938 vest 10/6/2012(4)        
   15,642   5,214 vest 2/4/2011;(4)        
       5,214 vest 2/4/2012;(4)        
       5,214 vest 2/4/2013(4)        
(1)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Mr. Murren under his employment agreement is terminated as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, subject to satisfactionachievement of the applicable performance criteria, the RSUs which would have vested as of the date that is two years following such termination (except that in the case of disability the two-year period is measured from the onset of disability) shallcriteria.

(G)

Relative TSR PSU award scheduled to vest on the later of the date of such termination or, if still eligible, the date of the satisfaction of the performance criteria, subject to a potential clawback of all or a portion of such accelerated RSUs in the event of his breach of the restrictive covenants in his employment agreement. Upon a change of control,10/4/24 subject to the abilitylevel of achievement of the Compensation Committeeapplicable performance criteria.

(H)

Absolute TSR PSU award scheduled to acceleratevest on 10/3/25 subject to the vestinglevel of achievement of the RSUs,applicable performance criteria.

(I)

Relative TSR PSU award scheduled to vest on 10/3/25 subject to the grant would continuelevel of achievement of the applicable performance criteria.

(J)

Absolute TSR PSU award scheduled to vest on 10/2/26 subject to the level of achievement of the applicable performance criteria.

(K)

Relative TSR PSU award scheduled to vest on 10/2/26 subject to the level of achievement of the applicable performance criteria.

(L)

RSU award scheduled to vest in accordance with its termsequal installments on each of 2/1/24 and at the time2/1/25.

(M)

RSU award scheduled to vest in equal installments on each of vesting, receive the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control.12/1/24, and 12/1/25.

(2)(N)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Mr. Baldwin under his employment agreement is terminated as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, he will receive acceleration of vesting of one additional tranche of RSUs. Upon a change of control, the RSUs shall immediately

Absolute TSR PSU award scheduled to vest and may,on 12/1/24 subject to the typelevel of achievement of the change of control, be settled for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or cash.applicable performance criteria.

(3)(O)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Mr. Sanders under his employment agreement is terminated (i) by us for no cause, he will receive acceleration of vesting of one additional tranche of RSUs, or (ii) as a result of death, disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, in each case,

Relative TSR PSU award scheduled to vest on or prior to the first anniversary of a change of control he will receive acceleration of vesting of one additional tranche of RSUs and such RSUs may,12/1/24 subject to the typelevel of the change of control, be settled for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or cash.

(4)In accordance with certain actions taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, if the employment of Mr. Hornbuckle under his employment agreement is terminated (i) by us for no cause, the RSUs will remain eligible to vest for the shorter of 12 months or the remaining period of the specified term (as defined under his employment agreement in effect asachievement of the applicable date of determination) and (ii) as a result of death,performance criteria.


41

OPTION/SAR EXERCISES AND STOCK VESTED


disability, by us for no cause or by him for good cause, in each case, on or prior to the first anniversary of a change of control, any RSUs which would have vested during the shorter of 12 months following such termination or the remainder of the specified term (as defined under his employment agreement in effect as of the applicable date of determination) shall immediately vest and may, subject to the type of the change of control, be settled for the consideration received by our holders of Common Stock in connection with the change of control or be cashed out.
Option/SAR Exercises and Stock Vested
The following table sets forth option/SAR exercisesshows RSU and RSUPSU vesting for the Named ExecutivesNEOs during 2010.
                 
  Stock Option/SAR Awards Stock Awards
  Number of
   Number of
  
  Shares
 Value
 Shares
 Value
  Acquired on
 Realized
 Acquired
 Realized
Name
 Exercise (#) on Exercise ($) on Vesting (#) on Vesting ($)
 
James J. Murren    $     $ 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo        3,361   35,861 
Robert H. Baldwin        3,971   46,500 
Corey I. Sanders        551   6,403 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV        4,309   47,066 
2023. For option/SAR awards,RSUs and PSUs, the value realized is computedcalculated as the difference betweennumber of shares vested times the marketclosing share price on the date of exerciseapplicable vesting date.

  STOCK AWARDS (RSUs) STOCK AWARDS

NAME

 NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
VESTING
 VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING
 NUMBER OF
SHARES
ACQUIRED ON
VESTING
 VALUE
REALIZED ON
VESTING

Mr. Hornbuckle

   140,244  $4,497,489   297,765  $12,666,928

Mr. Halkyard

   32,281   767,255      

Mr. Sanders

   57,155   2,301,664   158,187   6,729,265

Mr. Fritz

   27,257   1,050,464      

Mr. McManus

   26,410   1,056,669   65,136   2,770,866

For Messrs. Hornbuckle, and the exercise price, timesHalkyard, the number of options/SARs exercised.shares acquired on vesting related to Stock Awards (RSUs) includes 26,733, and 12,695 Bonus dRSUs, respectively. These Bonus dRSUs were granted during 2023 and were fully vested on

66 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Nonqualified Deferred

Compensation

Tables

the grant date, but the settlement and receipt of shares has been deferred and will be paid in four equal installments over a four-year period following the grant date. Because no value was realized, and no shares were acquired, upon vesting of these Bonus dRSUs, no value is reflected for these awards in the table above. As of the grant date, the value of each executive’s Bonus dRSU award (not including the value of any DEUs credited following the grant date) was equal to (i) the number of Bonus dRSUs granted multiplied by (ii) $43.15, the price of our common stock on the grant date.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION

The following table sets forth information regardingshows nonqualified deferred compensation to the NEOs in 2023 under the DCP. See “Compensation Discussion and Analysis—Elements of Compensation—Deferred Compensation Opportunities” for a narrative description of the Named Executives during 2010.

                     
           Aggregate
  Aggregate
 
  Executive
  Company
  Aggregate
  Withdrawals/
  Balance at
 
Name
 Contributions  Contributions  Earnings(A)  Distributions  Year-End 
 
Deferred Compensation Plan (“DCP”)(B)
                    
James J. Murren $  $  $7,525  $  $72,972 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo        887      14,731 
Robert H. Baldwin               
Corey I. Sanders              13,511 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV        3,601      30,665 
                     
Grand Total $  $  $12,013  $  $131,879 
                     
DCP.

NAME

  

EXECUTIVE

CONTRIBUTIONS

IN THE LAST

FISCAL YEAR

  

COMPANY

CONTRIBUTIONS

IN THE LAST

FISCAL YEAR

  

AGGREGATE

EARNINGS IN

THE LAST

FISCAL YEAR(A)

  

AGGREGATE

WITHDRAWALS/

DISTRIBUTIONS

  

AGGREGATE

BALANCE

AT YEAR

END

Mr. Hornbuckle

   $78,534   $   $11,027   $   $89,561

Mr. Halkyard

                    

Mr. Sanders

                    

Mr. Fritz

                    

Mr. McManus

                    

Total

   $78,534   $   $11,027   $   $89,561

(A)

None of these amounts were included as “Change in Pension Value and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Earnings” in the Summary Compensation Table.


42

ESTIMATED BENEFITS UPON TERMINATION


(B)No contributions have been made by the Company to the DCP or SERP plans during 2009 or 2010. The following amounts were included in the Summary Compensation Table in previous years during which the employee was a Named Executive:
             
  DCP Company
 SERP Company
 Total
Name
 Contributions Contributions Contributions
 
James J. Murren $465,450  $1,556,993  $2,022,443 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  33,750   113,472   147,222 
Robert H. Baldwin  449,450   2,843,022   3,292,472 
Corey I. Sanders         
William J. Hornbuckle, IV         
Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control
Termination by the Company for Good Cause
We may terminate the employment of our Named Executives under any of our employment agreements with them for good cause (as defined in their respective employment agreements), including termination for death or disability (as defined in their respective employment agreements).
If the employment of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin is terminated by the Company for good cause, he will be entitled to the following under his current employment agreement: (i) salary through the date of termination (to the extent unpaid); (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined in accordance with the bonus plan, including the exercise of discretion which may reduce or eliminate such bonus); (iii) with respect to the SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, the right to exercise such SARs, to the extent vested, generally for 90 days after termination; and (iv) business or travel expense reimbursements accrued but unpaid as of the date of termination. Any other equity awards granted to Messrs. Murren or Baldwin are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Mr. Murren would also remain entitled to receive certain Additional Cash Awards provided for in his employment agreement which are vested but unpaid.
If the employment of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle is terminated by the Company for good cause (other than as a result of death or disability), he will be entitled under his employment agreement to exercise, in accordance with their terms, his vested but unexercised stock options, SARs and other stock-based compensation awards that were granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement (any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
If a Named Executive is terminated by the Company for good cause, the Company will have no further obligation to the Named Executive under his employment agreement other than the foregoing applicable obligations or as required by applicable law.
Death or Disability
If the employment of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin is terminated under his employment agreement by the Company as a result of death or disability, he (or his beneficiaries) will be entitled to receive the following under his employment agreement: (i) his salary through the date of death or disability (to the extent unpaid) and for a12-month period following such termination (net of any applicable payments received from any short-term disability policy); (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined through the application of the applicable bonus formula on a non-discretionary basis, except to the extent all executives who participate in the same bonus arrangement as the Named Executive are treated in an identical fashion with respect to such bonus); (iii) a prorated portion of any bonus attributable to the fiscal year in which the death or disability occurs (determined through the application of the applicable bonus formula on a non-discretionary basis, except to the extent all executives who participate in the same bonus arrangement as the Named


43


Executive are treated in an identical fashion with respect to such bonus); (iv) continuation of health and insurance benefits for the Named Executive and his dependents for up to four years following termination (or a cash payment in respect thereof if the Company is unable to provide such continued coverage), subject to certain conditions and limitations; and (v) business or travel expense reimbursements accrued but unpaid as of the date of termination. With respect to any SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and, as a result of action taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, he will generally receive a two-year extension to the vesting period and atwo-year-and-90-day extension to the exercise period. Any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Mr. Murren would also receive or remain entitled to receive Additional Cash Awards provided for in his employment agreement that are vested but unpaid.
If the employment of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle is terminated under his employment agreement by the Company as a result of death or disability, he (or his beneficiaries) will be entitled under his employment agreement to receive his salary for a three-month period following his termination (net of any applicable payments received from any short-term disability policy), and to exercise his vested but unexercised stock options, SARs or other stock-based compensation awards, in each case, granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of the Named Executive’s current employment agreement, in accordance with their terms (any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
If a Named Executive is terminated by the Company as a result of death or disability, the Company will have no further obligation to the Named Executive under his employment agreement other than the foregoing applicable obligations or as required by applicable law.
Termination by the Company for Other than Good Cause
If the employment of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin is terminated under his employment agreement by the Company for other than good cause, death or disability, then we will treat him as an inactive employee during the12-month period during which he is restricted from working for or otherwise providing services to a competitor of ours, and he will be entitled to receive the following under his employment agreement: (i) salary through the date of termination (to the extent unpaid) and for a12-month period following termination; (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined through the application of the applicable bonus formula on a non-discretionary basis, except to the extent all executives who participate in the same bonus arrangement as the Named Executive are treated in an identical fashion with respect to such bonus); (iii) a lump-sum payment equal to the excess of $7,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Murren) or $4,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Baldwin) over the continued salary paid for the12-month period; (iv) continuation of health and insurance benefits for the Named Executive and his dependents for up to four years following termination (or a cash payment in respect thereof if the Company is unable to provide such continued coverage), subject to certain conditions and limitations; and (v) business or travel expense reimbursements accrued but unpaid as of the date of termination. With respect to any SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and, as a result of action taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, he will generally receive a two-year extension to the vesting period and atwo-year-and-90-day extension to the exercise period. Any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Mr. Murren would also remain entitled to receive Additional Cash Awards provided for in his employment agreement that are vested and unpaid. However, neither Mr. Murren nor Mr. Baldwin will be entitled to any pro-rated bonus for the year in which the termination occurs, nor will he be eligible for flex or vacation time, discretionary bonus, new equity grants, or any other compensation or benefits except as previously described.
If the employment of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle is terminated under his employment agreement by the Company for other than good cause, then, under his employment agreement, we will treat


44


him as an inactive employee through the remaining term of his agreement, pay his salary for the remaining term of the agreement and maintain him as a participant in all health and insurance programs in which he and his dependents (if applicable) are then participating until the end of the remaining term of his agreement or until the first date he becomes eligible for those benefits from a new employer. None of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle will be eligible for flex or vacation time, a discretionary bonus or new equity grants; however, as a result of action taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, (i) stock options and SARs granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement will continue to vest and be exercisable (to the extent vested) during the shorter of 12 months or his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination) and thereafter shall remain exercisable for the period provided for under the applicable stock option or SAR agreement, but in no event shall such exercise periods exceed the expiration of the original term of any such stock option or SAR and (ii) other stock-based compensation awards granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement will continue to vest for the shorter of 12 months or his inactive status period under his employment agreement (or, after Compensation Committee action in 2011, if such termination occurs following the expiration of his current employment agreement, any inactive status period under such employment agreement as in effect as of the applicable date of determination). Any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
Notwithstanding the foregoing, while on inactive status a Named Executive may work for or otherwise provide services to a non-competitor (as defined in the applicable employment agreement), in which case all compensation paid by us during the remaining term of such Named Executive’s employment agreement is subject to offset (subject, in the case of Messrs. Murren and Baldwin, to a cap).
If a Named Executive is terminated by the Company other than for good cause, the Company will have no further obligation to the Named Executive under his employment agreement other than the foregoing applicable obligations or as required by applicable law.
Termination by Named Executive for Good Cause
If Messrs. Murren or Baldwin seeks to terminate his employment under his employment agreement for good cause, he must give us 30 days prior notice to cure the alleged breach. If such breach is not cured (and we do not invoke our right to arbitration), the termination will be treated as a termination other than for good cause by us as described in the preceding paragraph. However, if we invoke our arbitration right, the Named Executive must continue to work until the matter is resolved (otherwise a termination by him without good cause would be deemed to occur). If Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle seeks to terminate his employment under his employment agreement for good cause, he must give us 30 days prior notice to cure the alleged breach or dispute the fact that good cause exists, in which case the dispute will be resolved by arbitration and the agreement will continue in full force until the matter is resolved. If the agreement is terminated by any of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle for good cause, he will be entitled under his employment agreement to exercise his vested but unexercised stock options, SARs and other stock-based compensation awards, in each case, granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement, in accordance with their terms (any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
If a Named Executive is terminated by the Company other than for good cause, the Company will have no further obligation to the Named Executive under his employment agreement other than the foregoing applicable obligations or as required by applicable law.


45


Termination by Named Executive Without Good Cause
If Messrs. Murren or Baldwin terminates his employment with us under his employment agreement without cause, he would be entitled to the following under his employment agreement: (i) his salary through the date of termination (to the extent unpaid); (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined in accordance with the bonus plan, including the exercise of discretion which may reduce or eliminate such bonus); (iii) with respect to any SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, the right to exercise any such SARs, to the extent vested, generally for 90 days after termination; and (iv) business or travel expense reimbursements accrued but unpaid as of the date of termination. Any other equity awards granted to Messrs. Murren or Baldwin are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Mr. Murren would also remain entitled to receive certain Additional Cash Awards provided for in Mr. Murren’s employment agreement that are vested but unpaid. However, neither of Mr. Murren nor Mr. Baldwin would be entitled to any pro-rated bonus for the year in which the termination occurs.
If Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle terminates his employment under his employment agreement without good cause, then under his employment agreement he will be entitled to his salary through the date of termination (to the extent unpaid), and he will be entitled to exercise his vested but unexercised stock options, SARs or other stock-based compensation awards, in each case, granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement, in accordance with their terms (any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement and any special termination protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
If a Named Executive terminates his employment under his employment agreement without good cause, then the Company will have no further obligation to the Named Executive under his employment agreement other than the foregoing applicable obligations or as required by applicable law, and the Company will be entitled to all available rights and remedies by reason of such termination, including any available right to enforce restrictive covenants binding the Named Executive and any available right to recover damages.
Change of Control
If there is a change of control of the Company (as defined in the applicable Named Executive’s employment agreement):
• Messrs. Murren or Baldwin may terminate his employment under his employment agreement upon delivery of 30 days prior notice to the Company (which notice may be given prior to the change of control conditional upon the occurrence of the change of control), no later than 90 days following the date of the change of control. In such event, Messrs. Murren or Baldwin will be entitled to the following under his employment agreement: (i) a lump sum amount equal to $7,000,000 (for Mr. Murren) or $4,000,000 (for Mr. Baldwin); provided that if the change of control is not a Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code change in control event (as defined in his employment agreement), Messrs. Murren and Baldwin are not entitled to the foregoing $7,000,000 and $4,000,000 payments, respectively, and instead, he would receive his salary through the date of termination (to the extent unpaid) and for a12-month period following termination plus a lump-sum payment equal to the excess of $7,000,000 (for Mr. Murren) or $4,000,000 (for Mr. Baldwin) over the continued salary paid for the12-month period ); (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined through the application of the applicable bonus formula on a non-discretionary basis, except to the extent all executives who participate in the same bonus arrangement as the Named Executive are treated in an identical fashion with respect to such bonus); (iii) continuation of health and insurance benefits for Messrs. Murren or Baldwin and his dependents for up to four years following termination (or a cash payment in respect thereof if the Company is unable to provide such continued coverage), subject to certain conditions and limitations; (iv) with respect to any SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and, as a result of action taken by our Compensation Committee in 2011, Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, he will generally receive acceleration in full of all time-based


46


vesting of SARs, a two-year extension to any price-based vesting period for SARs and atwo-year-and-90-day extension to the exercise period for such SARs; provided that to the extent the change of control is a “discontinuing change of control,” as defined in his SARs agreement, vested SARs (including, vesting which occurs as a result of the “discontinuing change of control”) shall be purchased by the Compensation Committee for either cash, securities or other property; and (v) business or travel expense reimbursements accrued but unpaid as of the date of termination. Any other equity awards granted to Messrs. Murren or Baldwin are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special change of control protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Mr. Murren would also remain eligible to receive certain Additional Cash Awards provided for in his employment agreement which are vested and unpaid. Neither Mr. Murren nor Mr. Baldwin will be entitled to any pro-rated bonus for the year in which the termination occurs. If any payments or benefits payable to Messrs. Murren or Baldwin pursuant to the terms of his employment agreement or otherwise in connection with, or arising out of, his employment with the Company on a change in ownership or control (within the meaning of Section 280G of the Internal Revenue Code) would be subject to the excise tax imposed by Section 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code, the payments and benefits for Messrs. Murren or Baldwin will be reduced to the maximum amount such that no portion of the payments and benefits would be subject to the excise tax only if, following such reduction, Messrs. Murren or Baldwin would retain a greater amount of such payments and benefits than if no reduction had occurred and Messrs. Murren or Baldwin paid any applicable excise tax.
• Mr. D’Arrigo’s unvested stock options, SARs and other stock-based compensation awards granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement will fully vest (provided that vesting for any restricted stock units which are deferred compensation (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) will only accelerate if the change of control is a change in control event as described in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code) and may, subject to the type of change of control of the Company, become exercisable for the consideration received by holders of Company Common Stock in such transaction or be cashed out. In addition, if Mr. D’Arrigo’s employment under his employment agreement is terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company, depending on the reason for such termination, he may be entitled to the severance benefits previously described. Any other equity awards granted to Mr. D’Arrigo are generally unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement (and any special change of control protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above).
• If the employment of Messrs. Sanders or Hornbuckle under their employment agreements is terminated on or prior to the first anniversary of a change of control by us as a result of death, disability or other than for good cause, or by Messrs. Sanders or Hornbuckle for good cause, his unvested stock options, SARs and other stock-based compensation awards granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of his current employment agreement that would have vested during the shorter of (a) 12 months following termination (had he remained employed) or (b) the remaining term of his employment agreement, shall fully vest and become exercisable (any other equity awards granted to him are unaffected by the terms of his current employment agreement and any special change of control protections applicable to such awards, if any, are set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above). Depending on the type of change of control of the Company, stock options, SARs and other stock-based compensation awards granted contemporaneously with or after the execution of the current employment agreement for Messrs. Sanders or Hornbuckle may become exercisable, in each case, upon vesting, for the consideration received by holders of Company Common Stock in connection with such transaction or be cashed out. In addition, if the employment of Messrs. Sanders or Hornbuckle under his employment agreement is terminated in connection with a change of control of the Company, depending on the reason for such termination, he may also be entitled to the severance benefits previously described.
Obligations of the Named Executives
Obligations of the Named Executives under the employment agreements relating to confidentiality, providing services to competitors and others, and soliciting customers and Company employees continue after termination of


47


employment, regardless of the reason for such termination. With the exception of obligations relating to confidentiality, which are not limited by time, these restrictions generally continue for the12-month period following termination (or for such period that remains in the term of the agreement if less than 12 months). However, if Messrs. Murren or Baldwin invokes his right to terminate his employment under his employment agreement upon a change of control of the Company, he will be released from certain of these restrictions regarding non-competition and non-solicitation. The employment agreements for Messrs. Murren and Baldwin specifically provide that, if he breaches certain of his obligations of notice, non-competition or non-solicitation during the 12 months following termination (or for a shorter period as provided in his employment agreement), we will have no further obligation to him under his employment agreement, other than with respect to the following: (i) any accrued and unpaid salary; (ii) if unpaid, any bonus in respect of the most recently completed fiscal year of the Company (determined in accordance with the bonus plan, including the exercise of discretion which may reduce or eliminate such bonus); (iii) business or travel expense reimbursements; and (iv) with respect to any SARs granted to Mr. Murren on April 6, 2009 and Mr. Baldwin on December 13, 2010, the right to exercise any such SARs, to the extent vested, generally for 90 days after breach (but the vesting period for such SARs ends on the date of violation). Mr. Murren will also remain entitled to receive Additional Cash Awards provided for in his employment agreement that are vested and unpaid. The employment agreements of Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders and Hornbuckle provide that certain restrictions relating to non-competition and non-solicitation will cease if employment is terminated by Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle, as applicable, for good cause.
Use of Grantor Trusts
The Company will, within five business days after termination of Messrs. Murren’s or Baldwin’s employment, make an irrevocable contribution of an amount equal to the aggregate amount of any payments due to him following termination to a grantor trust with a financial institution approved by him, under the terms of which the assets of the trust may be used, in the absence of the Company’s insolvency, solely for purposes of fulfilling the Company’s obligations to make such payments to him. If any payments owed by the Company to Mr. D’Arrigo in connection with his termination of employment would be subject to a six-month delay in accordance with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, the Company will, within five business days after such termination of employment, make an irrevocable contribution of an amount equal to the aggregate amount of any such delayed payments due to Mr. D’Arrigo to a grantor trust with a financial institution approved by Mr. D’Arrigo under the terms of which the assets of the trust may be used, in the absence of the Company’s insolvency, solely for purposes of fulfilling the Company’s obligations to make such delayed payments to Mr. D’Arrigo.


48


Potential Payments Table
The following table indicates the estimated amounts that would be payable to each Named ExecutiveNEO upon a termination under the scenarios outlined above, excluding termination by the Company for good cause (other than death or disability). With respect to a change of control, the table indicates the maximum estimated amounts that may be payable to each Named Executive upon a termination in connection with a change of control based on the scenarios outlined above, disregarding any provisions in the employment agreements relating to the application of Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code. For all Named Executives, the estimated amounts payable are calculated based on their employment agreements in effect as of December 31, 2010 and assuming that such termination occurred on December 31, 2010. For purposes of the table below, we have assumed thathypothetical termination as of December 31, 2010 means a2023 under various termination following completionscenarios, pursuant to the applicable employment agreements, policies and terms of the Company’s then-current fiscal year. In addition, we used the closing priceequity awards in effect as of our Common Stock at December 31, 2010 for purposes of these calculations. There can be no assurance that these scenarios would produce the same or similar results as those disclosed herein if any of these events occur in the future.
                             
    Non-Equity
   Vesting of
      
    Incentive Plan
 Pension
 Stock Options
 Vesting of
    
  Salary(A) Payments(B) Enhancement or SARs(C) RSUs(D) Other(E) Total
 
Death or Disability
James J. Murren $2,000,000  $6,122,924  $  $16,548,063  $259,875  $434,216  $25,365,078 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  168,750         101,158         269,908 
Robert H. Baldwin  1,650,000   1,229,301      2,133,327   92,813   98,164   5,203,605 
Corey I. Sanders  200,000         887,700         1,087,700 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  275,000         416,250         691,250 
 
Company Terminates for Other Than Good Cause
James J. Murren $7,000,000  $6,122,924  $  $16,548,063  $259,875  $434,216  $30,365,078 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  467,877         101,158      18,246   587,281 
Robert H. Baldwin  4,000,000   1,229,301      2,133,327   92,813   98,164   7,553,605 
Corey I. Sanders  2,075,616         1,714,950   11,138   43,357   3,845,061 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  1,377,260         897,938   91,342   91,329   2,457,869 
 
Named Executive Terminates for Good Cause
James J. Murren $7,000,000  $6,122,924  $  $16,548,063  $259,875  $434,216  $30,365,078 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo           101,158         101,158 
Robert H. Baldwin  4,000,000   1,229,301      2,133,327   92,813   98,164   7,553,605 
Corey I. Sanders           887,700         887,700 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV           416,250         416,250 
 
Named Executive Terminates Without Good Cause
James J. Murren $  $6,122,924  $  $5,605,000  $  $  $11,727,924 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo           101,158         101,158 
Robert H. Baldwin     1,229,301      1,351,921         2,581,222 
Corey I. Sanders           887,700         887,700 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV           416,250         416,250 
 
Change of Control
James J. Murren $7,000,000  $6,122,924  $  $20,750,000  $  $434,216  $34,307,140 
Daniel J. D’Arrigo  467,877         313,955   226,344   18,246   1,026,422 
Robert H. Baldwin  4,000,000   1,229,301      3,069,890   278,438   98,164   8,675,793 
Corey I. Sanders  2,075,616         1,714,950   11,138   43,357   3,845,061 
William J. Hornbuckle, IV  1,377,260         897,938   91,342   91,329   2,457,869 
such date.

   SEVERANCE(A) 

VESTING

OF RSUs(B)(C)

 

VESTING

OF PERFORMANCE

BASED STOCK

UNITS(B)(C)(D)

 OTHER TOTAL

Death or Disability

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $6,000,000  $13,054,200  $19,051,776  $  $38,105,976

Mr. Halkyard

   2,750,000   3,227,415   4,896,928      10,874,343

Mr. Sanders

   3,437,500   5,556,807   7,601,722      16,596,029

Mr. Fritz

   2,500,000   4,804,753   7,853,270       15,158,023

Mr. McManus

   2,025,000   3,095,073    4,262,158      9,382,231

Company Terminates Without Good Cause

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $9,000,000  $9,410,770  $15,922,469  $45,280  $34,378,519

Mr. Halkyard

    2,750,000    1,079,022   3,356,255    33,960   7,219,237

Mr. Sanders

   3,437,500   4,190,537   6,428,195   11,552   14,067,784

Mr. Fritz

   2,500,000   1,673,266   5,752,340   23,938   9,949,544

Mr. McManus

   2,025,000   2,275,284   3,558,038   33,960   7,892,282

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

67


Compensation Tables

   SEVERANCE(A) 

VESTING

OF RSUs(B)(C)

 

VESTING

OF PERFORMANCE

BASED STOCK

UNITS(B)(C)(D)

 OTHER TOTAL

NEO Terminates Without Good Cause/Company Terminates With Good Cause

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $  $  $  $  $

Mr. Halkyard

               

Mr. Sanders

               

Mr. Fritz

               

Mr. McManus

               

NEO Terminates With Good Cause

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $9,000,000  $9,410,770  $15,922,469  $45,280  $34,378,519

Mr. Halkyard

   2,750,000   1,079,022   3,356,255   33,960   7,219,237

Mr. Sanders

   3,437,500   4,190,537   6,428,195   11,552   14,067,784

Mr. Fritz

   2,500,000   1,673,266   5,752,340   23,938   9,949,544

Mr. McManus

   2,025,000   2,275,284   3,558,038   33,960   7,892,282

Change of Control(E)

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $16,000,000  $13,054,200  $19,051,776  $45,280  $48,151,256

Mr. Halkyard

   5,775,000   3,227,415   4,896,928   45,280   13,944,623

Mr. Sanders

   7,343,750   5,556,807   7,601,722   15,403   20,517,682

Mr. Fritz

   5,000,000   4,804,753   7,853,270   31,918   17,689,941

Mr. McManus

   4,162,500   3,095,073   4,262,158   45,280   11,565,011

Retirement Pursuant to Retirement Policy(F)

          

Mr. Hornbuckle

  $  $8,196,323  $13,697,727  $  $21,894,050

Mr. Halkyard

               

Mr. Sanders

      3,735,114   5,593,892      9,329,006

Mr. Fritz

               

Mr. McManus

      2,002,021   3,057,452      5,059,473

(A)For Messrs. Murren or Baldwin, salary is paid for 12 months following

This column does not include any unpaid prior-year bonuses that were earned prior to the date of death or disability (net of any applicable payments received from any short-term disability policy). For Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle, salary is paid for three months following the date of death or disability (net of any applicable payments received from any short-term disability policy), whether or not such termination occurs prior to or after a change of control. Upon termination of Messrs. Murren or Baldwin by the Company for other than good cause or by him for good cause, he is entitled to 12 months of salary at regular payroll intervals plus a lump sumtermination.


49


payment equal to the excess of $7,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Murren) or $4,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Baldwin) over the continued salary paid for the12-month period. Upon termination by the Company for other than good cause, Messrs. D’Arrigo, Sanders or Hornbuckle is entitled to receive salary for the remaining term of his employment contract at regular payroll intervals, whether or not such termination occurs prior to or after a change of control. If Messrs. Murren or Baldwin terminate his employment on or within 90 days following a change of control, then, as applicable, Mr. Murren is entitled to a lump sum amount of $7,000,000 and Mr. Baldwin is entitled to a lump sum of $4,000,000; provided, however, upon a termination by Messrs. Murren or Baldwin on or within 90 days following a change of control which is a not a “change in control event” as described in Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, he is instead entitled to 12 months of salary at regular payroll intervals and a lump sum payment equal to the excess of $7,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Murren) or $4,000,000 (with respect to Mr. Baldwin) over the continued salary paid for the12-month period.
(B)With respect to Messrs. Murren or Baldwin, non-equity incentive plan amounts payable upon death, disability, termination by us without good cause, termination by him for good cause or termination by him on or within 90 days following a change of control are assumed to be equal to the non-equity incentive plan amounts paid to him in 2011 for 2010. Mr. Murren is entitled to receive an Additional Cash Award of $1,062,500 (which vested on September 30, 2009), $1,062,500 (which vested on March 31, 2010) and $1,062,500 (which vested on September 30, 2010) and, in each case, was paid within 10 business days following March 31, 2011. Additionally, this column reflects bonuses that were awarded to Messrs. Murren, D’Arrigo, Sanders and Hornbuckle in 2011 in respect of their service in 2010 (which bonuses are included in the Bonus column of the Summary Compensation Table above), although these bonuses were discretionary and not a contractual right under their respective employment agreements.
(C)As stated above, the

The value of outstanding stock optionsRSUs, Absolute TSR PSUs and SARsRelative TSR PSUs (including any accelerated or continued vesting that would occur under each of these termination scenarios) is based on the closing price of our Common Stock at December 31, 2010,29, 2023, which was $14.85. The termination scenarios above assume performance-based SARs will vest; provided that with respect to Mr. Murren’s April 6, 2009 grant of 500,000 SARs which, as one condition of vesting, the average closing price of our Common Stock must be at least $17.00 during any 20 consecutive trading days SARs (the “$17 Performance-Vesting SARs”), (i) to the extent Mr. Murren’s employment terminates under a scenario which results in the extension$44.68.

(C)

For purposes of the calculation of any continued or accelerated vesting period for two years,in respect of outstanding equity awards, we have assumed that, in connection with each NEO’s termination, such NEO was eligible for the price-basedmaximum post-termination continued and accelerated vesting condition is satisfied during such period applicable to each award.

(D)

Assumes that December 31, 2023 was the end of the performance period for Absolute TSR PSUs and (ii)Relative TSR PSUs.

(E)

Assumes each NEO’s employment terminates (other than as a result of a termination by the “Change of Control” column assumes that Mr. Murren exercises his change of control termination rightCompany for good cause or by the NEO without good cause) in connection with a “continuing change of control” (as definedcontrol. In general, no benefits are payable solely as a result of a change of control (i.e., in general, there are no single trigger benefits). The only situation in which change of control benefits are potentially payable absent an executive’s termination is the case of equity awards in the $17 Performance-Vesting SARs agreement). The potential payments outlined above include payments, if any, in respectevent they are not assumed as part of the outstanding equity awardschange of each Named Executive after applyingcontrol. In the applicable treatmentevent of such awards in connection with each ofa triggering event occurring, the termination scenarios (as describedNEO would receive estimated benefits set forth in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above or the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section above).

(D)As stated above, the valuecolumns entitled “Vesting of outstanding RSUs that would vest (or continue to vest) under eachRSUs” and “Vesting of these termination scenarios is based on the closing price of our CommonPerformance Based Stock at December 31, 2010. The termination scenarios above assume performance-based RSUs will vest; provided that with respect to Mr. Murren’s October 4, 2011 grant of RSUs any accelerated vesting he may be eligible to receive would not occur until the related performance conditions for those RSUs were satisfied in on or about June 2011. The potential payments outlined above include payments, if any, in respect of the outstanding RSUs of each Named Executive after applying the applicable treatment of such RSUs in connection with each of the termination scenarios (as described in the footnotes to the “Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year-End” table above or the “Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control” section above).
(E)Includes an estimate of group life insurance premiums, reimbursement of medical expenses and associated taxes and premiums for long term disability insurance to be provided under each of the scenarios based on actual amounts paid out in 2010.Units.”


50


DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
The following table sets forth information regarding director compensation during 2010.
                             
          Change in
    
          Pension
    
      Stock
   Value and
    
      Appreciation
   Nonqualified
    
  Fees Earned
   Rights and
 Non-Equity
 Deferred
    
  or Paid
 Stock
 Option
 Incentive Plan
 Compensation
 All Other
  
Name
 in Cash (A) Awards Awards(B) Compensation Earnings Compensation(C) Total
 
Directors
                            
William A. Bible $89,500  $  $  $  $  $  $89,500 
Burton M. Cohen  57,000                  57,000 
Willie D. Davis  103,500      150,336            253,836 
Alexis M. Herman  114,000      150,336            264,336 
Roland Hernandez  185,000      150,336            335,336 
Kirk Kerkorian  50,000                  50,000 
Anthony Mandekic  125,500      150,336            275,836 
Rose McKinney-James  103,000      150,336            253,336 
Daniel J. Taylor  103,500      150,336            253,836 
Melvin B. Wolzinger  102,500      150,336            252,836 
Former Directors(D)
                            
Kenny C. Guinn  91,000      150,336            241,336 
Joseph Sugerman  17,000                  17,000 
(F)
(A)Directors who are compensated as full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries receive no additional compensation for service on the Board of Directors or its committees. Each director who is not a full-time employee of the Company or its subsidiaries is paid $50,000 per annum, plus $1,500 for each Board meeting attended (regardless of whether such Board meeting is attended in person or telephonically). The Chair of the Audit Committee receives an annual fee of $25,000 plus a fee of $2,500 per meeting attended. Each other member of the Audit Committee receives $1,500 for each meeting attended. The Chair of the Compensation Committee receives an annual fee of $10,000 plus a fee of $1,500 per meeting attended. Each other member of the Compensation Committee receives $1,000 for each meeting attended. The Chair of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee receives an annual fee of $10,000 plus a fee of $1,500 per meeting attended. Each other member of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee receives $1,000 for each meeting attended. Mr. Hernandez, as Lead Independent Director, also attended meetings of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee in 2010 and received committee member fees for his attendance. The Chair of the Diversity and Community Affairs Committee receives an annual fee of $10,000 plus a fee of $2,500 per meeting attended. Each other member of the Diversity and Community Affairs Committee receives $1,500 for each meeting attended. The non-management directors who serve on the Executive Committee receive a fee of $1,500 per meeting attended. The Lead Independent Director receives a fee of $2,500 per meeting of the independent, non-management directors. Directors are also reimbursed expenses for attendance at Board and committee meetings. The foregoing fees are paid quarterly. In addition, Mr. Taylor received an additional $500 for chairing one meeting of the Nominating/Corporate Governance Committee and Ms. McKinney-James receives an annual fee of $5,000 for serving on the Board of Directors of MGM Grand Detroit, LLC, which fee is payable in equal quarterly installments. This column also includes fees earned or paid to directors for any other committees on which they served or for which they attended meetings.
(B)The amount reflected in the table is the grant date fair value of 2010 awards computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718. Each of the directors, except Mr. Kerkorian and directors who are full-time employees of the Company or its subsidiaries, received a grant of 20,000 stock appreciation rights in 2010. All grants to directors were valued using the Black-Scholes Model with assumptions as described in Note 12 to the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements, which are included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, filed on February 28, 2011.

As of December 31, 2010,2023, Mr. Hornbuckle, Mr. Sanders and Mr. McManus are all eligible for retirement benefits under the aboveRetirement Policy.


51

Employment Agreements


We believe that maintaining employment agreements with our NEOs serves the dual purpose of acting as a retention tool and incentivizing long-term performance. In 2022, we successfully negotiated new employment agreements with Messrs. Hornbuckle, Sanders, Halkyard and McManus. Specifically, on August 18, 2022 we entered into employment agreements

68 

directors had outstanding option and stock appreciation rights awards as follows: 40,000 for Mr. Bible; 40,000 for Mr. Cohen; 139,750 for Mr. Davis; 125,000 for Ms. Herman; 135,000 for Mr. Hernandez; 100,000 for Mr. Mandekic; 109,000 for Ms. McKinney-James; 100,000 for Mr. Taylor; 135,000 for Mr. Wolzinger; 20,000 for Mr. Guinn; and 20,000 for Dr. Sugerman.
 
(C)

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

The Board has adopted a policy on benefits available to non-employee directors, which provides for a limited number of complimentary entertainment tickets


Compensation Tables

with Messrs. Hornbuckle, Halkyard, Sanders and McManus, each effective September 1, 2022. Mr. Hornbuckle’s employment agreement provided for a term until August 31, 2026 and a minimum base salary of $2,000,000, commencing on September 1, 2022, and a target annual bonus of 200%, pro-rated for his bonus for the personal use of directors, as well as complimentary rooms, food and beverages for directors and their spouses or significant others when staying at a Company property on Company business and for complimentary rooms only when not on Company business. The policy further provides for a limited number of discounted rooms, on a space available basis, for friends and family of directors staying at a Company property.(D)Mr. Guinn served as a member of the Board of Directors until his death in July 2010. Dr. Sugerman resigned from the Board of Directors in February 2010.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Information regarding the name, age and position of each of the Company’s executive officers was provided in Item 1 of the Company’s Annual Report onForm 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010.
SELECTION OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
Proposal No. 2
2022. The Audit Committee has selected Deloitte & Touche LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the consolidated financial statements of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011 and to audit the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. During and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2010, Deloitte & Touche LLP audited and rendered opinions on the Company’s financial statements and internal control over financial reporting.
A representative of Deloitte & Touche LLP will be present at the stockholders’ meeting with the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and to respond to appropriate questions.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the ratification of the appointment of
Deloitte & Touche LLP as the Company’s independent registered accounting firm.
Fees Paid To Auditors
The following table sets forth fees paid to our auditors, Deloitte & Touche LLP, in 2010 and 2009 for audit and non-audit services.
         
  2010  2009 
 
Audit fees $2,750,000  $3,081,000 
Audit-related fees  89,000   90,000 
Tax fees  182,000   266,000 
All other fees      
         
Total $3,021,000  $3,437,000 
         
The category of “Audit fees” includes fees for our annual audit and quarterly reviews, the attestation reports on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, statutory audits required by gaming regulators and assistance with SEC filings.
The category of “Audit-related fees” includes employee benefit plan audits, accounting consultations, review of cash awards under incentive compensation plan, due diligence in connection with acquisitions and internal control reviews not associated with the attestation reports on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.


52


The category of “Tax fees” includes tax consultation, tax planning fees and tax compliance services.
The Audit Committee approved all of the services described above in accordance with the Company’s pre-approval policy.
Pre-Approved Policies and Procedures
Our Audit Committee Charter contains our policy related to pre-approval of services provided by the independent auditor. Pursuant to this policy, the Audit Committee, or the Chair of the Audit Committee to whom such authority was delegated by the Audit Committee, must pre-approve all services provided by the independent auditor. Any such pre-approval by the Chair must be presented to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting.
ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Proposal No. 3
The recently enacted Dodd-Frank Act enables our stockholders to vote to approve, on an advisory (non-binding) basis, the compensation of our Named Executives as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with the SEC’s rules, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure (also referred to as“say-on-pay”).
Stockholders are encouraged to read the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement for a more detailed discussion of how the Company’s compensation programs reflect our overarching compensation philosophy and core principles. We are asking our stockholders to indicate their support for our Named Executive compensation as described in this Proxy Statement. This voteagreement provides that Mr. Hornbuckle is not intended to address any specific item of compensation, but rather the overall compensation of our Named Executives. Accordingly, we will ask our stockholders to vote FOR adoption of the following resolution:
“RESOLVED, that the stockholders of MGM Resorts International approve, on an advisory basis, the compensation of our Named Executives as disclosed in this Proxy Statement in accordance with Item 402 ofRegulation S-K, including the Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the Summary Compensation Table and related tables and disclosure.”
The advisory vote will not be binding on the Compensation Committee or the Board of Directors.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR adoption of this proposal.


53


ADVISORY VOTE ON FREQUENCY OF ADVISORY VOTE ON EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Proposal No. 4
The Dodd-Frank Act also requires the Company to seek a non-binding advisory stockholder vote on how frequently we should seek an advisory vote on the compensation of our Named Executives, such as Proposal 3 included in this Proxy Statement. We are required by the Dodd-Frank Act to provide stockholders with a“say-on-pay” vote every one, two or three years, as determined by a separate advisory stockholder vote held at least once every six years.
After careful consideration of this proposal, our Board of Directors has determined that an advisory vote on executive compensation that occurs every year is the most appropriate alternative for the Company. In formulating its recommendation, the Board of Directors considered that an annual advisory vote on executive compensation will allow our stockholders to provide us with their direct input on the compensation of our Named Executives as disclosed in the proxy statement every year. Additionally, an annual advisory vote on executive compensation is consistent with our policy of seeking input from, and engaging in discussions with, our stockholders on corporate governance matters and our Named Executive compensation.
The approval of a majority of votes cast is required for advisory (non-binding) approval of Proposal 4. If none of the alternatives of Proposal 4 (one year, two years or three years) receives a majority vote, we will consider the highest number of votes cast by stockholders to be the frequency that has been selected by stockholders on an advisory basis. The advisory vote will not be binding on the Board of Directors or the Company. However, they will consider the outcome of the vote when determining the frequency ofsay-on-pay advisory votes.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR the EVERY ONE YEAR option as the frequency
with which stockholders are provided an advisory vote on the compensation of our
Named Executives as disclosed pursuant to the compensation disclosure rules of the SEC.


54


AMENDMENT AND RESTATEMENT OF OUR AMENDED AND RESTATED CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION TO INCREASE THE NUMBER OF AUTHORIZED SHARES OF COMMON STOCK TO 1,000,000,000
Proposal No. 5
The Company’s Board of Directors believes it is advisable and in the best interests of the Company to amend and restate our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of shares of our Common Stock authorized for issuance from 600,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 in order to give the Company greater flexibility in considering and planning for future potential business needs. Specifically, we propose to amend Article 4 to be read in its entirety as follows:
“The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 1,000,000,000 shares, all of which are to be common stock, and the par value of each of such shares is to be $0.01.”
Also, the Certificate of Incorporation is being amended to correct minor typographical errors. The proposed Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company is attached hereto in its entirety as Appendix A. If this proposal is approved, it will become effective upon filing the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware following the Annual Meeting.
Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation currently authorizes 600,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of April 21, 2011, [    l    ] shares of our Common Stock were issued and outstanding. Additionally, as of April 21, 2011, the Company had [    l    ] shares of Common Stock subject to outstanding but unexercised options or granted but unvested restricted stock or otherwise reserved for issuance under our existing equity compensation plans and convertible notes. Therefore, as of April 21, 2011, the Company had only approximately [    l    ] shares of Common Stock remaining that are available for future issuance.
Because we are approaching the limit of shares authorized for future issuance, the Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to give the Company greater flexibility in considering and planning for future business and financial needs. Other than our equity compensation plans, the Company’s outstanding 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2015 and the new convertible senior notes described below, the Company has no current plan, commitment, arrangement, understanding or agreement regarding the issuance of the additional shares of Common Stock resulting from the proposed increase in authorized shares. The additional shares of Common Stock would be available for issuance by the Board of Directors, subject to any contractual restrictions, for various corporate purposes, including but not limited to stock splits, stock dividends, grants under employee stock plans, financing transactions such as public or private offerings of Common Stock or convertible securities, potential strategic transactions (including mergers, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures, divestitures, and business combinations), as well as other general corporate transactions, although the Company has no present plans to use them in any such regard. If this proposal is approved, the Company would have approximately [    l    ] shares of Common Stock available for issuance. The increased number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock would enable the Company, subject to any contractual restrictions, to act with flexibility and issue additional shares of Common Stock as strategic opportunities arise, and to take advantage of changing market and financial conditions in a more timely manner, without the expense and delay of arranging a special meeting of stockholders.
On April 13, 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with Pansy Catalina Chiu King Ho and certain of her affiliates (collectively, the “Ho Parties”) pursuant to which the Company has agreed to offer and sell, and Ms. Ho, or an entity designated by Ms. Ho, has agreed to purchase, in each case subject to adoption of this Proposal 5, $300 million aggregate principal amount of convertible senior notes on terms substantially similar to those governing the Company’s outstanding 4.25% convertible senior notes due 2015 in a transaction exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which, unless there is a default under our senior credit facility, may be converted into our Common Stock at an initial conversion rate of approximately 53.83 shares of our Common Stock per $1,000 principal amount of notes (equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $18.58 per share of Common Stock and a conversion premium of 47.3% based on the last reported sale price per share of the Company’s Common Stock on the NYSE on April 12, 2011 of $12.61 per share). The applicable conversion rate is subject to adjustment if certain events occur. If this Proposal 5 is not approved, then the Company will not sell and issue the new series of convertible senior notes to the Ho Parties.
If the amendment to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is approved, the additional authorized shares would be available for issuanceeligible, at the discretion of the BoardHuman Capital and Compensation Committee, to receive annual equity grants of Directors,$10,000,000, starting in 2022, which are expected to be provided 40% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based stock units. In the event of a termination of Mr. Hornbuckle’s employment as the result of his death or a termination by the Company due to disability, we will pay Mr. Hornbuckle one year of salary payable at regular payroll intervals (less any payments received from an employer-paid short term disability policy). In the event of a termination by us for no cause or by Mr. Hornbuckle for good cause prior to the end of the term of the Agreement, Mr. Hornbuckle will receive one and a half times (i) his annual base salary and (ii) his target bonus, payable in 12 monthly installments. Any such severance payments will be subject to any contractual restrictions,applicable taxes and Mr. Hornbuckle’s execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims.

On August 18, 2022, we also entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Sanders that provides for a term until August 31, 2025 and a minimum base salary of $1,250,000, commencing on September 1, 2022. Mr. Sanders’ agreement also provides for an annual target bonus equal to 175% of his base salary. The agreement provides that Mr. Sanders is eligible, at the discretion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, to receive annual equity grants of $3,750,000, starting in 2022, which are expected to be provided 40% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based stock units. Mr. Sanders’ employment agreement incorporates the Severance Policy described below.

On August 18, 2022, we also entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. Halkyard that provides for a term until February 1, 2026 and a minimum base salary of $1,100,000, commencing on September 1, 2022. Mr. Halkyard’s agreement also provides for an annual target bonus equal to 150% of his base salary. The agreement provides that Mr. Halkyard is eligible, at the discretion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, to receive annual equity grants of $2,750,000, starting in 2022, which are expected to be provided 40% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based stock units. Mr. Halkyard’s employment agreement incorporates the Severance Policy described below.

On August 18, 2022, we also entered into a new employment agreement with Mr. McManus that provides for a term until August 31, 2026 and a minimum base salary of $900,000, commencing on September 1, 2022. Mr. McManus’ agreement also provides for an annual target bonus equal to 125% of his base salary. The agreement provides that Mr. McManus is eligible, at the discretion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, to receive annual equity grants of $2,250,000, starting in 2022, which are expected to be provided 40% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based stock units. With respect to severance, Mr. McManus’ employment agreement incorporates the Severance Policy described below.

On October 10, 2022, we entered into a new employment agreement, dated October 4, 2022, with Gary Fritz, our new President, Interactive. Mr. Fritz’s employment agreement provides for a term until September 30, 2026 and minimum base salary of $1,250,000 and an annual target bonus equal to 100% of his base salary. The agreement provides that Mr. Fritz is eligible, at the discretion of the Human Capital and Compensation Committee, to receive annual equity grants of $3,750,000, starting in 2022, which are expected to be provided 40% in RSUs and 60% in performance-based stock units. In addition, the agreement provides Mr. Fritz with two potential special bonus opportunities for $2,000,000 each, paid 50% as a lump sum cash amount and 50% in RSUs for (1) achievement of a trailing twelve month Adjusted EBITDA target at BetMGM, LLC and (2) successfully launching a defined digital offering on an MGM property. With respect to severance, Mr. Fritz’s employment agreement incorporates the Severance Policy described below and provides certain additional severance provisions as further described below.

Uniform Severance and Change of Control Policies (NEOs and other executive officers, other than the Chief Executive Officer)

In 2012, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee adopted a uniform severance policy for terminations by us without further stockholder approval, exceptcause or by the applicable executive officer with good cause, in either case, unrelated to a change of control (the “Severance Policy”), the provisions of which are now memorialized in each employment agreement for Messrs. Halkyard, Sanders, Fritz, and McManus, and in the terms of equity award agreements entered into with such NEOs. An overview of the severance benefits payable to Messrs. Halkyard, Sanders, Fritz, and McManus, under the Severance Policy are as may be requiredfollows:

1.0x the sum of base salary and target bonus, payable over a 12-month period.

One year of continued vesting of unvested equity awards (including unvested stock appreciation rights).

Lump sum payment equal in value to 12 months of continued health and insurance benefits (calculated as 1.5x times the cost of COBRA coverage for 12 months).

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

69


Compensation Tables

If the NEO remains employed at-will by the Company after the term of the agreement has expired and is thereafter separated during the applicable restricted period by the Company without good cause, the NEO will receive a lump sum payment equal to his base salary.

“Good Cause” by law or the rules of


55


the NYSE. Under NYSE rules, stockholder approvalNEO is generally defined as follows: (i) any assignment of duties that are materially and significantly different than those contemplated by the terms of the employment agreement; (ii) any material and significant limitation on the executive’s powers not contemplated by the terms of the employment agreement; (iii) a material adverse change in reporting relationship, or (iv) the failure of the Company to pay the executive any compensation when due.

“Good Cause” by the Company is generally defined as: (i) the executive’s death or disability; (ii) failure to abide by the Company’s policies and procedures; misconduct, insubordination, inattention to the Company’s business; or failure to perform the duties required of him; dishonesty; or other material breach of the employment agreement; or (iii) failure to comply with certain licensing requirements contained in the executive’s employment agreement.

In addition to the above, Mr. Fritz’s employment agreement provides that in the event he is terminated following the consummation of a material acquisition in the digital gaming/interactive industry (or in the event he terminates his employment as a result thereof if the acquisition required him to re-locate outside of the U.S.) then he shall be entitled to severance consisting of (A) 2.0x the sum of his base salary and target bonus and payable over a 24-month period, and (B) 1.5x the cost of COBRA coverage for a transaction that resultsperiod of 12 months, payable as a lump sum. Mr. Fritz would also receive continued vesting of his outstanding equity awards consistent with a Company termination without good cause scenario, resulting in a 20% or more increase in the numbertotal compensation for such scenario of shares outstanding. The additional shares of authorized Common Stock would have the same rights and privileges as the shares of our Common Stock currently issued and outstanding. Holders of our Common Stock have no preemptive rights under our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation; however under a stockholder agreement, Infinity World has certain preemptive rights discussed above under “Stockholder Agreements.” The adoption of the amendment would have no immediate dilutive effect on the proportional voting power or other rights of existing stockholders, but$12,449,544. Furthermore, Mr. Fritz may terminate for “Good Cause” if the Company issues additional sharesrequires him to relocate his office from the greater Seattle, Washington area.

Death or Disability

If the employment of Common Stocka NEO is terminated under his employment agreement by us as a result of death or securities convertible intodisability, he (or his beneficiaries) will generally be entitled to receive salary continuation for a twelve-month period following termination (net of any applicable payments received from any short-term disability policy), and any accrued but unpaid compensation and benefits. Pursuant to the terms of the Company’s outstanding award agreements the participant is entitled to full acceleration and payment of all time-based awards as of the date of termination and (i) rPSUs will accelerate and vest in full based on relative performance to the date of termination and (ii) absolute PSUs will accelerate and vest in full based on target, if such termination is within the first twelve-months of the performance period, or exercisable for Common Stock as contemplatedafter such twelve-month period, based on actual performance projected through the end of the performance period.

Change of Control Policy

In 2022, in connection with the agreemententry into new employment agreements with the Ho Parties discussed above,NEOs, the Human Capital and Compensation Committee amended and restated its uniform severance policy for terminations by us following a change of control (the “Change of Control Policy”), which is applicable to all NEOs. The Change of Control Policy is the only source of change of control severance benefits for our NEOs (other than with respect to the treatment of equity awards). The Change of Control Policy was amended and restated on August 16, 2022 to, among other things, (i) amend the definition of “Change of Control” to replace the prior asset sale language with an “all or substantially all” standard, (ii) amend the definition of “Separation Benefits” (Separation Benefits are generally payable if the participant is terminated within six months before or one year after a Change of Control by the Employer without “Employer’s Good Cause” or by the participant with “Participant’s Good Cause,” as such issuance could have a dilutive effect on the equity, earnings and voting interests of existing stockholders. The increaseterms are defined in the numberPolicy) to include a prorated portion of authorized sharestheir target bonus through the date of Common Stock also could discouragetermination, (iii) revise the definition of “Employer’s Good Cause” to include termination in connection with a participant’s conviction of a crime related to the Company or hinder effortsany felony and to heighten the misconduct standard to gross misconduct, (v) remove the maximum dollar limitations on separation payments payable to the CEO and other participants and (vi) reduce the severance multiple for the non-CEO participants from two times to one and a half times.

70 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Compensation Tables

The benefits provided under the Change of Control Policy to our NEOs were as follows, as of December 31, 2023:

POSITION

CHANGE-OF-CONTROL SEVERANCE

(TERMINATION BY US WITHOUT GOOD CAUSE, OR BY EXECUTIVE

OFFICER WITH GOOD CAUSE, FOLLOWING CHANGE OF CONTROL)

CEO

2.0x the sum of base salary and target bonus.

Lump sum payment equal in value to 24 months of continued health and insurance benefits.

Full vesting of time-based unvested equity awards; performance-based equity awards, to the extent unearned, will continue to be subject to the applicable performance conditions.

The CEO may instead elect to receive severance benefits pursuant to his employment agreement (as described above), to the extent aggregate cash benefits payable pursuant to the Change of Control Policy prove to be less than the severance benefits he would receive pursuant to his employment agreement.

Other Executive Officers
(including NEOs other than CEO)

1.5x the sum of base salary and target bonus. Lump sum payment equal in value to 24 months of continued health and insurance benefits.

Full vesting of time-based unvested equity awards; performance-based equity awards, to the extent unearned, will continue to be subject to the applicable performance conditions.

The above benefits are provided by the Change of Control Policy.

Termination by Company for Good Cause or by NEO Without Good Cause

If a NEO terminates his employment under his employment agreement without good cause, or we terminate such employment for good cause, then vested but unexercised stock options, SARs or other partiesstock-based compensation awards continue to obtainremain exercisable (to the extent applicable) generally during the 90-day period following termination.

Obligations of the NEOs

Obligations of the NEOs under the employment agreements relating to confidentiality, providing services to competitors and others, and soliciting customers and Company employees continue after termination of employment, regardless of the reason for such termination (with some exceptions for certain NEOs upon a change of control of the Company thereby having an anti-takeover effect, althoughor if the NEO terminates for good cause). With the exception of obligations relating to confidentiality, which are not limited by time, these restrictions generally continue for the 12-month period following termination (or for such period that is notremains in the intentterm of the agreement if less than 12 months).

MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement

71


CEO Pay Ratio Disclosure

CEO PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE

As required by Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street and Consumer Protection Act and Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K, we are providing the following information about the relationship of the annual total compensation of Mr. Hornbuckle, our Chief Executive Officer as of the Determination Date (as defined below), and the annual total compensation of our Board of Directorsemployees.

Pursuant to the applicable SEC rules, in proposingorder to calculate the amendment. The amendmentpay ratio for 2023, we used a median employee identified in 2021. Last year, to our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is not being proposed in response to any known threat to acquire controlidentify the median of the Company.

The Boardannual total compensation of Directors recommends a vote FOR adoptionall our employees (other than the CEO) for 2021, we took the following steps:

We determined that, as of this proposal.


56


APPROVAL OF THE AMENDED AND RESTATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE-BASED
INCENTIVE PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
Proposal No. 6
The AmendedOctober 1, 2021 (the “Determination Date”), our employee population consisted of approximately 61,004 employees. This population consisted of our full-time, part-time, seasonal and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers (previously defined in this Proxy Statementtemporary employees employed by us on that date and included our employees as well as the “Incentive Plan”) is an annualemployees of our consolidated subsidiaries, including 10,178 employees employed by MGM China.

To identify the “median employee” from our employee population, we compared cash compensation (which included salary, bonus, plan designed to provide certain executive officerstips and other designatedcash-based wages) of these employees with incentivethrough October 1, 2021, as reflected in our internal payroll records. This compensation based upon the achievement of pre-established performance goals. With this proposal, the primary purpose for askingmeasure was consistently applied to all employees included in our stockholders to approve the Incentive Plan, as amended, is to ensure that certain incentive awards granted under the Incentive Plan may continue to qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 162(m)”). The Board of Directors also approved certain modifications to the Incentive Plan, as described below. Our Board of Directors has approved the Incentive Plan as amended and restated, subject to stockholder approval at the Annual Meeting.

Generally, Section 162(m) places a limit on the deductibility for federal income tax purposes ofcalculations. We converted the compensation paid to non-U.S. employees in local currency to U.S. dollars using the Company’s Chief Executive Officeraverage exchange rate for the 12 months ended December 31, 2021. We did not make any cost-of-living adjustments in identifying the “median employee” and we did not annualize the Company’s three most highly compensated executive officers (other thancompensation of any employee group. In 2023, the Company’s Chief Financial Officer). Under Section 162(m), compensation paid to such persons in excess of $1 million inoriginally identified median employee assumed a taxable year is not generally deductible. However, compensation that qualifies as “performance-based” under Section 162(m) does not count against the $1 million limitation. One of the requirements of “performance-based” compensation for purposes of Section 162(m) is that the material terms of the performance goals under which compensation may be paid be disclosed to and approved by the Company’s stockholders. In addition, Section 162(m) provides that ifnew role at the Company, retains the authority towhich included a significant change the targets under a performance goal, then the Company must disclose the material terms of the performance goals to stockholders for re-approval every five years.
The Board has approved certain other modifications to the Incentive Plan, including certain miscellaneous changes. As such, the Company is seeking stockholder approval of the entire Incentive Plan, as amended and restated, including the material terms of the performance goals thereunder. The material changes made to the Incentive Plan include:
• Revising the eligibility provisions to (i) clarify that the Company’s Named Executives are eligible to participate, and (ii) expand the eligible pool to include Company employees who may become a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) and others, in each case, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion;
• Clarifying that approved awards under the Incentive Plan would be paid between January 1st and March 15th following the year to which the particular award relates, which maintains the current payment schedule but is intended to prevent certain adverse tax consequences if the date is unintentionally missed;
• Making awards subject to the Company’s clawback policies; and
• Clarifying that the Incentive Plan be interpreted to comply with Section 162(m) and to comply with or be exempt from Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code.
The Board of Directors believes that it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders to enable the Company to implement in the Incentive Plan compensation arrangements that qualify as tax-deductible performance-based compensation. If our stockholders do not approve this proposal, then there will be no impact on the terms of the Incentive Plan, which will continue to remain in existence, and shares of stock may continue to be awarded in accordance with the terms of the Incentive Plan. The only impact on the Company will be that some or all of the value of certain awards that are based on the achievement of one or more performance goals will no longer be deductible by the Company under the Internal Revenue Code as a result of the limitations imposed under Section 162(m).
The following is a summary of the principal features of the Incentive Plan, as amended and restated. This summary is qualified in its entirety by reference to the complete text of the Incentive Plan, which is attached to this Proxy Statement as Appendix B.


57


Description of the Incentive Plan
Purpose.  The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to provide an incentive for superior performance and to motivate participating officers toward the highest levels of achievement and business results, to tie their goals and interests to those of the Company and its stockholders, and to enable the Company to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers. Awards granted under the Incentive Plan are also intended to qualify as performance-based compensation under Section 162(m).
Eligibility.  Participation in the Incentive Plan is limited to those executive officers of the Company who are (a) officers among the Named Executives in the Company’s annual proxy statements, and (b) employees of the Company who may become a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) and such other employees, in each case, as determined by the Compensation Committee in its discretion. Each year, the Compensation Committee will designate in writing which executive officers and employees shall participate in the Incentive Plan.
Administration.  The Incentive Plan currently is administered by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company. All members of the Compensation Committee must be persons who qualify as “outside directors” under the Internal Revenue Code. The Compensation Committee shall have full power and authority to administer and interpret the provisions of the Incentive Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations, agreements, guidelines and instruments for the administration of the Incentive Plan and for the conduct of its business as the Compensation Committee deems necessary or advisable. Additionally, the Compensation Committee has certain power to delegate the authority to administer and interpret the procedural aspects of the Incentive Plan.
Performance Period.  Generally, the performance period under the Incentive Plan shall be the fiscal year beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31. However, the Compensation Committee may designate different performance periods under the Incentive Plan, which need not be identical for all participants.
Performance Goals.  Generally, within the first 90 days of each performance period, the Compensation Committee shall establish in writing, with respect to such performance period, one or more performance goals, a specific target objective or objectives with respect to such performance goals, and an objective formula or method for computing the amount of bonus compensation awardable to each participant if the performance goals are attained. Performance goals shall be based upon one or more of the following business criteria for the Company as a whole or any of its subsidiaries or operating units: stock price; market share; gross revenue; pretax operating income; cash flow; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per share; return on equity; return on invested capital or assets; return on revenues; cost reductions and savings; productivity; equity capital raised; or consummation of debt and equity offerings. The foregoing performance goals shall have any reasonable definitions that the Compensation Committee may specify and may be compared to the performance of a group of comparable companies, or a published or special index, that the Compensation Committee, in its discretion, deems appropriate. Measurements against the performance goals shall be objectively determinable and, to the extent they are expressed in standard accounting terms, shall be determined according to generally accepted accounting principles as in existence on the date on which the performance goals are established. The Compensation Committee may adjust the performance goals in the event of the following occurrences: (a) non-recurring events, including divestitures, reorganizations and spin-offs; (b) mergers and acquisitions; and (c) financing transactions.
Maximum Award.  The maximum bonus that any participant may be awarded for any plan year is $8 million.
Certification of Awards.  Generally, as soon as practicable after the end of each performance period, the Compensation Committee shall certify in writing to what extent the performance goals have been achieved for such performance period and shall calculate the amount of each participant’s bonus for such performance period based upon the performance goals, objectives, and computation formulae that were set for such performance period. The Compensation Committee shall have no discretion to increase the amount of any participant’s bonus as so determined, but may reduce or totally eliminate any participant’s bonus if it determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate with respect to the participant’s performance or any other factors material to the goals, purposes, and administration of the Incentive Plan.


58


Payment of Awards.  Approved bonus awards shall be payable in cash or stock between January 1st and March 15th of the year following the year to which the bonus awards relate, subject to the Compensation Committee’s certification in writing that the relevant performance goals were achieved. Awards that are otherwise payable to a participant who is not employed by the Company as of the last day of a performance period may be prorated or eliminated pursuant to rules established by the Compensation Committee in accordance with the Incentive Plan.
Non-Transferability of Awards.  Except as may be otherwise required by law, bonus awards under the Incentive Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, charge, garnishment, execution or levy of any kind, either voluntary or involuntary.
Amendment and Termination.  The Board of Directors may amend or terminate the Incentive Plan in whole or in part at any time. Any amendment required to conform the Incentive Plan to the requirements of the Internal Revenue Code may be made by the Compensation Committee unless otherwise prohibited by law. No amendment may be made to the class of individuals who are eligible to participate in the Incentive Plan or the performance criteria without stockholder approval unless stockholder approval is not required in order for bonuses paid to participants to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under the Internal Revenue Code.
Clawback.  All bonus awards shall be subject to the Company’s clawback policies, as may be amended from time to time.
The bonus awards paid to our Named Executives in 2010 under the Incentive Plan are listed in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table above. Awards under the Incentive Plan are determined based on future performance and are subject to negative adjustments by the Compensation Committee in its discretion, and, therefore, future actual awards cannot be determined.
If the Incentive Plan payments satisfy the exception to the deductibility cap in Section 162(m) and otherwise satisfy the requirements of deductibility under federal income tax law, the Company will receive a deduction for the amount constituting ordinary income to the participants.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table includes information about our equity compensation plans at December 31, 2010:
             
  Securities to be issued
 Weighted average
 Securities available for
  upon exercise of
 exercise price of
 future issuance under
  outstanding options,
 outstanding options,
 equity compensation
  warrants and rights warrants and rights plans
  (In thousands, except per share data)
 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders(1)  29,273  $21.73   10,714 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders         
(1)As of December 31, 2010, we had 1 million restricted stock units outstanding that do not have an exercise price; therefore, the weighted average per share exercise price only relates to outstanding stock options and stock appreciation rights. At this time, securities available for future issuance are limited to 3.3 million shares as a result of our October 2010 Common Stock offering, but see Proposal 5 in which we request approval of additional authorized shares of Common Stock.
The Board of Directors recommends a vote FOR adoption of this proposal.


59


STOCKHOLDER PROPOSAL
Proposal No. 7
The following proposal was submitted by the Office of the Comptroller of New York City, 1 Centre Street, New York, New York10007-2341 (the “Comptroller”) pursuant to authorization from the boards of trustees of the Funds (hereinafter defined). The Comptroller is the custodian and trustee of the New York City Employees’ Retirement System, the New York City Teachers’ Retirement System, the New York City Police Pension Fund and the New York City Fire Department Pension Fund, and custodian of the New York City Board of Education Retirement System (collectively, the “Funds”). As of December 21, 2010, the Funds were the collective owner of 584,865 shares of Common Stock that were held in custody since December 21, 2009. If the stockholder proponent, or a representative who is qualified under state law, is present and submits this proposal for a vote, then this proposal will be voted upon at the Annual Meeting. Approval of this proposal requires the affirmative vote of a majority of the votes cast by the holders of shares of Common Stock voting in person or by proxy at the Annual Meeting. In accordance with federal securities regulations, we include the stockholder proposal plus any supporting statements exactly as submitted by the proponent. As explained below, our Board unanimously recommends that you vote AGAINST this stockholder proposal.
WHEREAS:
Investors increasingly seek disclosure of companies’ social and environmental practices in the belief that they impact shareholder value. Many investors believe companies that are good employers, environmental stewards, and corporate citizens are more likely to be accepted in their communities and to prosper long-term. According to Innovest, an environmental investment research consultant, major investment firms includingABN-AMRO, Neuberger Herman, Schroders, T. Rowe Price, and Zurich Scudder subscribe to information on companies’ social and environmental practices.
Sustainability refers to development that meets present needs without impairing the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. The Dow Jones Sustainability Group defines corporate sustainability as “a business approach that creates long-term shareholder value by embracing opportunities and managing risks deriving from economic, environmental and social developments.”
Globally, over 1,900 companies produce reports on sustainability issues (www.corporateregister.com), including more than half of the global Fortune 500 (KPMG International Survey of Corporate Responsibility Reporting 2005).
Companies increasingly recognize that transparency and dialogue about sustainability are elements of business success. For example, Unilever’s Chairman stated in a 2003 speech, “So when we talk about corporate social responsibility, we don’t see it as something business “does” to society but as something that is fundamental to everything we do. Not just philanthropy or community investment, important though that is, but the impact of our operations and products as well as the interaction we have with the societies we serve.”
An October 6, 2004 statement published by social research analysts reported that they value public reporting because “we find compelling the large and growing body of evidence linking companies’ strong performance addressing social and environmental issues to strong performance in creating long-term shareholder value...We believe that companies can more effectively communicate their perspectives and report performance on complex social and environmental issues through a comprehensive report than through press releases and other ad hoc communications.” (www.socialinvest.org)
RESOLVED:  Shareholders request that the Board of Directors issue a report to shareholders, by June 30, 2012, at reasonable cost and omitting proprietary information, on the Company’s sustainability policies and performance, including multiple, objective statistical indicators.
Supporting Statement
The report should include the Company’s definition of sustainability, as well as a company-wide review of company policies, practices, and indicators related to measuring long-term social and environmental sustainability.


60


We recommend that the Company use the Global Reporting Initiative’s Sustainability Reporting Guidelines (“The Guidelines”) to prepare the report. The Global Reporting Initiative (www.globalreporting.org) is an international organization with representatives from the business, environmental, human rights, and labor communities. The Guidelines provide guidance on report content, including performance in six categories (direct economic impacts, environmental, labor practices and decent work conditions, human rights, society, and product responsibility). The Guidelines provide a flexible reporting system that permits the omission of content that is not relevant to company operations. Over 900 companies use or consult the Guidelines for sustainability reporting.
Board’s Recommendation:
We note that this stockholder proposal is similar to previous stockholder proposals received from the Office of the Comptroller of New York City which were considered and rejected by our stockholders at the last two annual meetings of stockholders.
We recognize the importance of utilizing sustainable business practices, operating “smarter” and more efficiently as we extend sustainable business practices to existing properties and new projects. The Company is committed to being a global leader in sustainability and stewardship of the environment, which we recognize brings value to both communities and our stockholders. This commitment is reflected first in our Code of Conduct, available on our website atwww.mgmresorts.com/codeofconductunder the caption “Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and Conflict of Interest Policy,” which requires our employees, directors, contractors and other agents to act with integrity in every aspect of our business and in full compliance will all applicable laws, including environmental laws.
Additionally, in 2006, the Company established the Energy and Environmental Services Division to ensure that the Company’s impact on the environment is fully defined and that programs and processes are put into place to mitigate any negative environmental impacts. As a result, the Company has implemented numerous conservation programsdetermined to use another employee whose compensation was substantially similar to the original median employee based on the compensation measure used to select the original median employee.

Based on this, we determined that substantially reduce electricity, gas,the median of the annual total compensation of all our employees, excluding the Chief Executive Officer, was $45,502 and water usage at allthe annual total compensation of Mr. Hornbuckle was $17,003,794, resulting in a ratio of the annual total compensation of our Las Vegas resorts. Chief Executive Officer to the median of the annual total compensation of all other employees included in our calculations of 374:1. We believe this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with Item 402(u) of Regulation S-K.

Because the SEC rules for identifying the median of the annual total compensation of our employees and calculating the pay ratio based on that employee’s annual total compensation allow companies to adopt a variety of methodologies, to apply certain exclusions, and to make reasonable estimates and assumptions that reflect their employee populations and compensation practices, the pay ratio reported by other companies may not be comparable to our pay ratio, as other companies have headquarters in different countries, have different employee populations and compensation practices and may utilize different methodologies, exclusions, estimates and assumptions in calculating their pay ratios.

72 

 MGM Resorts International 2024 Proxy Statement


Pay Versus Performance
PAY VERSUS PERFORMANCE
As required by Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K,
we are providing the following information about the relationship between executive “compensation actually paid” (“CAP”), and certain financial performance measurements with respect to the Company. The Human Capital and Compensation Committee does not utilize CAP as a basis for making compensation decisions. For further information concerning the Company’s pay for performance philosophy and how the Company aligns executive compensation with the Company’s performance, refer to “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis” on page 47.
PAY VS. PERFORMANCE TABLE
YEAR
 
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE
TOTAL FOR
PEO
(MR. HORNBUCKLE)
(A)
 
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE
TOTAL FOR
PEO
(MR. MURREN)
(A)
 
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY
PAID TO
PEO
(MR. HORNBUCKLE)
(B)
 
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY
PAID TO
PEO
(MR. MURREN)
(B)
 
AVERAGE
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE
TOTAL FOR
NON-PEO
NEOs
(C)
 
AVERAGE
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY
PAID TO
NON-PEO
NEOs
(B)(C)
 
VALUE OF INITIAL FIXED
$100 INVESTMENT
BASED ON:
 
NET
INCOME
(LOSS)
($
THOUSANDS)
(F)
 
RELATIVE
TSR
(G)
 
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN
(D)
 
PEER
GROUP
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDER
RETURN
(E)
2023  $17,003,794  $  $37,969,761  $  $6,096,685  $11,440,495  $135.40  $74.67  $1,314,924 78
th

percentile
2022   16,238,075      6,386,343      5,467,867   2,842,563   101.61   57.48   206,731 36
TH

percentile
2021   13,274,524      29,119,443      5,668,010   9,147,716   135.97   77.17   1,208,389 84
th

percentile
2020   13,988,135   36,180,335   22,190,584   24,162,737   5,440,857   5,270,119   95.44   88.55   (1,319,907) 23
rd

percentile
 
 
(A)Amounts represent total compensation as reported for Messrs. Hornbuckle and Murren for each corresponding year in the “Total” column of the Summary Compensation Table. Refer to “Executive Compensation—Compensation Tables—Summary Compensation Table.”
(B)
Amounts represent CAP, as computed in accordance with Item 402(v) of Regulation
S-K.
Amounts do not reflect the actual amount of compensation earned by or paid to the PEOs or the NEOs during the applicable year.
MGM Resorts International 
2024 Proxy Statement
73

Pay Versus Performance
Reconciliation of compensation actually paid to Mr. Hornbuckle, Mr. Murren and the other NEOs to amounts shown in the Summary Compensation Table
      
MINUS
 
PLUS
 
PLUS/
(MINUS)
 
PLUS
 
PLUS/
(MINUS)
 
MINUS
 
EQUALS
   
YEAR
 
SUMMARY
COMPENSATION
TABLE
TOTAL
($)
 
REPORTED
VALUE
OF EQUITY
AWARDS
(1)

($)
 
YEAR END
FAIR
VALUE OF
OUTSTANDING
AND
UNVESTED
EQUITY
AWARDS
GRANTED
DURING
FISCAL
YEAR
($)
 
YEAR OVER
YEAR CHANGE
IN FAIR VALUE
OF
OUTSTANDING
UNVESTED
EQUITY
AWARDS
GRANTED IN
PRIOR FISCAL
YEARS
($)
 
FAIR
VALUE AT
VESTING
DATE OF
EQUITY
AWARDS
GRANTED
AND
VESTED
DURING
THE
FISCAL
YEAR
($)
 
YEAR OVER
YEAR
CHANGE IN
FAIR
VALUE AS
OF THE
VESTING
DATE
(FROM THE
END OF
THE PRIOR
FISCAL
YEAR) OF
EQUITY
AWARDS
GRANTED
IN PRIOR
YEARS
VESTING
DURING
THE
FISCAL
YEAR
($)
 
FAIR VALUE
AS OF END
OF PRIOR
FISCAL
YEAR OF
EQUITY
AWARDS
GRANTED IN
PRIOR
FISCAL
YEAR THAT
FAIL TO
MEET THE
APPLICABLE
VESTING
CONDITIONS
DURING THE
FISCAL
YEAR
($)
 
COMPENSATION
ACTUALLY PAID
($)
PEO (Hornbuckle)
                  
   2023  $17,003,794  $(10,000,000)  $12,922,612  $6,984,340  $  $11,059,015  $  $37,969,761
   2022   16,238,075   (10,000,000)   10,933,421   (7,210,431)      (3,574,722)      6,386,343
   2021   13,274,524   (8,000,000)   8,065,872   12,016,295      3,762,752      29,119,443
    2020   13,988,135   (11,942,950)   23,378,267   (367,494)      (240,016)   (2,625,358)   22,190,584
PEO
(Murren)
                  
    2020  $36,180,335  $(10,870,634)  $  $(1,037,152)  $7,000,000  $(612,836)  $(6,496,976)  $24,162,737
Other Named Executive Officers (Average)
                  
   2023  $6,096,685  $(3,125,000)  $4,038,351  $2,285,821  $  $2,144,638  $  $11,440,495
   2022   5,467,867   (3,125,000)   3,416,725   (2,007,681)      (909,348)      2,842,563
   2021   5,668,010   (3,209,438)   3,489,191   1,883,198      1,316,755      9,147,716
    2020   5,440,857   (2,866,283)   4,570,363   (202,976)      (115,718)   (1,556,124)   5,270,119
The following programsinformation is relevant to the above table. The Reported Value of Equity Awards column includes the values originally reported in the Stock Awards column in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT). Fair value computations with respect to Absolute TSR PSUs and practices are some examplesRelative TSR PSUs were computed in accordance with FASB ASC 718 using a Monte Carlo simulation. Fair value computations with respect to RSUs were computed based on the value of MGM stock on the date of computation, i.e., the end of the many sustainability-focused programscalendar year, the date of vesting, or the date of forfeiture, as the case may be. Footnote (c) below contains the names of the Named Executive Officers included in the averages. No information is presented in this table with regard to equity awards issued with respect to the annual incentive plan that were reported in the
Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Compensation column of the SCT, or with respect to RSUs issued in lieu of salary during 2020 that were reported in the Salary column of the SCT. With respect to Messrs. Murren and practicesRafiq, both of whom terminated in 2020, a portion of their PSUs became time-vested at termination, but the ultimate payout depended on satisfaction of the performance conditions of such awards; accordingly, their vesting date was treated as the end of the applicable performance period. With respect to Messrs. Murren and Rafiq, both of whom terminated in 2020, a portion of their RSUs became time-vested at termination but were subject to payout on the original vesting dates; since payout on such dates was subject to satisfaction of restrictive covenants that were part of the Company has implemented:original terms of the award, the vesting date was treated as the original payment date. A portion of Mr. Murren’s $7 million RSU grant in 2020 was cash settled in 2020; since the original grant was reported in the Stock Award column, the cash settlement was not treated separately from the portion settled in stock.
 
(C)
• Energy Management.  The Company has aggressively pursued initiatives to reduce electricity consumption by more than 60 million kilowatt hours annually and natural gas consumption by more than 134 thousand MMBtu (million British thermal units) annually. For example, Excalibur upgraded its domestic hot water system with highly fuel efficient modern heat exchangers. Additionally, we have installed variable frequency drives atAmounts represent the Mandalay Bay Shark Reef and the Mirage Events Center that monitor how much cooling is actually needed in a building at a particular moment, allowing the chiller pumps to respond accordingly rather than work at 100% capacity.
• Water Conservation.  In lightaverage of the desert locationamounts reported for the Company’s NEOs as a group (excluding Mr. Hornbuckle and Mr. Murren) in the “Total” column of the majoritySummary Compensation Table in each applicable year. The names of each of the Company’s casinosNEOs included for purposes of calculating the average amounts in each applicable year are as follows: for 2023 and resorts, the Company has implemented a variety of water-saving strategies2022, Messrs. Halkyard, Sanders, Fritz, and technologies to reduce the impact on our surrounding communities, saving millions of gallons of potable water each year. For instance, all of the Company’s Las Vegas properties incorporate desert landscaping in the land surrounding the resorts that requires less (or no) watering. Further, every Las Vegas property has implemented a “sheetsMcManus; for 2021, Messrs. Halkyard, Sanders, Mandadi, and towels” reuse program,McManus; and low-flow fixtures were installed in CityCenter.
• Green Building.  CityCenter, the Company’s most visible example of sustainable designfor 2020, Messrs. Sanders, McManus, and construction practices, is setting a standard for responsible growth in Las Vegas. It is one of the world’s largest environmentally sustainable urban communities and is committed to maintaining elevated “green” standards. CityCenter received the U.S. Green Building Council’s LEED® Gold certification, making it the largest certified development in the world. Among other sustainable practices, the CityCenter project recycled or reused more than 93% of construction and demolition waste, and more than 50% of all wood products used in ARIA and Crystals is Forest Stewardship Counsel certified, meaning that the wood comes from forests that have sustainable management practices in place; CityCenter represents the greatest use of Forest Stewardship Counsel-certified wood in a single project in the United States to date.Rafiq.


61


 
(D)
• RecyclingCumulative TSR is calculated by dividing the sum of the cumulative amount of dividends for the measurement period beginning December 31, 2019, assuming dividend reinvestment, and Waste Management.  All Company properties on the Las Vegas Strip have implemented robust recycling programs, improvingdifference between the Company’s recycling rate more than 245% from 2007 to 2010. The Company is also a membershare price at the end and the beginning of the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) WasteWise program, which focusesmeasurement period by the Company not only on recycling but also on reducingCompany’s share price at the amount of materials entering the resorts and reusing supplies, furnishings, and other equipment when feasible. One examplebeginning of the Company’s recycling programs is that almost all of the restaurants at MGM Grand Las Vegas have eliminated trash cans and replaced them with color-coded bins for separating waste materials, with a goal of eventually becoming a zero-waste-to-landfill operation. Further, more than 90% of the waste from the shows and exhibits at Mandalay Bay Convention Center is diverted from the landfill.
• Sustainable Supply Chain.  The Company supports sustainable purchasing practices, considering raw materials, logistics, and the performance of a product when making buying decisions, and working with our supply chain to identify best practices and new opportunities for reducing environmental impact. For example, grocery vendors have committed to deliver 90% of all items to Luxor through a maximum of two distributors, reducing transportation to and from distribution centers; MGM Grand Las Vegas tracks “green-friendly” vendors in its purchasing database to easily identify sustainable companies and products; and Monte Carlo and other Strip resorts now utilize environmentally-friendly cleaning products.
• Outreach and Education.  Besides implementing sustainability programs and practices, the Company also focuses on educating employees, guests and the surrounding communities about sustainability, how it affects the tourism industry, and what individuals can do to promote sustainability. The Company launched “Conservation Begins At Home,” an employee awareness campaign where employees learn how to incorporate sustainable practices into their everyday lives. Also, among other initiatives, Mandalay Bay hosts an annual Earth Day fair open to employees, guests and the general public, and, to raise awareness for Earth Hour, the Company shuts off all tower wash lighting, marquees, and signs on its Strip resorts each year in March for one hour (guests are provided with in-room communication explaining the initiative).measurement period.
 
74 
 MGM Resorts International 
2024 Proxy Statement
The Company has received various recognitions and awards for its sustainability practices, including the following:

Pay Versus Performance
 
(E)
• CityCenter earnedRepresents the prestigious Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design — New Construction (LEED-NC) Gold certification rating for six buildings withinweighted peer group TSR of the CityCenter campus, including the ARIA hotel tower and convention center, which certification is awarded based on a project’s environmental design, construction and operations. Today, CityCenter is the largest LEED-NC Gold certified new construction projectcompanies included in the world, and with it the Company has set the standard for environmentally responsible growth and for large-scale development efforts around the world.
• The Green Key Eco-Rating Program, the largest international program evaluating sustainable hotel operations, awarded 12 Company properties the distinguished Green Key designation for “green” business operations. Our resorts were the first in Nevada and Michigan to receive Green Key ratings, and ARIA, Vdara and Mandalay Bay earned the prestigious 5 Key rating.
• The American Society of Interior Designers and Hospitality Design Magazine awarded CityCenter’s ARIA with the 2010 Earth-Minded Award, which recognizes innovative and sustainable design in hospitality.
• The Las Vegas Business Press presented the Company with the 2010 Best Green Owner Award for CityCenter.
• The Glass Packaging Institute recognized the Company as a model in the hospitality industry for its achievements and innovative efforts toward glass-container recycling. The Company is among the six “Friends of Glass” recognized by the Glass Packaging Institute during its second annual Recycle Glass Week.
• The Forest Stewardship Council honored CityCenter’s designers and builders with the 2009 Forest Stewardship Council Award for their commitment to using Forest Stewardship Council-certified wood and creating a marketplace that promotes environmentally appropriate, socially beneficial and economically viable forest management.Dow Jones U.S. Gambling Index.


62


 
(F)
• The Company was presented withRepresents the 2006 Southern Nevada Water Authority Water Hero Award after implementing many water conservation programs, including turf removal and upgrades toamount of net income reflected in the resort’s showerheads and cooling towers.Company’s audited financial statements for the applicable year.
 
(G)Based on the S&P500 Constituents as of January 1 of relevant year.
To continue its commitment
Financial Performance Measures
The three most important financial performance measures used by the Company to sustainability,link executive compensation actually paid to the Company’s NEOs, for the most recently completed fiscal year, to the Company’s performance are as follows:
Total Shareholder Return (“TSR”).
Relative TSR, measured with respect to the S&P 500 Index.
Stock Price.
Analysis of the Information Presented in the Pay versus Performance Table
As described in greater detail in “Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” the Company’s executive compensation program reflects a
pay-for-performance
philosophy. The Company generally seeks to incentivize long-term performance, and therefore does not specifically align the Company’s performance measures with compensation that is actually paid (as computed in accordance with SEC rules) for a particular year. In accordance with SEC rules, the Company is a member or partner of various sustainability-focused organizations, includingproviding the U.S. Green Building Council; The Convene Green Alliance;following graphs to illustrate the EPA WasteWise program; the EPA’s Combined Heat and Power program; and the Company participatesrelationships between information presented in the Carbon Disclosure Project, providing detailed carbon data since 2008.Pay versus Performance table.
Compensation Actually Paid Versus TSR 2020-2023
 
Moreover, the Company has already implemented plans to report to our stockholders on sustainability matters in the normal course
LOGO
MGM Resorts International 
2024 Proxy Statement
75

Pay Versus Performance
 
The Board of Directors recommends a vote AGAINST adoption of this proposal.


63


Compensation Actually Paid Versus Net Income 2020-2023
 
LOGO
Compensation Actually Paid Versus
One-Year
Relative TSR vs. S&P 500 Constituents
LOGO
76 
 MGM Resorts International 
2024 Proxy Statement

Notice Concerning Stockholder Proposals and Nominations
NOTICE CONCERNING STOCKHOLDER
PROPOSALS AND NOMINATIONS
The Company intendsWe intend to hold its 2012our 2025 annual meeting of stockholders in June 2012. Therefore, proposalsMay 2025. Proposals of stockholders intended to be presented at the 20122025 annual meeting of stockholders including nominations for directors submitted in accordance withRule
14a-8
of Regulation 14A under the Exchange Act, must be received by the Companyus on or before December [ l ], 2011November 22, 2024 in order to be considered by the Board of Directors for inclusion in the form of proxy and proxy statement to be issued by the Board of Directors for that meeting.
We expect that the 2025 annual meeting will also be held online and as a virtual meeting only.
Our Amended and Restated Bylaws require that any stockholder proposal that is not submitted for inclusion in next year’s proxy statement underRule
14a-8,
but is instead sought to be presented directly at the 20122025 annual meeting of stockholders, must be received by the Companyus no earlier than February 15, 2012January 1, 2025 and no later than March 16, 2012January 31, 2025 and otherwise comply with the requirements in our Amended and Restated Bylaws. The Amended and Restated Bylaws also require that any stockholder nominations for director candidates under the Company’s proxy access provisions must be received by us no earlier than October 23, 2024 and no later than November 22, 2024. In addition, to comply with the universal proxy rules, stockholders who intend to solicit proxies in support of director nominees other than the Company’s nominees must provide notice that sets forth the information required by Rule
14a-19
under the Exchange Act no later than March 2, 2025. All such stockholder proposals and nominations should be submitted to the Secretary of the Company, by the stated deadline, at the following address: Corporate Secretary, MGM Resorts International, 3600 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada 89109, Attention: Stockholder Communications. If the Company doeswe do not receive your proposal or nomination by the appropriate deadline and in accordance with the terms of the Company’sour Amended and Restated Bylaws, then it may not properly be brought before the 20122025 annual meeting of stockholders. The fact that the Companywe may not insist upon compliance with these requirements should not be construed as a waiver by the Companyus of itsour right to do so at any time in the future.
OTHER INFORMATION
The Company will bear all costs in connection with our solicitation of proxies. The Company intends to reimburse brokerage houses, custodians, nominees and others for theirout-of-pocket expenses and reasonable clerical expenses related thereto. Officers, directors and employees of the Company and its subsidiaries may request the return of proxies from stockholders, for which no additional compensation will be paid to them.
The Company’s Annual Report to Stockholders for the year ended December 31, 2010 accompanies this Proxy Statement.
By Order of the Board of Directors,
-s- James J. Murren
James J. Murren
Chairman of the Board, Chief
Executive Officer & President


64


Appendix A
AMENDED AND RESTATED
CERTIFICATE OF INCORPORATION
OF
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
[                    , 2011]
MGM Resorts International (the “Corporation”), a corporation organized and existing under the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware (the “DGCL”), does hereby certify as follows:
A. The name under which the Corporation was originally incorporated is GRAND NAME, CO., and the date of filing the original certificate of incorporation of the Corporation with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware is January 29, 1986.
B. The first Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (the ‘‘First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation”) was filed June 15, 2010.
C. This second Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Corporation (this ‘‘Amended and Restated Certificate of Corporation”) was duly adopted in accordance with the provisions of Sections 242 and 245 of the DGCL, and restates, integrates and amends the provisions of the First Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation.
D. This Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation shall become effective immediately upon its filing with the Secretary of State of the State of Delaware.
E. The text of the Corporation’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation is hereby amended and restated in its entirety to read as set forth as follows:
1. The name of the Corporation is:
MGM Resorts International
2. The address of its registered office in the State of Delaware is Corporation Trust Center, No. 1209 Orange Street, in the City of Wilmington, County of New Castle. The name of its registered agent at such address is The Corporation Trust Company.
3. The nature of the business, or objects or purposes proposed to be transacted, provided or carried on are:
In general to engage in any lawful act or activity for which corporations may be organized under the DGCL.
4. The aggregate number of shares which the Corporation shall have the authority to issue is 1,000,000,000 shares, all of which are to be common stock, and the par value of each of such shares is to be $.01.
5. The Board of Directors is expressly authorized to adopt, amend or repeal the by-laws of this Corporation.
6. Tender offers for the purchase of equity securities of this Corporation shall not be subject to the provisions of Section 203 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware.
7. The Corporation is to have perpetual existence.
8. Elections of directors need not be by written ballot unless the by-laws of the Corporation shall so provide.
Meetings of stockholders may be held within or without the State of Delaware, as the by-laws may provide. The books of the Corporation may be kept (subject to any provision contained in the statutes) outside the State of Delaware at such place or places as may be designated from time to time by the board of directors or in the by-laws of the Corporation.


A-1


9. The Corporation reserves the right to amend, alter, change or repeal any provision contained in this certificate of incorporation, in the manner now or hereafter prescribed by statute, and all rights conferred upon stockholders herein are granted subject to this reservation.
10. A director of this Corporation shall not be personally liable to the Corporation or its stockholders for monetary damages for breach of fiduciary duty as a director, except for liability (i) for any breach of the director’s duty of loyalty to the Corporation or its stockholders, (ii) for acts or omissions not in good faith or that involve intentional misconduct or a knowing violation of law, (iii) under Section 174 of the General Corporation Law of the State of Delaware or (iv) for any transaction from which the director derives an improper personal benefit.
Any repeal or amendment of this Article 10 by the stockholders of the Corporation shall be prospective only, and shall not adversely affect any limitation on the personal liability of a director of the Corporation existing at the time of such repeal or modification.
11. (A) Except as is otherwise expressly provided in instruments containing the terms of the Corporation’s securities, which instruments have been approved by the New Jersey Casino Control Commission (hereinafter “Commission”), in accordance with Section 82d(7) and (9) of the New Jersey Casino Control Act, N.J.S.A. 5:12-1 et seq. (“Act”), all securities of the Corporation shall be held subject to the condition that if a holder thereof is disqualified by the Commission pursuant to the Act (“Disqualified Holder”), such Disqualified Holder shall dispose of his interest in the Corporation’s securities within 120 days or such other time period required by the Commission following the Corporation’s receipt of notice (the “Notice Date”) of such Disqualified Holder. Promptly following the Notice Date, the Corporation shall personally deliver a copy of such written notice to the Disqualified Holder, mail it to such Disqualified Holder at the address shown on the Corporation’s books and records, or use any other reasonable means of delivering a copy of such written notice to the Disqualified Holder. Failure of the Corporation to provide notice to a Disqualified Holder after making reasonable efforts to do so shall not preclude the Corporation from exercising its rights under this Article 11. Failure of the Corporation to exercise its rights under this Article 11 shall not preclude the Corporation from exercising its rights under Article 12.
(B) A Disqualified Holder shall reimburse the Corporation for all expenses incurred by the Corporation in performing its obligations and exercising its rights under this Article 11 or Article 12.
(C) This Article 11 shall become effective if and when the Corporation becomes a holding company of a casino licensee under the New Jersey Act. This Article 11 shall remain in effect only so long as required by the Commission.
12. So long as the Corporation holds (directly or indirectly) a license or franchise from a governmental agency to conduct its business, which license or franchise is conditioned upon some or all of the holders of the Corporation’s stock possessing prescribed qualifications, any and all shares of the Corporation’s stock shall be subject to redemption by the Corporation, at its sole option and in its sole discretion, to the extent necessary to prevent the loss of such license or franchise or to reinstate it.
Any shares of the Corporation’s stock redeemable pursuant to this Article 12 may be called for redemption immediately for cash, property or rights, including securities of the Corporation or another corporation, on not less than five (5) days notice to the holder(s) thereof at a redemption price equal to the average closing price of such stock on a national securities exchange for the 45 trading days immediately preceding the date of the redemption notice; or if such stock is not so traded, then the average of the high and low closing bid price of the stock as quoted by the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotation system for such 45 trading day period; or if such stock is not so quoted, the redemption price shall be determined in good faith by the Corporation’s Board of Directors.
[THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]


A-2


IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned has duly executed this Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation as of the date first set forth above.
John M. McManus, Secretary


A-3


Appendix B
MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED ANNUAL PERFORMANCE-BASED
INCENTIVE PLAN FOR EXECUTIVE OFFICERS
PURPOSE
The MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL Second Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan For Executive Officers (the “Plan”) is an annual short term incentive plan designed to reward executive officers of MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL (the “Company”), for achieving preestablished corporate performance goals. The Plan is intended to provide an incentive for superior performance and to motivate participating officers toward the highest levels of achievement and business results, to tie their goals and interests to those of the Company and its stockholders, and to enable the Company to attract and retain highly qualified executive officers. The Plan is also intended to preserve the Company’s tax deduction for bonus compensation paid to executive officers by meeting the requirements for performance-based compensation under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and, accordingly, the Plan shall be interpreted to that end.
ARTICLE 1
ELIGIBILITY AND PARTICIPATION
Section 1.1  Participation in the Plan is limited to those executive officers of the Company who are (a) officers among the named executives in the Company’s annual proxy statements and (b) employees of the Company who may become a “covered employee” within the meaning of Section 162(m) of the Code and such other employees, in each case, as determined by the Committee in its discretion. At or prior to the time performance objectives for a “Performance Period” are established, as defined in Section 2.2 below, the Committee (as described in Section 6.1) will designate in writing which executive officers among those eligible shall participate in the Plan for such Performance Period (the “Participants”).
ARTICLE 2
PLAN YEAR, PERFORMANCE PERIODS AND PERFORMANCE OBJECTIVES
Section 2.1  The fiscal year of the Plan (the “Plan Year”) shall be the fiscal year beginning on January 1 and ending on December 31. The performance period with respect to which bonuses shall be calculated and paid under the Plan (the “Performance Period”) shall generally be the Plan Year but may be longer or shorter than a Plan Year; provided, however, that the Committee shall have the authority to designate different Performance Periods under the Plan, which need not be identical for all Participants.
Section 2.2  Within the first ninety days of each Performance Period, the Committee shall establish in writing, with respect to such Performance Period, one or more performance goals, a specific target objective or objectives with respect to such performance goals, and an objective formula or method for computing the amount of bonus compensation awardable to each Participant if the performance goals are attained. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, for any Performance Period, such goals, objectives and formulae must be established within that number of days, beginning on the first day of such Performance Period, which is no more than twenty-five percent of the total number of days in such Performance Period. The Committee shall be permitted to establish such goals, objectives and formulae with respect to each Participant without obtaining stockholder approval, unless the establishment of such goals, objectives and formulae is deemed a material term under the Plan pursuant to the Code requiring disclosure and approval by the stockholders.
Section 2.3  Performance goals shall be based upon one or more of the following business criteria for the Company as a whole or any of its subsidiaries or operating units: stock price; market share; gross revenue; pretax operating income; cash flow; earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization; earnings per share; return on equity; return on invested capital or assets; return on revenues; cost reductions and savings; productivity; equity capital raised; consummation of debt and equity offerings. The foregoing performance goals shall have any


B-1


reasonable definitions that the Committee may specify and may be compared to the performance of a group of comparable companies, or a published or special index, that the Committee, in its discretion, deems appropriate. Measurements of the Company’s or a Participant’s performance against the performance goals established by the Committee shall be objectively determinable and, to the extent they are expressed in standard accounting terms, shall be determined according to generally accepted accounting principles as in existence on the date on which the performance goals are established.
Section 2.4  Subject to Section 162(m) of the Code, the Committee may adjust the performance goals (including to pro-rate goals and payments for a partial Performance Period) in the event of the following occurrences: (a) non-recurring events, including divestitures reorganizations and spin-offs; (b) mergers and acquisitions; and (c) financing transactions.
ARTICLE 3
DETERMINATION OF BONUS AWARDS
Section 3.1  As soon as practicable after the end of each Performance Period (or such sooner time as the performance goals have been met), the Committee shall certify in writing to what extent the Company and the Participants have achieved the performance goal or goals for such Performance Period, including the specific target objectives and the satisfaction of any other material terms of the bonus award, and the Committee shall calculate the amount of each Participant’s bonus for such Performance Period based upon the performance goals, objectives, and computation formulae for such Performance Period established pursuant to Section 2.2 above. The Committee shall have no discretion to increase the amount of any Participant’s bonus as so determined, but may reduce or totally eliminate any Participant’s bonus if it determines, in its sole and absolute discretion, that such a reduction or elimination is appropriate with respect to the Participant’s performance or any other factors material to the goals, purposes, and administration of the Plan.
Section 3.2  No Participant’s bonus for any Plan Year shall exceed the sum of $8,000,000.
ARTICLE 4
PAYMENT OF BONUS AWARDS
Section 4.1  Approved bonus awards shall be payable by the Company in cash or stock to each Participant, or to the Participant’s estate in the event of the Participant’s death, between January 1st and March 15th of the Plan Year following the Plan Year to which the bonus awards relate, subject to the Committee’s certification in writing pursuant to Section 3.1 that the relevant performance goals were achieved.
Section 4.2  A bonus award that would otherwise be payable to a Participant who is not employed by the Company or one of its subsidiaries on the last day of a Performance Period or on such sooner date as the performance goals have been met may be prorated (based on actual performance to the extent required by Section 162(m) of the Code) or not paid based on rules to be established by the Committee for the administration of the Plan.
ARTICLE 5
OTHER TERMS AND CONDITIONS
Section 5.1  No bonus awards shall be paid under the Plan unless and until the material terms (within the meaning of the Code and regulations promulgated thereunder) of the Plan, including the business criteria described in Section 2.3 above, are approved by the stockholders by a majority of votes cast in a separate vote on the issue in person or by proxy (including abstentions to the extent abstentions are counted as voting under applicable state law).
Section 5.2  No person shall have any legal claim to be granted an award under the Plan and the Committee shall have no obligation to treat Participants uniformly. Except as may be otherwise required by law, bonus awards under the Plan shall not be subject in any manner to anticipation, alienation, sale, transfer, assignment, pledge, encumbrance, charge, garnishment, execution or levy of any kind, either voluntary or involuntary. Bonuses awarded under the Plan shall be payable from the general assets of the Company and no Participant shall have any claim with respect to any specific assets of the Company.


B-2


Section 5.3  Neither the Plan nor any action taken under the Plan shall be construed as giving any employee the right to be retained in the employ of the Company or any subsidiary or to obligate the Company or any subsidiary to maintain any employee’s compensation at any level.
Section 5.4  The Company or any of its subsidiaries may deduct from any award any applicable withholding taxes or any amounts owed by the employee to the Company or any of its subsidiaries.
Section 5.5  All bonus awards shall be subject to the Company’s clawback policies, as may be amended from time to time.
Section 5.6  The Company intends that the Plan and all bonus awards avoid the imposition of additional taxes, interest, and penalties pursuant to Section 409A of the Code and, accordingly, the Plan shall be interpreted to that end. Notwithstanding any contrary provision in the Plan, any payments of “nonqualified deferred compensation” (within the meaning of Section 409A of the Code) that are otherwise required to be paid under the Plan to a “specified employee” (as defined under Section 409A of the Code) as a result of his or her termination of employment (which for this purpose shall mean a “separation from service” under Section 409A of the Code) shall be delayed for the first six months following such termination (or, if earlier, the date of death of the specified employee) and shall instead be paid on the first payroll date that immediately follows the end of such six-month period (or the first payroll date scheduled after the death of the specified employee).
ARTICLE 6
ADMINISTRATION
Section 6.1  The Committee shall be comprised of two or more persons who qualify as “outside directors” as defined under Section 162(m) of the Code. Until changed by the Board of Directors of the Company (the “Board”), the Compensation Committee of the Board shall constitute the Committee hereunder.
Section 6.2  The Committee shall have full power and authority to administer and interpret the provisions of the Plan and to adopt such rules, regulations, agreements, guidelines and instruments for the administration of the Plan and for the conduct of its business as the Committee deems necessary or advisable.
Section 6.3  Except with respect to matters which under the Code are required to be determined in the sole and absolute discretion of the Committee, the Committee shall have full power to delegate to any officer or employee of the Company the authority to administer and interpret the procedural aspects of the Plan, subject to the Plan’s terms, including adopting and enforcing rules to decide procedural and administrative issues.
Section 6.4  The Committee may rely on opinions, reports or statements of officers or employees of the Company or any subsidiary thereof and of Company counsel (inside or retained counsel), public accountants and other professional or expert persons.
Section 6.5  The Board reserves the right to amend or terminate the Plan in whole or in part at any time. Unless otherwise prohibited by applicable law, any amendment required to conform the Plan to the requirements of the Code may be made by the Committee. No amendment may be made to the class of individuals who are eligible to participate in the Plan or the performance criteria specified in Section 2.3 without stockholder approval unless stockholder approval is not required in order for bonuses paid to Participants to constitute qualified performance-based compensation under the Code.
Section 6.6  No member of the Committee shall be liable for any action taken or omitted to be taken or for any determination made by him or her in good faith with respect to the Plan, and the Company shall indemnify and hold harmless each member of the Committee against any cost or expense (including counsel fees) or liability (including any sum paid in settlement of a claim with the approval of the Committee) arising out of any act or omission in connection with the administration or interpretation of the Plan, unless arising out of such person’s own fraud or bad faith.
Section 6.7  The place of administration of the Plan shall be the State of Nevada, and the validity, construction, interpretation, administration and effect of the Plan and of its rules and regulations, and rights relating to the Plan, shall be determined solely in accordance with the laws of the State of Delaware.


B-3


(IMAGE)
(BARCODE)
VOTE BY INTERNET - www.proxyvote.com
Use the Internet to transmit your voting instructions and for electronic delivery of information up until 8:59 P.M. Pacific Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you access the web site and follow the instructions to obtain your records and to create an electronic voting instruction form.
Electronic Delivery of Future PROXY MATERIALS
If you would like to reduce the costs incurred by our company in mailing proxy materials, you can consent to receiving all future proxy statements, proxy cards and annual reports electronically via e-mail or the Internet. To sign up for electronic delivery, please follow the instructions above to vote using the Internet and, when prompted, indicate that you agree to receive or access proxy materials electronically in future years.
VOTE BY PHONE - 1-800-690-6903
Use any touch-tone telephone to transmit your voting instructions up until 8:59 P.M. Pacific Time the day before the cut-off date or meeting date. Have your proxy card in hand when you call and then follow the instructions.
VOTE BY MAIL
Mark, sign and date your proxy card and return it in the postage-paid envelope we have provided or return it to Vote Processing, c/o Broadridge, 51 Mercedes Way, Edgewood, NY 11717.
(BARCODE)

(IMAGE)
TO VOTE, MARK BLOCKS BELOW IN BLUE OR BLACK INK AS FOLLOWS:            x
KEEP THIS PORTION FOR YOUR RECORDS

THIS PROXY CARD IS VALID ONLY WHEN SIGNED AND DATED.
DETACH AND RETURN THIS PORTION ONLY

ForWithholdFor All
AllAllExcept
The Board of Directors recommends you vote
FOR the following:
ooo
1.Election of Directors
Nominees

To withhold authority to vote for any individualnominee(s), mark “For All Except” and write the number(s) of the nominee(s) on the line below.
 

 
MGM Resorts International





01 Robert H. Baldwin02 William A. Bible03 Burton M. Cohen04 Willie D. Davis05 Alexis M. Herman
06 Roland Hernandez07 Anthony Mandekic08 Rose McKinney-James09 James J. Murren10 Daniel J. Taylor
11 Melvin B. Wolzinger

2024 Proxy Statement
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR
proposals 2 and 3.
ForAgainstAbstain
2To ratify the selection of the independent registered public accounting firm for the year ending December 31, 2011;ooo
3Advisory vote on executive compensation;ooo
The Board of Directors recommends you vote 1 YEAR on the following proposal:1 year2 years3 yearsAbstain
4
  Advisory vote on frequency of the stockholder advisory vote on executive compensation;oooo
The Board of Directors recommends you vote FOR proposals 5 and 6.ForAgainstAbstain
5To amend and restate the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Company to increase the number of authorized shares of Common Stock to 1,000,000,000;ooo
77
ForAgainstAbstain
6
To approve the Company’s Amended and Restated Annual Performance-Based Incentive Plan for Executive Officers; andooo
The Board of Directors recommends you vote AGAINST the following proposal:
7
Stockholder proposal if presented at the Annual Meetingooo


Please sign exactly as your name(s) appear(s) hereon. When signing as attorney, executor, administrator, or other fiduciary, please give full title as such. Joint owners should each sign personally. All holders must sign. If a corporation or partnership, please sign in full corporate or partnership name, by authorized officer.

JOB #SHARES
CUSIP #
SEQUENCE #
Signature [PLEASE SIGN WITHIN BOX]DateSignature (Joint Owners)Date

(NUMBER)












(NUMBER)



Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the Annual Meeting: The Annual Report, Notice & Proxy Statement is/are available atwww.proxyvote.com.

MGM RESORTS INTERNATIONAL
This proxy is solicited by the Board of Directors
Annual Meeting of Stockholders
June 14, 2011 1:00 PM Eastern Time
The undersigned hereby appoints WILLIAM A. BIBLE, BURTON M. COHEN and WILLIE D. DAVIS, and each of them, Proxies, with full power of substitution, to represent and vote all shares of common stock of MGM Resorts International which the undersigned would be entitled to vote if personally present at the Annual Meeting of Stockholders of MGM Resorts International, and at any adjournments thereof, upon any and all matters which may properly be brought before said meeting or any adjournments thereof. The meeting will be held in the Grand Ballroom at the MGM Grand Detroit located at 1777 Third Street, Detroit, Michigan 48226, on June 14, 2011, at 1:00 p.m., Eastern Time. The undersigned hereby revokes any and all proxies heretofore given with respect to such meeting.
This proxy, when properly executed, will be voted in the manner directed herein. If no such direction is made, this proxy will be voted in accordance with the Board of Directors’ recommendations.
Continued and to be signed on reverse side


LOGO

(NUMBER)